Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.48s
512 F.3d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 16, 2008
If yes, “the next, sequential step is to ask whether the right was clearly established.” Id. … Although our prior decision granted Riebe qualified immunity, it denied qualified immunity for Hall.
Cited 65 timesPublished414 F. Supp. 2d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 2006
Qualified immunity “shield[s officials] from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Any Constitutional Right was Not Clearly Established Assuming arguendo that the D.C.
Vacated on other grounds by Bair v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 763 (2008)Cited 20 timesPublishedDavis v. Education Service Center
62 S.W.3d 890 · Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · Dec 5, 2001
. § 22.051(a); rather, Region VIII qualifies for sovereign immunity as an agency of the State. Sovereign immunity, unless waived, insulates the State of Texas, its agencies, and its officials from lawsuits for damages. … In Matthews , the court ruled the defendant did not have a qualified immunity for violating Title VII. Id. at 847 .
Cited 38 timesPublished259 F. Supp. 3d 484 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 10, 2017
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY The Defendants raise the same arguments for their damages claim that they do,:-,for the .state action immunity claim. … Furthermore, qualified immunity is an affirmative defense and the Board Members must both plead and establish their entitlement to that defense. Gomez v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSoto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC
139 F. Supp. 3d 560 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 9, 2015
The record establishes that the immunity provided by this statute will also be asserted with regard to the claims against the other defendants. 5 The “no possibility” standard used to assess claims of fraudulent joinder aims … In contending that the plaintiffs’ claims against Riverview are clearly baseless in light of the immunity provided by the PLCAA, defendants -ask this Court to determine that the -word “use” in the negligent entrustment exception
Cited 8 timesPublished4 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 2001
To be considered “clearly established” for the purposes of qualified immunity analysis, “[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that … A claim of immunity under the Idaho Tort Claims Act is not an immunity from suit, as qualified and absolute immunity are.
Cited 1 timesPublished300 F. Supp. 3d 945 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Jan 2, 2018
immunity because the Sixth Circuit's prior case law clearly established that the officers' conduct was unlawful. … "clearly established" prong.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMiddaugh v. City of Three Rivers
629 F. App'x 710 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 26, 2015
It is well established, however, that the doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … Clearly Established Rights The second step of our qualified immunity analysis asks whether the rights at issue were clearly established at the time of the alleged violation. See id. at 306 .
Cited 2 timesPublished933 F. Supp. 977 · District Court, D. Idaho · May 28, 1996
Qualified immunity protects law enforcement officials from liability for civil damages unless their conduct violates “clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. … Even if the Court cannot find as a matter of law that the shot was reasonable, Defendants assert, the Court can find that the law on excessive force was not clearly established and that Horiuchi has qualified immunity.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMinisterio Roca Solida v. United States Department of Fish & Wildlife
288 F.R.D. 500 · District Court, D. Nevada · Jan 14, 2013
, and qualified immunity for McKelvey,” which plaintiff “essentially ignores.” (# 18). … not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would know.” (# 17)(citing Harlow v.
Cited 81 timesPublishedMencer v. Bd. of Ed./Birmingham, AL
134 F.3d 1066 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 5, 1998
Thus, the court did not deny Hammonds qualified immunity based only on "evidence sufficiency" but on its belief that a reasonable person in Hammonds' position would have known his conduct violated clearly established law … Thus, if we are confronted with an appeal from a denial of qualified immunity, we may exercise our discretion to review the district court's preliminary determination as a means of reaching the issue of clearly established
Cited 1 timesPublished694 So. 2d 1302 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 2, 1997
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY Defoor also contends that Evesque was not entitled to immunity while performing the function of inspecting and cleaning the test site. … This defendant's function clearly required due care rather than difficult decision making. On the other hand, we accepted the claim of immunity in Gill v.
Cited 10 timesPublished316 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 3, 2003
immunity. … We reinstate our prior decision in its entirety and supplement, by this opinion, our previous discussion of qualified immunity. SO ORDERED. .
Cited 4 timesPublishedRiverdale Mills Corp. v. United States
337 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 16, 2004
In evaluating a claim for qualified immunity, a court must determine: 1) whether the plaintiffs allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation, 2) whether the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged … The answer to each inquiry must be affirmative to overcome a defense of qualified immunity. Id. The Court is underwhelmed by defendants’ arguments that they are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 1 timesPublished801 F. Supp. 2d 1235 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 10, 2011
Qualified immunity protects police officers acting within their discretionary authority from civil liability in § 1983 actions so long as their conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights … Where, as here, qualified immunity is raised in a motion to dismiss, this Court must “look to the pleadings to see if the plaintiff has successfully alleged the violation of a clearly established right.” *1240 O’Rourke, 378
Cited 1 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. HP Pelzer Automotive Systems, Inc. (TV2)
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 2, 2020
and defendant affidavits represented “nothing more than conflicting witness testimony”); Wayne, 36 F.3d at 530 (upholding district court’s denial of attorney fees where defendants won summary judgment on the basis of qualified … immunity, but plaintiffs also sued for injunctive relief, which was not barred by immunity); Beard v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKatherine Reynolds v. City of Anchorage, Leslie Watson, Jefferson County Officer
379 F.3d 358 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 9, 2004
Under qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions, generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … Fitzgerald, Mitchell [was] immune unless his actions violated clearly established law.”).
Cited 19 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 5, 2024
Unless he had arguable probable cause to seize the phones, he violated the plaintiffs’ clearly established right to be free from unreasonable seizures of their property and is not entitled to qualified immunity. … Smith based on qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublished226 F. Supp. 3d 914 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 22, 2016
Qualified immunity insulates government officials from liability in their individual capacities so long as they have not violated clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Parrish v. … Even if the application of the Arkansas Sex Offender Registration Act to Edmond violated the ex post facto clause, the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because the right at issue was not clearly established at
Cited 0 timesPublished481 F. Supp. 2d 1248 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 14, 2007
City of Birmingham, the Eleventh Circuit held that in cases where qualified immunity is implicated, “some factual detail is necessary, especially if [the court is] to be able to see that the allegedly violated right was clearly … Qualified Immunity Defendant invokes qualified immunity as a defense to Plaintiffs § 1983 equal protection claim against him in his *1259 individual capacity. (Doc. No. 5 at 15-16.)
Cited 58 timesPublished
Ask Donna