Case law

Citizens for Safe Power, Inc., and Audubon Naturalist Council v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Intervenor

524 F.2d 1291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1975

See, e. g., Environmental Defense Fund v. Ruckelshaus, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 74 , 439 F.2d 584 (1971); Wellford v. Ruckelshaus, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 88 , 439 F.2d 598 (1971), and Environmental Defense Fund v. … Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. Atomic Energy Commission, supra, at 1128 of 449 F.2d 1128 . . The Appeal Board discussed the reasoning of the initial decision concerning alternatives and added: “C.

Abdullah v. Washington

530 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2008

Brown, the D.C. Jail’s Deputy Director of Operations. Def.’s Exs. 5, 11. Mr. Brown directed plaintiff to address his concerns with his correctional counselor and the case manager for his housing unit. Def.’s Ex. 11. … Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Nwachukwu v. Karl, 222 F.R.D. 208, 210 (D.D.C.2004).

Wolff v. Westwood Management, LLC

558 F.3d 517 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2009

Before: ROGERS, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: This case concerns the shelf-life of an arbitration provision in a superseded contract.

Wilhelmus v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2011

Laningham v. U.S. … This case is, accordingly, remanded to the Board so that it may consider the applicability of case AR200309457 in reaching its decision here. See, e.g., Kendall v.

Hartke v. McKelway

526 F. Supp. 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1981

See also King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436 , 439 & n. 2 (5th Cir. 1979); Brown, Federal Special Verdicts: The Doubt Eliminator, 44 F.R.D. 245 (1967). … Lee, 78 A.D.2d 180 , 434 N.Y.S.2d 300 (1980), appeal dismissed, 53 N.Y.2d 797 (1981); Public Health Trust v. Brown, 388 So.2d 1084 (Fla.App.1980); Berman v. Allan, 80 N.J. 421 , 404 A.2d 8 (1979); Wilczynski v.

Tanner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

475 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

United States v. Sammy L. Garrett

959 F.2d 1005 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1992

Brown’s testimony and the telephone records would therefore have been cumulative. … In Gryger v.

Coleman v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

196 F.R.D. 193 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2000

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 151 F.3d 800, 803-04 (8th Cir.1998) (treating issue of sovereign immunity as one of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1)); Barrientos v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. … Mar.12, 1998) (citing cases); see also Vega v. State University of New York Board of Trustees, 2000 WL 381430 , *2 (S.D.N.Y.

Weeda v. District of Columbia

521 A.2d 1156 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1987

In Hayes v. … See Sponaugle v.

Degge v. Hitchcock

35 App. D.C. 218 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1910

Harris v. Barber, supra; Re Schneider, 148 U. S. 162—166, 37 L. ed. 406-408, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 572; Hendley v. Clark, and Bradshaw v. Earnshaw, supra; Hamilton v. Harwood, 113 Ill. 154 ; Gaither v. … Allman v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D. C. 8; Jones v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D. C. 26; Keyser v. District of Columbia, *227 3 App. D. C. 31; Schaefer v. District of Columbia, 3 App. D.

Colbert v. TAPELLA

677 F. Supp. 2d 289 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2010

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … “[T]he scope of review in employment discrimination cases is more narrow than [plaintiff] wishes because federal courts are not review boards for local employment decisions....

Taylor v. Jackson

273 F. 345 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1921

Satterlee v. Williams, 20 App. D. C. 393. … Canadian Religious Ass’n v. Parmenter, 180 Mass. 415 , 62 N. E. 740 ; Jones v. State, 28 Neb. 495 , 44 N. W. 658 , 7 L. R. A. 325; Jennings v. Scarborough, 56 N. J. Law, 401, 28 Atl. 559 ; Bouldin v.

United States of America Ex Rel. Isaac Barr by Missouri Johnson v. Stanley Resor, Secretary of the Army

443 F.2d 707 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1971

See Bates v. … Adams v. Davidson, supra, note 12. See also Majher v. Larsen (N.D.Cal.1970) (3 SSLR 3379); Acquilino v. Laird, 316 F.Supp. 1053 (W.D.Tex.1970); United States ex rel. Healy v.

Beck v. U.S. Gov't

318 F. Supp. 3d 55 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 2018

Its Board of Regents is the governing body, see 20 U.S.C. § 42 (a), to which Secretary David J. Skorton reports, see 20 U.S.C. § 46 . … Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

In re Reed

158 F.2d 323 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1946

See: In re Marzec, 1945, 25 Cal.2d 794 , 154 P.2d 873 ; Sellers v. … Alexander v. United States, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 34 , 136 F.2d 783 ; Mc-Jordan v. Huff, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 171 , 133 F.2d 408 .

District of Columbia v. Tinker

691 A.2d 57 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1997

Soon thereafter, however, the District of Columbia Board of Parole issued a warrant for his arrest, stating that he was on parole from an earlier sentence for robbery and that the Board had information that he was in violation … See Brown v. Jonz, 572 A.2d 455, 456 (D.C.1990). There is no dispute that the statute was tolled by section 12-302(a)(3) from the moment of Tinker’s arrest on September 10. See Cannon v.

United States v. Yeh Hsin-Yung

97 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 2000

United States v. … See Davis v.

Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission

329 F.2d 223 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1963

Wheeler v. National Labor Relations Board, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 255 , 314 F.2d 260 (1963). Compare Universal Camera Corp. v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. National Laundry Co., 78 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 138 F.2d 589 (1943). In Wheeler v.

Harrison v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services

472 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1984

Furthermore, in Dietrich v. … We took this course in Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, though there were also additional procedural transgressions in that case.

Jones v. District of Columbia

158 A.2d 771 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1960

.; that appellant was walking close to the building line and was carrying “an old, dirty brown paper bag.” … Clark v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App.1943, 34 A.2d 711 . 2 . Cf. Barnard v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App.1956, 125 A.2d 514 .