Case law

Dobyns v. United States

30 A.3d 155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2011

In this appeal, citing Brown v. … Brown, 35 App.D.C. at 555 .

Loma Linda University Medical Center v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2009

Loma Linda v. … V.

Loma Linda University Kidney Center v. Burwell

185 F. Supp. 3d 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2016

On remand before the agency, the Board rendered decisions on September l, 201 5, finding that CMS properly denied plaintiffs’ applications_the Board declined to address the timeliness issue. Pls.’ … Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelz`us, 666 F.3d 1335, l336 (D.C.

Abdullah v. Roach

668 A.2d 801 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1995

Abdullah averred that the Housing Board found no factual basis for continuing administrative segregation, and that the Board recommended that Abdullah be returned to “Open Population.” … See, e.g., Adams, supra, 656 A.2d at 731-33 (entertaining petition for writ of ha-beas corpus based on Parole Board’s alleged failure to comply with its regulations); Liberatore v.

Gordon v. Holder

632 F.3d 722 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 2011

Before: ROGERS, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … NLRB v.

In re Neill

722 A.2d 849 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1999

the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, the report and recommendation of the Board … It is FURTHER ORDERED that Bar Counsel’s petition for discipline based upon respondent’s criminal conviction in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (United States v. Denis M.

In re American Circular Loom Co.

28 App. D.C. 450 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1906

See also Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540, 542 , 35 L. ed. 247, 248, 11 Sup. Ct. … Co. v. Tennessee Mfg. Co. 138 U. S. 531, 541 , 34 L. ed. 997, 1003, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 396; Cellular Clothing Co. v. Maxton [1899] A. C. 326.

United States v. Gregory Hurt

543 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1976

Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 71-72 & n. 4, 402 F.2d 209 , 212 & n. 4 (1968); Brown v. Shimabukuro, 73 App.D.C. 194, 195 , 118 F.2d 17, 18 (1941); Young v. … Prosser, Torts § 109 at 796-797 (3d ed. 1964); Brown v. Collins, supra note 24, 131 U.S.App.D.C. at 72, 402 F.2d at 212 . 26 . Brown v. Collins, supra note 24, 131 U.S. App.D.C. at 71, 72, 402 F.2d at 211, 212 .

In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

120 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2000

Fahner, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs. … Marovitz, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, Thomas M. Mueller, Mayer Brown & Platt, New York City, Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, PLLC, Washington, DC, D. Stuart Meiklejohn, New York City, Stacey R.

Bechtel Associates, P.C. And Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Sally T. Sweeney and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Dol

834 F.2d 1029 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 1987

The Benefits Review Board (the Board) affirmed the AU’s findings. Bechtel now petitions this court for review of the Board’s decision. We affirm the Board. I. Background John A. … See Board Order at 3. We uphold the determination of the Board.

Sims v. District of Columbia

531 A.2d 648 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1987

See American Federation of Gov’t Employees v. Barry, 459 A.2d 1045, 1048 (D.C.1983). In enacting the CMPA, the D.C. … The Board of Trustees itself is appointed by a panel consisting of three judges plus the Mayor. § 1-2703(b).

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. United States Department of Energy

141 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2001

See, e.g., Ralph Hoar & Assocs. v. … Cotton v. Heyman, 63 F.3d 1115, 1120 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Tax Analysts v. United States Dep't of Justice, 965 F.2d 1092, 1095 (D.C.Cir.1992)).

Stanton Ex Rel. K.T. v. District of Columbia

680 F. Supp. 2d 201 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2010

Brown ex rel. E.M. v. District of Columbia, 568 F.Supp.2d 44, 50 (D.D.C.2008). The party challenging the administrative decision carries the burden of “persuading the court that the hearing officer was wrong.” … See Brown, 568 F.Supp.2d at 53-54 . See also Friendship Edison v.

Government of Rwanda v. Rwanda Working Group

227 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 27, 2002

(quoting Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.1958)). In Brown , the D.C. … Brown, 253 F.2d at 40 .

Margot Ellen Reiner v. United States of America

686 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1982

Reiner v. United States, Civil Action No. 78-0616, slip op. at 6 (D.D.C. April 30, 1979) (“Reiner I”). … Reiner v. United States, Civil Action No. 81-0794, slip op. at 5 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1981) (“Reiner II").

United States ex rel. Stevens v. Richards

33 App. D.C. 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1909

Manion v. District Comrs. 6 Mackey, 409 , and in United States ex rel. Roop v. Douqlass. 8 Mackey, 99 . … Griffin v. United States, 30 App. D. C. 291.

Sobey v. Holsclaw

28 App. D.C. 65 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1906

In Hisey v. Peters, 6 App. D. … In Luger v. Browning, 21 App. D.

Barry v. United States Capitol Guide Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2009

Mere knowledge by one member of the Board, i.e., Livingood's knowledge, is not enough to demonstrate that the Board undertook its action for retaliatory reasons. 10 See Carpenter v. Fed. … Mary's Honor Ctr. v.

United States v. Bryan

72 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1947

Somewhat similar subpoenas were held valid in Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 138 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 ; and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U.S. 478, 483 , 33 S.Ct. 158 , 57 L.Ed. 309 . … Finally, in the case of United States v. Edward K.

Wilson v. CARCO Group, Inc.

518 F.3d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 2008

Before: TATEL, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: Derek T. … See Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 903 (D.C.