Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

0.91s

  • Robinson v. Builders Board of Oregon

    20 Or. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

    The Board in the context of ORS ch 701 makes orders under the Act; a court makes judgments. … That this was realized by the Board is illustrated by the fact that the Board refused to entertain petitioner’s claim until it had been reduced to a circuit court judgment. *344 There is no hint anywhere in the Act to indicate

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    103 Or. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 12, 1990

    Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) that ordered that he be continued under its jurisdiction. We affirm. … Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367, 371 , 776 P2d 577 (1989). (First emphasis supplied; second emphasis in original.)

    Reversed on other grounds by Martin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 312 Or. 157 (1991)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Person v. Board of Parole

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 9, 2023

    In State v. … Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 206-07, 335 P3d 828 (2014). 342 Person v. Board of Parole under ORS 161.725 is present at the time of the parole con- sideration hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boughan v. Board of Engineering Examiners

    46 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1980

    Re Heirich, 10 Ill 2d 357, 140 NE2d 825 , 67 ALR2d 827, cert den 355 US 805 (1976); State ex rel Miller v. Aldridge, 212 Ala 660, 103 So 835, 39 ALR 1470 (1925); New Jersey State *291 Board of Optometrists v. … Campbell v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gordon v. State Board of Parole

    48 Or. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

    Petitioner could have sought judicial review of the board’s decision and raised his constitutional arguments there. Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 (1980). … Given the availability of an alternative remedy, habeas corpus relief was improper, Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978), and the circuit court correctly granted defendant’s demurrer. Cf., Sterling v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Einstein v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    153 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1998

    In Garcia v. … See Martin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McKay v. Board of Medical Examiners

    100 Or. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1990

    Spray v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, supra, relying on Megdal v. … See Norris v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Board of Nursing

    115 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

    He argues that the Board failed to explain how it found that he is likely to invade the privacy and offend the dignity of patients. In Dennis v. … The legislature authorized the Board to adopt rules that define conduct derogatory to the standards of nursing, ORS 678.150(10) and ORS 678.150(7)(h), and the Board has. See Megdal v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Koller v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board

    243 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2011

    $37,478.57, McCarthy v. … The board notes that ORS 183.635 requires the board to use an ALJ from the Office of Administrative Hearings.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    350 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

    Affirmed. 530 State v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Brown that he had pills in the container. See State v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Menzl v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    325 Or. 159 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

    The order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Board for reconsideration. 1 The DSM is a publication of the American Psychiatric Association that categorizes mental disorders … Axis I consists of clinical syndromes and V Codes. V Codes are conditions not attributable to a mental disorder that are a focus of attention or treatment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Childress v. Board of Psychology

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2023

    .”); State v. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Board of Parole

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

    Reversed and remanded. 14 Watson v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. … Id.; see also Baker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

    117 Or. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

    On May 31,1990, the board sent a renewal notice to petitioner. … Although the “global considerations” do not constitute a board rule, they may be construed as establishing board policy.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Watts v. Oregon State Board of Nursing

    282 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 2016

    Thomas Creek Lumber v. Board of Forestry, 188 Or App 10, 30 , 69 P3d 1238 (2003). … In support of that argument, the board relies on Becklin v. Board of Examiners for Engineering, 195 Or App 186 , 97 P3d 1216 (2004), rev den, 338 Or 16 (2005).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hodgin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    113 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1992

    hearing, because PSRB is required at that hearing to determine if a person under its jurisdiction may be discharged, which requires a finding of whether the person is affected by a mental disease or defect. 3 See Martin v. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); Valleur v. Psychiatric Review Board, 43 Or App 843, 845 , 604 P2d 439 (1979). Reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Erskine v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    257 Or. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2013

    Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (the board) conditionally releasing him to the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections (DOC). We reverse and remand. … In view of the requirements of ORS 161.341, we agree and accept the board’s concession. Accordingly, the board’s order must be reversed and the case remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joiner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYE RELATIONS BOARD

    14 Or. App. 567 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 1973

    See also, Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Miesen v. Dept. of Commerce, 3 Or App 251 , 473 P2d 691 (1970). … See, MacMillan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Flores v. Brown

    341 Or. App. 815 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 2025

    Affirmed. 816 Flores v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Blain v.

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • English v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    230 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 2009

    In Hewitt v. State Accident Ins. … In support *514 of that proposition, petitioners rely on Tanner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.