Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

6.81s

  • Alston v. Geithner

    950 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2013

    P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986); Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … Strong support for the Treasury’s decision lies in the two documents that the Board was able to locate.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Commercial Telegraphers' Union, A. F. L. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

    53 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 1943

    conditions, it is altered by the Board itself. … Co. v. System Federation, etc., 300 U.S. 515 , at page 552, 57 S.Ct. 592 , at page 601, 81 L.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Alan McConnell v. Howard University

    818 F.2d 58 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1987

    See, e.g., Smith v. … .”); Lowe v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • In Re Dulansey

    606 A.2d 189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1992

    See Gibson v. … In this case, the Board found no mitigating factors, and respondent has not challenged that finding in this proceeding. 4 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Alcorn v. Wolfe

    827 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1993

    See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716, 719 , 105 S.Ct. 3401, 3403 , 87 L.Ed.2d 516 (1985); Cuyler v. Adams, 449 U.S. 433, 438 , 101 S.Ct. 703, 706-07 , 66 L.Ed.2d 641 (1981). … See McComb v. Wambaugh, 934 F.2d 474, 479 (3rd Cir.1991); Kansas City Area *53 Transp. Auth. v. State of Missouri, 640 F.2d 173, 174 (8th Cir.1981).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Southern Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Southern Railway Company

    337 F.2d 127 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 1964

    And see Switchmen's Union of North America v. … Virginian Railway Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Potomac Electric Power Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Terry M. Cross

    606 F.2d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 24, 1979

    Co. of Boston v. … See, e. g., Dugger v. Jacksonville Shipyards, 8 B.R.B.S. 552 (1978); Brandt v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 8 B.R.B.S. 698 (1978).

    Reversed on other grounds by Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 449 U.S. 268 (1980)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • SATELLITE 8301123 v. Hodel

    648 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 1986

    When analyzing a decision under the arbitrary and capricious standard, the Court need only inquire whether the Board’s action in rejecting plaintiffs’ applications had a rational basis. Ethyl Corp. v. … Consideration of materials not in the administrative record is improper in this review as to whether the Board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bangor & Aroostock Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

    253 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1966

    Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711, 739-740 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 . … The authorities on these points were thoroughly reviewed by Judge Sirica of this Court in United States v. Hanrahan, D.C., 248 F.Supp. 471 , and by Judge Wilson of the Eastern District of Tennessee, in United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Walls v. United States

    601 A.2d 54 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1991

    Brown, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 398 , 428 F.2d 1100 (1970), as adopted by this court in Glenn v. United States, 391 A.2d 772, 774-76 (D.C.1978). … As the motions judge recognized, Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 401-02, 428 F.2d at 1103-04 , was binding authority when appellant pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. M.A.P. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. U.S. Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2013

    ) HOWARD BRYAN ) also known as Paul Smith, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … /s/ KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge DATE: August 12, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dobyns v. United States

    30 A.3d 155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2011

    In this appeal, citing Brown v. … Brown, 35 App.D.C. at 555 .

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • New York New York, LLC v. NLRB

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2012

    But this Court concluded that the Board had not adequately explained its reasoning. See New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 313 F.3d 585, 588 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … ITT Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 413 F.3d 64, 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (quoting NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. United States

    509 A.2d 614 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1986

    United States v. … He's got on a brown jacket. The other one's got a brown jacket on, blue [unintelligible,] a red white and blue knit cap. I'm gonna check em out anyway.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Berrigan v. Sigler

    499 F.2d 514 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 1974

    Zemel v. … Worthy v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gerald Eiland

    738 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 2013

    See United States v. Brown, 508 F.3d 1066, 1068 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … See United States v. Hampton, 718 F.3d 978, 981–83 (D.C. Cir. 2013); see id. at 985–86 (Brown, J., concurring).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Dong v. Smithsonian Institution

    878 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1995

    Id.; see also Cotton v. Adams, March 18, 1992 Hearing, supra. Further, the Board of Directors are either themselves federal officials or else are selected by federal officials. … Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 917 F.2d 581 (D.C.Cir. 1990). 7 . Pacific Legal Foundation v. Council on Environmental Quality, 636 F.2d 1259 (D.C.Cir.1980). 8 . Dickson v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Margaret Dong v. Smithsonian Institution, Hirshhorn Museum & Sculpture Garden, 125 F.3d 877 (1997)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Nagy v. United States

    471 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 1979

    The failure to follow-up claim is not barred by the “incident to service” test, plaintiff argues, citing United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954). … Brown is inapposite here because in that case the suit was based solely on an injury occurring after the soldier had been discharged. In Schwartz v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sykes v. United States

    897 A.2d 769 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2006

    Chambers v. Mississippi 410 U.S. 284, 294 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973); see also Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 19 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967). … Castellon v. United States, 864 A.2d 141 , 159-60 (D.C.2004) (citing Bassil v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.