Case law

Brown v. State

275 Ala. 692 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1963

Petition of the State, by its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Brown v. State, 154 So.2d 758 . Writ denied. LIVINGSTON, C.

Brown v. State

148 Ala. 657 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 14, 1907

—Weed v. State, 55 Ala. 13 ; Shorter v. State, 63 Ala. 129 ; Brown v. State, 109 Ala. 170 , 20 South. 103 . The judgment of the court is affirmed. Tyson, C. J., and Haralson and Denson, JJ., concur.

Woods' Adm'rs v. Brown

8 Ala. 742 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1845

Brown v. City of Tuscaloosa

196 Ala. 475 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 20, 1916

—Hall v. State, 134 Ala. 90, 115 , 32 South. 750 ; Dominick v. State, 40 Ala. 680 , 91 Am. Dec. 496 ; People v. McDaniels, 137 Cal. 192 , 69 Pac. 1006 , 56 L. R. A. 578, 92 Am. St. Rep. 81 , note page 105. … In the case of Martha v.

Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. Brown

582 So. 2d 502 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 31, 1991

See Mann v. Cherry, Bekaert Holland , 414 So.2d 921 (Ala. 1982); Thompson v. Wiik, Reimer Sweet , 391 So.2d 1016 (Ala. 1980); Gant v. Warr , 286 Ala. 387 , 240 So.2d 353 (1970). … Macey v. Crum , 249 Ala. 249 , 30 So.2d 666 (1947); J.R. Watkins Co. v. Hill , 214 Ala. 507 , 108 So. 244 (1926).

Shores v. Brown

271 Ala. 557 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1961

The identical question presented for decision here was before us in Shores v. Sanders, ante, p. 552, 126 So.2d 201 . On the authority of the opinion in that case, the decree of the probate court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Shores v. Brown

271 Ala. 557 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1961

The identical question presented for decision here was before us in Shores v. Sanders, ante, p. 552, 126 So.2d 201 . On the authority of the opinion in that case, the decree of the probate court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Brown v. State

261 Ala. 696 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 30, 1954

Petition of Frank Claire Brown for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Brown v. State, 37 Ala.App. 595 , 74 So.2d 521 . Writ denied.

Brown v. State

198 Ala. 689 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 19, 1916

Brown for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court affirming the judgment of the trial court in Brown v. The State, 15 Ala. 180 , 72 South. 757 . Writ denied.

Gurganus v. Brown

184 Ala. 530 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 20, 1913

This is the general rule of pleading which is applied with much strictness to this class of actions.” — Co ok v. Rome Brick Co., 98 Ala. 409 , 12 South. 918 . … Under the above-quoted rule, which, under the decision of this court in Ryall v.

Brown v. W.P. Media, Inc.

17 So. 3d 1167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 20, 2009

Brown signed the operating agreement on Alabama MBA’s behalf as its chairman of the board. In May 2005, Brown and Alabama MBA filed a complaint in the Jefferson Circuit Court alleging that, among other things, W.P. … The operating agreement identified Alabama MBA as a corporation, was executed in Alabama MBA’s corporate name, and was signed by Brown as Alabama MBA’s “chairman of the board.” W.P.

Jones v. Alabama State Docks

443 So. 2d 902 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1983

State Docks Commission v. Barnes , 225 Ala. 403 , 405 , 143 So. 581 , 582 (1932), cited in Hutchinson *Page 904 v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama , 288 Ala. 20 , 24 , 256 So.2d 281 , 284 (1972). … Hutchinson v. Board of Trustees of University of Alabama , 288 Ala. at 24 , 256 So.2d at 284 . For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the trial court is affirmed. AFFIRMED.

Brown v. City of Fairhope

265 Ala. 596 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1957

Appellants filed their complaints, consisting of two counts, against the appellees, the City of Fairhope, a municipal corporation, and The Water Works and Sewer Board of the City of Fairhope, a corporation. … In Sisco v.

Bank of Mobile v. Brown

42 Ala. 108 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1868

. — 2 Parson’s on Notes and Bills, 58 ; Little v. Phœnix Bank, 2 Hill, (N. Y.) 425 ; Leiber v. Goodrich, 5 Cowan, 186; Thompson v. Sloan, 22 Wed. 73, and numerous cases there cited. … . — Young v. Scott, 5 Ala. 475 ; Carlisle v. Davis, 7 Ala. 42 . And the principle of these decisions has been adhered to in later cases.

Maxwell v. Brown Shoe Co.

114 Ala. 304 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1896

. — Loeb v. Flash, 65 Ala. 526 ; Spira v. Hornthall, 77 Ala. 137 ; McCormick v. Joseph, 77 Ala. 236 ; Hornthall v. Schonfeld, 79 Ala. 107 ; Kyle v. Ward, 81 Ala. 120 ; LeGrand v. … Eufaula National Bank, 81 Ala. 123 ; Robinson & Ledyard v. Levi, 81 Ala. 134 ; Wollner & Lowenstein v. Lehman, Durr & Co., 85 Ala. 274 ; Darby & Co. v. Kroell, 92 Ala. 607 ; Johnston v. Bent, 93 Ala. 164 ; Traywick v.

City of Auburn v. Brown

638 So. 2d 1339 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 24, 1993

Blackstock v. Airington , 153 Okla. 161 , 5 P.2d 381 (1931). … Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Golden , 486 So.2d 435 , 437 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986); United States v. Bear Brothers, Inc. , 355 So.2d 1133 (Ala.Civ.App. 1978).

Hawkins Lumber Co. v. Brown

100 Ala. 217 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

The property belongs to Emma Brown the wife of D. H. Brown. Every legal question affecting the liability of Emma Brown raised by the evidence was considered and decided by this court in the case of Wadsworth v. … Brown. It is a clear case where credit was extended to D. H. Brown on his personal responsibility alone.

Brown v. Protective Life Insurance

188 Ala. 166 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1914

Co. v. Hillegas, et al., 18 N. J. Law, 11; Louisiana R. R. & Nan. Co. v. Madere, 124 La. 635 , 50 South. 609 ; Finney v. Mercer, 1 Serg. & R. (Pa.) 62; Bank v. Deming, 29 N. C. 55 ; State v. Jersey City, 41 N. J. … Co. v.

Brown v. Dwight Mfg. Co.

200 Ala. 376 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 21, 1917

Anderson v. Robinson, 182 Ala. 615 , 62 South. 512 , 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 330, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 829; Hart v. Coleman, 192 Ala. 447 , 68 South. 315 ; 1 Tiff, p. 574. “The lessee’s eyes are his bargain.” Moore v. … Sheets v. Selden, 7 Wall. 423 , 19 L. Ed. 166 . “That the lessor makes repairs, voluntarily or at the lessee’s request, does not tend to show any agreement by him to make repairs.” 1 Tiff. p. 582.

Brown v. First National Bank

103 Ala. 123 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

Wick Brown.” … Co. v.