Case law

Neallus v. Hutchinson Amusement Co.

126 Me. 469 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1927

Sharp v. Erie R. Co. 184 N.Y. 100 (1906); 76 N.E. 923 ; 6 A. & E Ann Cas. 250; Tyson v. Bauland Co. 186 N. Y. 397 (1906); 79 N. E. 3 ; Perkins Bros. Co. v. Anderson 155 S. W. 556 (Tex. 1913). Deck v. Baltimore & O. R. … Rice v. Harrington, supra.

Milliken v. Buswell

313 A.2d 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 1973

Brown and Wallace W. Brown. Wallace conveyed his interest in the property to his brother, Frank, on March 22, 1911. … Cilley v. Limerock Railroad Company, 1910, 107 Me. 117 , 77 A. 776 ; Brown v. McCaffrey, 1948, 143 Me. 221 , 60 A.2d 792 . In M’Iver’s Lessee v. Walker, 1815, 9 Cranch 173 , 13 U.S. 173 , 3 L.Ed. 694 , Mr.

Ansong v. District Director of Immigration

596 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 25, 1984

Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir.1982); see Martin v. State of Texas, 694 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.1982) (petitioner must prove the allegations on which he relies in his petition at the evidentiary hearing). … See Velasco-Gutierrez v. Crossland, 732 F.2d 792 (10th Cir.1984); Pasquini v. Morris, 700 F.2d 658 (11th Cir.1983); Dong Sik Kwon v.

State v. Wood

662 A.2d 919 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 28, 1995

See State v. Dulac, 600 A.2d 1121, 1122 (Me.1992) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)); State v. Little, 468 A.2d 615, 617-18 (Me.1983). … See State v.

Wilder v. Brace

223 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 30, 1963

See Wall v. King, 206 F.2d 878 (1st Cir. 1953), cert, denied, 346 U.S. 915 , 74 S.Ct. 275 , 98 L.Ed. 411 (1953); Mason v. Hitchcock, 108 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1940). … Brown, J. George Gange and R. N. Hunt, whose terms as directors eoncededly expired at the 1963 annual meeting and who were replaced as directors by plaintiffs Wilder, Khudsen, Brady and Jaffee. .

Tobin v. University of Maine System

59 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 1, 1999

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 38 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Mangla v. Brown, Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir.1998) (“The terms of the contract may include statements provided in student manuals and registration materials.”).

State v. Michaud

513 A.2d 842 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1986

In State v. … V.

Springfield Terminal Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union

767 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 26, 1991

Just as in Withrow v. Larkin, “no specific foundation has been presented” in this case “for suspecting that the Board had been prejudiced.” Id. … See Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253, 258 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1093, 1095 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); Lamphere v. Brown University, 798 F.2d 532, 543 (1st Cir.1986). 8 .

Davies v. City of Bath

364 A.2d 1269 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1976

Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973); Evans v. Board of County Com’rs of County of El Paso, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 (1971); Willis v. Department of Conservation and Econ. … Dev., 55 N.J. 534 , 264 A.2d 34 (1970); Becker v. Beaudoin, 106 R.I. 562 , 261 A.2d 896 (1970); Smith v. State, 93 Idaho 795 , 473 P.2d 937 (1970); Parish v. Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W.2d 45 (1968); Brown v.

Abbott v. Holway

72 Me. 298 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1881

The doctrine of Wyman v. Brown is a good illustration both of the maxim, cessante ratione, cessat etiam lex, and of the changes wrought in the common law by statutory provisions. … .” *308 ■ It differs quite as nrach from tbe provision in tbe case of Wyman v. Brown, to tbe effect that Mrs. Brown was " to bave - quiet possession, and the entire income of tbe premises until her decease.” Brown v.

Hollie A. Beal v. Town of Stockton Springs

153 A.3d 768 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2017

Kirkpatrick v. … Jusseaume v.

Buck v. Swazey

35 Me. 41 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Rogers v. Murray, 3 Paige, 390 ; White v. Carpenter, 2 Paige, 238 . … Pattison v. Hull, 9 Cow. 747 .

Shannon v. Dow

133 Me. 235 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1934

A fifteen-year-old boy named Jack Brown describes the explosion, its causes and some of the incidents which led up to it. This witness apparently is wholly disinterested. … Parker v. Portland Publishing Company, 69 Me., 173; Robinson v. Leighton, 122 Me., 309; Graham v. Ochsner, 193 Iowa, 1196 ; Campbell v. Sutliff, 193 Wis., 370 ; 1 Thompson on Negligence, 904.

Friends of Lamoine v. Town of Lamoine

234 A.3d 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

See Stewart v. … It is therefore unnecessary to address the remaining bases for the Planning Board’s denial. See Tompkins v.

Ethyl Corp. v. Adams

375 A.2d 1065 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 1977

In re Maine Clean Fuels, Inc., Me., 310 A.2d 736, 746 (1973); State v. Johnson, Me., 265 A.2d 711, 714 (1970). … In declining to give probative value to the Board’s “Findings and Order,” the Justice correctly applied this Court’s reasoning in Gagne v.

United States v. Taylor

515 F. Supp. 1321 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 10, 1981

The two men boarded the yacht. Sutherland observed green and brown vegetable matter, which he thought was marijuana — “everywhere you looked” —on the deck and below in the cabin. … United States v.

Edwards v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.

128 Me. 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 14, 1929

Brown, 19 Fed. (2nd), 732; when the appliance was of approved pattern and of the best material, Owen v. Appalachian Pr. Co., 78 W. … Brown v. Worumbo Mfg. Co., 105 Me., 31; Loon v. Jones, 113 Me., 563. A vast volume of testimony was adduced to the effect that the electric current set the house on fire.

Brigham v. Luckenbach

140 F. 322 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1905

In McWilliams v. Vim (D. … As was the case in Haight v.

State v. Ann Marie C.

407 A.2d 715 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1979

The October 24 Confession In State v. Turner, Me., 394 A.2d 798, 799-800 (1978), this court adopted the test established by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. … In Fare v.

State ex rel. Seiders v. City of Bangor

98 Me. 114 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1903

S. (1883), c. 77, § 1; Commonwealth v. Brown, 147 Mass. 585, 591 , 9 Am. St. Rep. 736 , 1 L. R. A. 620. It may do this by express language, or its intention to do so may be inferred. … The statute conferred the power on the county commissioners as persons, not on the board of commissioners as a board. Machias River Co. v. Pope, 35 Maine, 19. It contemplated having the judgment of the three.