Case law

Lambert v. International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2026

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … See Brown v. Children’s Nat. Med. Ctr., 773 F.

United States v. Scurry

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2018

See Um'ted States v. Savoy, 883 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2012). … Um`tea' States v. Scurry, 821 F.3d 1, 8 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (internal citation omitted).

Associated-Banning Co. v. United States

247 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1957

It is clear that the Board has not as yet entered an order “final” as to these petitioners. 9 Petitioners, relying upon Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 10 insist to us that the Board’s order was “final.” … Kansas City Power & Light Company v. McKay, 1955, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 273, 280 et seq., 225 F.2d 924 , 931 et seq., certiorari denied, 1955, 350 U.S. 884 , 76 S.Ct. 137 , 100 L.Ed. 780 ; First National Bank v.

In re Speights

173 A.3d 96 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2017

A sanction at least as severe as that imposed in Askew is therefore appropriate, V. … See Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000). . In support of this argument, respondent relied on the decision of this court’s predecessor in Niosi v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division v. Southern Air, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2020

The Board’s Jurisdiction to Hear the Company’s Grievance The Board framed the first issue as whether it “ha[d] jurisdiction over the Company’s grievance.” Id.; see Madison Hotel v. Hotel & Rest. … AT & T Techs., Inc. v.

Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission, Shell Oil Company, South Texas Natural Gas Gathering Company, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Power Commission

295 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1961

Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393 , 81 S.Ct. 1230 , 6 L.Ed.2d 365 ; Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 , 77 S.Ct. 1152 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535 , 79 S. Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 ; Chapman v. … (Footnotes omitted.) 2 Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F.2d 233, 239 , certiorari denied, 258 U.S. 872 , 79 S.Ct. 111 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 103 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Scarborough v. Natsios

190 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2002

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). An EEOC regulation governs the time limit for initially filing a discrimination claim with a counselor. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457-58 (D.C.Cir.1999) (poor performance evaluations constitute adverse actions only if they cause objectively tangible harm); see Russell v.

McKeeman v. Chaney

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

Alameda Park Co. v. Lucas

37 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1930

We think the decision of the Board was erroneous. … Justice Butler in Bowers, Collector, v. N. Y. & Albany *806 Co., 273 U. S. 350 , 47 S. Ct. 389, 390 , 71 L. Ed. 676 .

United States v. Weekes

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2013

United States v. Tann, No. 04-392, 2006 WL 1313334, at *4 (D.D.C. May 12, 2006) (citations omitted). … Date: December 13, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Ani v. Power

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2024

First, the Agency argues that because Ani received an adverse judgment from the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) on her whistleblowing claims, only the Federal Circuit or other court of appeals can provide further … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985). III. ANALYSIS The Court concludes that all of Plaintiff’s claims must be dismissed.

Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2010

Sanders v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1238, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6818 at *5 (Apr. 15, 2002) (quoting Brown v. United States, 742 F. 2d 1498, 1509 (D.C. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.

Pratt v. Pompeo

318 F. Supp. 3d 34 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 2018

Cir. 2003) (quoting *39 Brown v. Brody , 199 F.3d 446 , 457-58 (D.C. Cir. 1999) ). … Promotion is instead based more generally on "merit and the needs of the Service," with decisions being made by selection boards after the evaluation of a recommended employee's "performance folder[ ]."

Gethers v. United States

556 A.2d 201 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1989

The officers also recovered the brown paper bag, which contained thirteen additional plastic packets of white powder. … Brown, 115 Daily Wash.L.Rptr. 1821 (Super.Ct.D.C.1987) (Kramer, J.), nor is it void for vagueness. See, e.g., Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 377 , 33 S.Ct. 780, 781 , 57 L.Ed. 1232 (1913); Leiss v.

NORTHEAST MOTOR COMPANY v. Neal

162 A.2d 287 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1960

Jess Fisher & Co. v. Darby, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 96 A.2d 270, 272 , 38 A.L.R.2d 538 (1954); Glascoe v. Miletich, D.C.Mun.App.1951, 83 A.2d 587, 588 ; Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App.1950, 77 A.2d 559 .

Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of Police

477 F.2d 411 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1973

Packard Motor Car Co., 215 F.2d 590, 592 (3d Cir. 1954); Routzahn v. Brown, 95 F.2d 766, 769 (6th Cir. 1938); United States Cartridge Co. v. … The school board was one of four involved in the decision in Brown v.

Arizona Public Service Co. v. United States

742 F.2d 644 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1984

V 1981.) (All references to Title 49 of the United States Code are to Supplement V 1981). The Administrative Law Judge in this case found requisite market dominance, see Arizona Public Service Co. v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951). 2 C.

Holderbaum v. POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS R&R BD.

579 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1990

HOLDERBAUM, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1384. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 19, 1990. Decided August 9, 1990. … See Martin v.

Edgerton v. Kingsland

168 F.2d 121 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1947

Upon the expiration of the six montns’ period provided for in the statute the decision of the Board of Appeals against the appellant became res judicata, in the Patent Office. Lavin v. … Abbott v. Coe, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 195 , 109 F. 2d 449 ; Sharp v. Coe, 1941, 75 U.S.App. D.C. 118, 125 F.2d 185 ; Dyer v.

Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.

43 A.3d 925 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 17, 2012

Rodriguez v. Filene's Basement Inc., 905 A.2d 177, 180 (D.C.2006). 7 . Id. at 181 (internal quotation marks omitted). 8 . Morris v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 975 A.2d 176, 181 (D.C.2009) (quoting Brown v. Corr. … Dep’t of Mental Health v. Hayes, 6 A.3d 255, 259 (D.C.2010) (holding that employee's conviction for possession of a controlled substance constituted gross misconduct); Brown v.