Case law

Board of County Com'rs v. Kinkeade

198 Okla. 662 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1946

J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, and DAVI-SON, JJ., concur.

Cecil v. Board of County Commissioners

10 Okla. 354 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1900

.: Tbis is an appeal from the board of county commissioners of Washita county, to the district court of that county, from an order of the board, declaring, as the result of an election upon the subject, that “stock should … The order of the board of county commissioners was affirmed in the district court, and the case is brought here upon a transcript certified by the clerk of the district court, that “the aboye and foregoing transcript contains

Morrison v. Board of Education

73 O.B.A.J. 1282 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 18, 2002

After the hearing, the Board of Education decided not to renew Morrison's contract. He sued the Board and the Superintendent for tortious breach of contract. … House v.

Hyde v. State Board of Equalization

196 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1945

Tharel v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, 188 Okla. 184 , 107 P. 2d 542 . … of Equalization, within ten days after the adjournment of said Board.”

Jamieson v. State Board of Medical Examiners

35 Okla. 685 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1913

And in Higgins v. Talty, 157 Mo. 280 , 57 S. … Caldwell v. Vaughn et al., 33 Okla. 384 , 125 Pac. 899 , members constituting the county election board of Cus *689 ter county.

Josey Oil Co. v. Board of Commissioners

107 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 17, 1924

Thompson v. Hashbarger, 87 Okla., 267 , 210 Pac. 922 , and eases cited. … It will be noted that these provisions apply to boards of equalization only, and not to boards of county commissioners.

National Surety Co. v. State Banking Board

49 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1915

Ed. 316 , and State Banking Board v. Farish, 235 U. S. 498 , 35 Sup. Ct. 185, 59 L. … In the cases of Lankford v. Schroeder and Farish v. Banking Board, supra, the power of the Banking Board to waive the immunity clause of the federal Constitution was also involved.

Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

584 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1978

The Board denied the license, for reasons to be set out. Lowery appealed Board’s decision to District Court in Washington County. … The court found Board’s decision to be arbitrary and unreasonable, and ordered Board to issue the license. It is from that decision this appeal is taken.

Pottawatomie County, Excise Board v. Lowden

189 Okla. 202 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941

It has been stipulated between the parties to this appeal that both the facts and law in this appeal are identical with the facts and law involved in cause No. 30265, entitled Pottawatomie County, Excise Board, v. *203 Standish … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, J., dissents.

Board of County Commissioners v. Clarke & Courts

12 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 2, 1902

In Comanche County v. … In Robertson v.

Board of Com'rs v. Tulsa Business College

150 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

The board of county commissioners of Tulsa county held the property taxable on the ground that the school was operated for profit. … O. .1., CLARK, V. C. ,X., and RILEY, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ„ concur.

Corporation Commission v. Oklahoma State Personnel Board

513 P.2d 116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers, etc. v. … Pannell v.

American Party v. State Election Board

442 P.2d 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1968

BERRY, Justice (concurring specially): As I view the matter, the State Election Board has stayed the decision of the Secretary of State approving the recognition of the American Party. … Subsequently the State Election Board sua sponte stayed the decision of the Secretary of State. Generally a stay in a proceeding is granted by a tribunal in which the action is pending.

Gallion v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

171 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

, that is, the difference between the surplus that was used by the excise board and the amount of surplus claimed by plaintiff in error, to fill up the shrinkage that occurred in the estimated income from sources other than … Co. v. Myers, 114 Okla. 240 , 248 P. 395 ; C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 P. 48 ; El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 P. 749 ; In re Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

420 P.2d 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1966

Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. … This question was considered in Riley v. Cordell et al., 200 Okl. 390 , 194 P.2d 857 , and in Findley v. State Election Board, Okl., 325 P.2d 1037 .

Tonini & Bramblet v. Board of Com'rs

149 Okla. 183 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1931

(Tonini et al. v. Board of County Com’rs, 100 Okla. 246 , 229 Pac. 263 .) … Board of County Commissioners of Yellowstone County v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (Mont.) 25 Pac. 1058 . Citing In re Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U. S. 700 ; Smith v. Strother (Cal.) 8 Pac. 852 .

Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise Board

200 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1948

Co. v. Bailey, Co. Treas., 125 Okla. 183 , 257 P. 784 . … In McMahan v.

Box v. State Election Board of Oklahoma

526 P.2d 936 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1974

Johnson v. State Election Board, Okl., 370 P.2d 551 (1962). Stevens v. Union Graded School Dist. … J„ WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BARNES, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur. BERRY and HODGES, JJ., dissent. 1 . Dunham v. Ardery, 43 Okl. 619 , 143 P. 331 (1914) ; Board of Education v.

Hunter v. Oklahoma Pardon & Parole Board

451 P.2d 977 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1969

However, the question as to when the Board shall hear such an inmate’s application for parole is governed by a statutory directive that cannot be ignored by the Board and which is enforceable by this Court. … However, when Petitioner has been incarcerated for six years less his deductions as authorized in Section 138 of Title 57 the Pardon and Parole Board has the statutory duty to hear his application for a parole and the Board

Graybill v. Oklahoma State Board of Education

585 P.2d 1358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1978

Anyone checking the minutes of the meeting could determine how each of the five members of the board voted, i. e., each member voted for non-renewal. Appellant cites Oldham v. … LAVENDER, V. C.