Case law

Scarborough v. Natsios

190 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2002

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). An EEOC regulation governs the time limit for initially filing a discrimination claim with a counselor. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457-58 (D.C.Cir.1999) (poor performance evaluations constitute adverse actions only if they cause objectively tangible harm); see Russell v.

Ficara v. Watson

171 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1959

Fletcher v. Watson, 1953, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 204 F.2d 68 . In other words, plaintiff must present clear and conclusive proof to the Court that the ruling of the Patent Office was erroneous. Buck v. … The Board ruled that these claims do not provide the advantages plaintiff alleged over the device of Murphy and the Court agrees with the Board’s decision.

McKeeman v. Chaney

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

SATELLITE 8301123 v. Hodel

648 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 1986

When analyzing a decision under the arbitrary and capricious standard, the Court need only inquire whether the Board’s action in rejecting plaintiffs’ applications had a rational basis. Ethyl Corp. v. … Consideration of materials not in the administrative record is improper in this review as to whether the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Trustees of St. Paul Methodist Episcopal Church South v. District of Columbia

212 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1954

We said in Tumulty v. … An assessment can be made only by an official or board designated by law to make it. An attempted assessment by any other person or board is void. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Elephant Butte Irr.

In re Speights

173 A.3d 96 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2017

A sanction at least as severe as that imposed in Askew is therefore appropriate, V. … See Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000). . In support of this argument, respondent relied on the decision of this court’s predecessor in Niosi v.

Alameda Park Co. v. Lucas

37 F.2d 805 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1930

We think the decision of the Board was erroneous. … Justice Butler in Bowers, Collector, v. N. Y. & Albany *806 Co., 273 U. S. 350 , 47 S. Ct. 389, 390 , 71 L. Ed. 676 .

United States v. Weekes

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2013

United States v. Tann, No. 04-392, 2006 WL 1313334, at *4 (D.D.C. May 12, 2006) (citations omitted). … Date: December 13, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Blocker-Burnette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2010

Sanders v. District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1238, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6818 at *5 (Apr. 15, 2002) (quoting Brown v. United States, 742 F. 2d 1498, 1509 (D.C. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.

Pratt v. Pompeo

318 F. Supp. 3d 34 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 2018

Cir. 2003) (quoting *39 Brown v. Brody , 199 F.3d 446 , 457-58 (D.C. Cir. 1999) ). … Promotion is instead based more generally on "merit and the needs of the Service," with decisions being made by selection boards after the evaluation of a recommended employee's "performance folder[ ]."

NORTHEAST MOTOR COMPANY v. Neal

162 A.2d 287 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1960

Jess Fisher & Co. v. Darby, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 96 A.2d 270, 272 , 38 A.L.R.2d 538 (1954); Glascoe v. Miletich, D.C.Mun.App.1951, 83 A.2d 587, 588 ; Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App.1950, 77 A.2d 559 .

United States v. Mathews

76 F. Supp. 3d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2014

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. … Agent Brown asserts that pursuant to this Court’s Disposition Order, A.P. Mathews should have by this date made a total of 81 payments of $137.50, totaling $11,137.50; in fact, however, A.P.

Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of Police

477 F.2d 411 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1973

Packard Motor Car Co., 215 F.2d 590, 592 (3d Cir. 1954); Routzahn v. Brown, 95 F.2d 766, 769 (6th Cir. 1938); United States Cartridge Co. v. … The school board was one of four involved in the decision in Brown v.

Lawrence Typographical Union v. Mcculloch

349 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1965

National Labor Relations Board v. Internat'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 308 U.S. 413 , 60 S.Ct. 306 , 84 L.Ed. 354 (1940); American Federation of Labor v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Local 182, Internat'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir.1963).

Arizona Public Service Co. v. United States

742 F.2d 644 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1984

V 1981.) (All references to Title 49 of the United States Code are to Supplement V 1981). The Administrative Law Judge in this case found requisite market dominance, see Arizona Public Service Co. v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951). 2 C.

Holderbaum v. POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS R&R BD.

579 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1990

HOLDERBAUM, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1384. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued June 19, 1990. Decided August 9, 1990. … See Martin v.

Gethers v. United States

556 A.2d 201 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1989

The officers also recovered the brown paper bag, which contained thirteen additional plastic packets of white powder. … Brown, 115 Daily Wash.L.Rptr. 1821 (Super.Ct.D.C.1987) (Kramer, J.), nor is it void for vagueness. See, e.g., Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 377 , 33 S.Ct. 780, 781 , 57 L.Ed. 1232 (1913); Leiss v.

Reuss v. Balles

73 F.R.D. 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1976

deputy chairman of the respective boards. … See e. g., Harrington v. Schlesinger, supra. Metcalf v.

International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. NLRB

61 F.4th 971 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 2023

See Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. … Hawaiian Dredging Construction Co. v. NLRB, 857 F.3d 877, 884 (D.C.

Central Fidelity Bank v. McLellan

563 A.2d 358 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1989

United States v. … Bogliano & Co., Inc. v. Brown, 333 A.2d 674 (D.C.1975); Manchester Gardens v. Great West Life Assur. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 320 , 325-26, 205 F.2d 872, 877-78 (1953); cf. Stansel v.