Case law

Indiana University v. Hartwell

174 Ind. App. 325 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1977

Warren v. Indiana Telephone Co. (1940), 217 Ind. 93 , 26 N.E.2d 399 ; State ex rel. Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd. (1951), 230 Ind. 1 , 101 N.E.2d 60 . … Standard Oil Co. v. Review Bd., supra and Schakel v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division (1968), 142 Ind. *331 App. 475, 235 N.E.2d 497 .

Brown v. Brown

329 Ill. 198 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1928

(Parker v. Gray, 317 Ill. 468 ; Murdock v. Murdock, 219 id. 123; Hessick v. Hessick, 169 id. 486; Achilles v. Achilles, 151 id. 136; Taylor v. Taylor, 144 id. 436.) … (Hessick v. Hessick, supra; Mines v. Phee, 254 Ill. 60 ; Murdock v. Murdock, supra.)

Brown v. Brown

79 So. 3d 190 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 9, 2012

See Holden Cove, Inc. v. 4 Mac Holdings, Inc., 948 So.2d 1041, 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (rejecting an irreparable harm argument as being premature and speculative). … See Jackson v. Computer Sci. Raytheon, 36 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Certiorari jurisdiction does not arise unless the court first establishes irreparable harm.”).

Brown v. Brown

379 S.C. 271 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 28, 2008

See Pool v. … Brown v. Brown, Op. No.2008-UP-051 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Jan. 14, 2008) (unpublished opinion). 2 . We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Brown v. Brown

106 Fla. 423 · Supreme Court of Florida · Aug 9, 1932

Brown left surviving her four children: Doctor Brown, Mrs. Worthington, Mrs. J. B. Roberts and R. L. Brown. In January, 1925, R. L. Brown, Jessie L. Roberts and Mrs. … Fox v. Kimball, 92 Fla. 401 , 109 South. Rep. 465 ; McGill vs. Chappelle, 71 Fla. 479 , 71 South. Rep. 836 ; Semple v. Semple, 90 Fla. 7 , 105 South. Rep. 134 ; Johnson v. Sherehouse, 61 Fla. 647 , 54 South. Rep. 892 .

Brown v. Brown

520 S.W.2d 571 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1975

Whatley v. Whatley, 493 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1973, no writ); Harris v. Lebow, supra; Johnson v. Brown, 218 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1948, writ ref’d n. r. e.). … As to Cooper v.

Brown v. Brown

31 So. 3d 532 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2010

Loftice v. Loftice, supra. … See, e.g., Skannal v.

United States v. Grote

629 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 16, 2009

He inspected the contents of the brown paper bag and found that it contained a full, unopened bottle of vodka. … United States v. Ortiz, 714 F.Supp. 1569, 1577-80 (C.D.Cal.1989), affirmed without opinion sub nom. in United States v. Valenzuela, 899 F.2d 19 (9th Cir.1990); United States v.

Brown v. Brown

33 L.R.A. 816 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 2, 1895

Brown v. Brown

180 So. 2d 106 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1965

180 So.2d 106 (1965) Barbara Anderson BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald T. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10448. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 28, 1965. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1965. … Estopinal v. Estopinal, 223 La. 485 , 66 So.2d 311 (1953) and McCaa v. McCaa (La.App., 2 Cir., 1964) 163 So.2d 434 , writ refused 246 La. 579 , 165 So.2d 480 . Mrs.

Brown v. Brown

255 So. 3d 313 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 11, 2018

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

2013 Ohio 3456 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 2013

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] … [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3456.] I. The Relocation Restriction {¶ 2} The parties, Holli and Troy Brown, are the mother and father of three minor children.

Brown v. . Brown

168 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

Brown during their lives, he was not barred. Harris v. Bennett, 160 N. C., 339, 347 , and cases there cited. But there is another view of the matter. The deed of Joseph H. Brown to his brother, Gray L. … Wilson v. Brown, 134 N. C., 400 ; Johnson v. Farlow, 35 N. C., 84 ; Scarborough v. Scarborough, 122 N. C., 234 . It was said in Chatham v. Lansford, 149 N.

Brown v. Brown

190 Conn. 345 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 14, 1983

Pasquariello v. Pasquariello, 168 Conn. 579, 584 , 362 A.2d 835 (1975). The award, therefore, was made in error. … Costello v. Costello, 186 Conn. 773, 778-79 , 443 A.2d 1282 (1982).

Brown v. Brown

187 So. 3d 538 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2016

Brown’s exception of no cause of action. Appellate courts conduct a de novo review óf a trial court’s ruling granting an exception of'ho cause of action as the exception presents questions of law. St. Pierre v. … See Melancon v. D & M Enterprises, 95-0644 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/28/95) , 662 So.2d 54 ; DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co., 07-1117 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1/30/08) , 975 So.2d 682 ; and Stroscher v.

Brown v. Brown

4 Conn. 269 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 15, 1822

Whether he make payment to the plaintiffs, or to the keeper of a boarding-house, for his support, is of no importance to him, if he is not obliged to incur unreasonable expense. … In Backus v. Dudley, 3 Conn. Rep. 568 . this court decided, that a town was not obliged to support their poor abroad, who refused to be supported at home. The case of Wilder v. Whittemore, 15 Mass.

Brown v. Brown

158 So. 2d 305 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 14, 1964

158 So.2d 305 (1963) Tom BROWN et al. v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana. No. 5947. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … See Adams v. Review Board (1951), 121 Ind.App. 273 , 98 N.E.2d 681 , Bartlett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act (Connecticut, 1955), 142 Conn. 497 , 115 A.2d 671 , Cameron v.

Brown v. Brown

66 Idaho 625 · Idaho Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1946

Simonton v. Simonton, 33 Ida. 255 at 263 , 193 Pac. 386 ; Simpson v. Simpson, 51 Ida. 99 at 104 , 4 P. (2d), 345 ; Phillips v. Phillips (Wash.), 6 P. (2d) 61 ; Keck v. Keck (Calif.), 26 P. (2d) 300 at 302 ; Adair v. … Brown, the present Mrs. Brown with regard to the other phase of the case and particularly directed to the defendant, the qualifications of Mr. Brown now in the home.