Case law

Duckworth v. the United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2009

Tranor v. Brown, 913 F. Supp. 388, 391 (E.D. Pa. 1996); Burstein v. Applied Extrusion Techs., Inc., 829 F. Supp. 106, 110 (D. … Brown, Jr. GARRETT E. BROWN, JR., U.S.D.J. 7

Artis v. Greenspan

307 F.R.D. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2014

Board failed to respond.” … See, e.g., Moore v. Napolitano, 926 F.

Lockett v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2023

Godfrey v. Iverson, 559 F.3d 569, 571 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 760 (D.C. 2001)). … DeWitt v. District of Columbia, 43 A.3d 291, 296 (D.C. 2012). A favorable termination “must reflect on the merits of the underlying action.” Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1246 (D.C. 1986).

In re Schuman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2021

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, and Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, were on the brief, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Before BECKWITH, MCLEESE, and DEAHL, Associate Judges. … The Board summarized the remainder of Dr.

Louisiana Federal Land Bank Ass'n, FCLA v. Farm Credit Administration

180 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2001

See FDA v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (citing Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 187 , 111 S.Ct. 1759 , 114 L.Ed.2d 233 (1991)). C. … See generally Chevron, 467 U.S. 837 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 (1984), FDA v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000), Federal Power Comm’n v.

Davis v. United States

390 A.2d 976 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1978

On July 19, an unidentified man came out of 1844 Kalorama Road and deposited a brown paper bag in a trash can in front of 1862 Kalorama Road. … Lerner v.

Nevada Irrigation District v. Sobeck

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2021

(“the State Board”). … Aishat v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 288 F. Supp. 3d 261, 269 (D.D.C. 2018). Here, the State Board’s preferred forum is the Eastern District. Mot. at 36–41.

Washington v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.

330 F. Supp. 3d 232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 2018

Brown's participation was improper, she suggests, because she had previously filed a claim of harassment against Brown with WMATA's Office of Employee Relations in January 2015. See id. ¶¶ 24-27, 64. … Similarly, in Evans v.

Marcus v. Department of Treasury

813 F. Supp. 2d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 541-43 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (“The Title VII remedy declared exclusive for federal employees in Brown v.

Bolger v. Marshall, Secretary of National Defense

193 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 1951

Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 1938, 303 U.S. 41, 50 , 58 S.Ct. 459, 463 , 82 L.Ed. 638 . … We do not say, of course, that the Army Discharge Review Board can or should grant the relief sought in the District Court. These are matters for determination in the first instance by that Board and not by us. Myers v.

Manuel Gonzalez-Jasso v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States

264 F.2d 584 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 1959

Nor can the admissions before the second or third Board of Special Inquiry be used as a basis for establishing the trustworthiness of the admissions before the first Board of Special Inquiry. Cf. United States v. … See Martinez v. McGrath, D.C.S.D.Tex. 1952, 108 F.Supp. 155 ; Nieto v. McGrath, supra.

Garey's v. Union Bank of Georgetown

10 F. Cas. 1 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1827

Renner, who made the' application to the board, must have known it, if it existed; at least, it is strange if he did not. … Garey was confessed in December term, 1817, and the decision of the Court which caused this alarm to the banks was not until the 11th of June, 1818, in the case of Beeding v. Pic, ( 2 Cranch, C. C. 152 .)

Crease v. Parker

6 F. Cas. 791 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1807

He also inclined to the opinion that the acknowledgment to Harris was a fact from which the jury might infer an express promise by the defendant subsequent to his emancipation, and before the suit brought See Williams v. … Brown, 3 Bos. & P. 72, Heath, J.’s, opinion.

Corning Glass Works v. Lucas

37 F.2d 798 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1929

We therefore affirm the Board on this branch of the ease. … W. 1065 ; Sherman Center Town Co. v. Russell, 46 Kan. 382 , 26 P. 715 ; Whetstone v. Ottawa University, 13 Kan. 320 ; Vandall v. South San Francisco Dock Co., 40 Cal. 83 ; B. S. Green Co. v.

Glascoe v. Miletich

83 A.2d 587 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1951

As was said by us in Mitchell v. … Creighton v. Brown, D.C.Mun.App., 77 A.2d 559 ; Lippincott v. Kerr, 59 App.D.C. 290 , 40 F.2d 802 ; Robertson v. Ramsay, 54 App.D.C. 346 , 298 F. 557 . Affirmed.

United States v. Opportunity Fund & Tiger Eye Investments, Ltd.

613 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 16, 2010

See Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 86 , 94 S.Ct. 937 , 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974); United States v. … City of Chicago v. Envtl. Def. Fund, 511 U.S. 328, 337 , 114 S.Ct. 1588 , 128 L.Ed.2d 302 (1994); see also Exxon Mobil Corp. v.

Government of Rwanda v. Rwanda Working Group

227 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 27, 2002

(quoting Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.1958)). In Brown , the D.C. … Brown, 253 F.2d at 40 .

Friedman v. U.S. Secret Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2014

COLUMBIA ________________________________ ) DONALD FRIEDMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: January 2, 2014 /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Pfizer Inc. v. Heckler

735 F.2d 1502 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1984

Philips’ Gloeilampenfabrieken v. … These cases were consolidated on appeal. . 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395f(b), 1395x(v)(1)(A), 1396a(a)(30) (1976 & Supp. V 1981). . Id. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). .

Coates v. District of Columbia

42 App. D.C. 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1914

Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. D. C. 273, 282, 25 L.R.A. (N.S.) 98; District of Columbia v. Tyrrell, 41 App. D. C. 463. … Corp. 5th ed. § 1642; Bryant v. St. Paul, 33 Minn. 289 , 53 Am. Rep. 31 , 23 N. W. 220 ; Mitchell v. Rockland, 52 Mo. 118, 121 ; Lynde v. Rockland, 66 Me. 309, 315 ; Ogg v. Lansing, 35 Iowa, 495, 498 , 14 Am.