Case law

Brown v. Brown

33 L.R.A. 816 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 2, 1895

Brown v. Brown

379 S.C. 271 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 28, 2008

See Pool v. … Brown v. Brown, Op. No.2008-UP-051 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Jan. 14, 2008) (unpublished opinion). 2 . We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Brown v. Brown

2021 Ohio 1932 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2021

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2021-Ohio-1932.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY JASON R. … BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 14-20-24 v. MEAGHAN J. BROWN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Brown v. Brown

124 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1894

Farber v. Purdy, 69 Mo. 602 . … Williams v. Hudson, 93 Mo. 224 ; Allen v. McCabe, 93 Mo. 138 .

Brown v. Brown

7 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

Corp., sec. 431; Girard, Will Case, 2 *298 Howard, 127 ; McDonough Will Case, 15 Id. 367; Philadelphia v. Girard’s Heirs, 45 Pa. 9 .) … Y. 460 ;Foulke v. Zimmerman, 14 Wall. 113 .)

Indiana University v. Hartwell

174 Ind. App. 325 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1977

Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E.2d 399 ; State ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd. (1951), 230 Ind. 1 , 101 N.E.2d 60 . … Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd., supra and Schakel v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division (1968), 142 Ind. *331 App. 475, 235 N.E.2d 497 .

United States v. Grote

629 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 16, 2009

He inspected the contents of the brown paper bag and found that it contained a full, unopened bottle of vodka. … United States v. Ortiz, 714 F.Supp. 1569, 1577-80 (C.D.Cal.1989), affirmed without opinion sub nom. in United States v. Valenzuela, 899 F.2d 19 (9th Cir.1990); United States v.

Brown v. Brown

79 So. 3d 190 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 2012

See Holden Cove, Inc. v. 4 Mac Holdings, Inc., 948 So.2d 1041, 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (rejecting an irreparable harm argument as being premature and speculative). … See Jackson v. Computer Sci. Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not arise unless the court first establishes irreparable harm.”).

Brown v. Brown

520 S.W.2d 571 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1975

Whatley v. Whatley, 493 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1973, no writ); Harris v. Lebow, supra; Johnson v. Brown, 218 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e.). … As to Cooper v.

Brown v. Brown

31 So. 3d 532 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2010

Loftice v. Loftice, supra. … See, e.g., Skannal v.

Brown v. Brown

190 Conn. 345 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 14, 1983

Pasquariello v. Pasquariello, 168 Conn. 579, 584 , 362 A.2d 835 (1975). The award, therefore, was made in error. … Costello v. Costello, 186 Conn. 773, 778-79 , 443 A.2d 1282 (1982).

Brown v. Brown

180 So. 2d 106 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1965

180 So.2d 106 (1965) Barbara Anderson BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald T. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10448. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 28, 1965. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1965. … Estopinal v. Estopinal, 223 La. 485 , 66 So.2d 311 (1953) and McCaa v. McCaa (La.App., 2 Cir., 1964) 163 So.2d 434 , writ refused 246 La. 579 , 165 So.2d 480 . Mrs.

Brown v. Brown

187 So. 3d 538 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2016

Brown’s exception of no cause of action. Appellate courts conduct a de novo review óf a trial court’s ruling granting an exception of'ho cause of action as the exception presents questions of law. St. Pierre v. … See Melancon v. D & M Enterprises, 95-0644 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/28/95) , 662 So.2d 54 ; DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co., 07-1117 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/30/08) , 975 So.2d 682 ; and Stroscher v.

Brown v. Brown

255 So. 3d 313 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 11, 2018

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667

Brown v. Brown

2013 Ohio 3456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2013

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] … [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] I. The Relocation Restriction {¶ 2} The parties, Holli and Troy Brown, are the mother and father of three minor children.

Brown v. . Brown

168 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

Brown during their lives, he was not barred. Harris v. Bennett, 160 N. C., 339, 347 , and cases there cited. But there is another view of the matter. The deed of Joseph H. Brown to his brother, Gray L. … Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Johnson v. Farlow, 35 N. C., 84 ; Scarborough v. Scarborough, 122 N. C., 234 . It was said in Chatham v. Lansford, 149 N.

Brown v. Brown

4 Conn. 269 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 15, 1822

Whether he make payment to the plaintiffs, or to the keeper of a boarding-house, for his support, is of no importance to him, if he is not obliged to incur unreasonable expense. … In Backus v. Dudley, 3 Conn. Rep. 568 . this court decided, that a town was not obliged to support their poor abroad, who refused to be supported at home. The case of Wilder v. Whittemore, 15 Mass.

Brown v. Brown

158 So. 2d 305 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1964

158 So.2d 305 (1963) Tom BROWN et al. v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana. No. 5947. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … See Adams v. Review Board (1951), 121 Ind.App. 273 , 98 N.E.2d 681 , Bartlett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act (Connecticut, 1955), 142 Conn. 497 , 115 A.2d 671 , Cameron v.