Case law

Brown v. Brown

44 Iowa 349 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 18, 1876

It was expressly held in Gebhard v.

Brown v. Brown

245 S.W.2d 995 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 1951

Eckford v. Knox, 67 Tex. 200 , 2 S.W. 372 ; Preusse v. McLerran, Tex.Civ.App., 282 S.W. 293 ; Bell v. Thomsen, 116 Tex. 325 , 273 S.W. 1109 . … Brown v. Payne, 142 Tex. 102 , 176 S.W.2d 306 ; Sanderson v. Sanderson, 130 Tex. 264 , 109 S.W.2d 744 .

American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1841 v. United States Department of Defense

682 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, D. Nevada · Mar 30, 1988

Columbia Power Trades Council v. United States Dep’t of Energy, 671 F.2d 325 (1982); National Fed’n of Fed. Employees, Local 1263 v. Commandant, Defense Language Inst., 493 F.Supp. 675 (N.D.Cal.1980). … Brown, 680 F.2d 722 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1104 , 103 S.Ct. 728 , 74 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983), and Local 2855, AFGE v. United States, 602 F.2d 574 (3d Cir.1979).

Brown v. Brown

130 Neb. 487 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1936

Brown brought this suit to secure a decree of divorce. Kathleen Brown, the wife, contested the right of the plaintiff to such a decree. … Kerker v. Kerker, 113 Neb. 653 , 204 N. W. 207 ; Peckham v. Peckham, 111 Neb. 340 , 196 N. W. 628 ; DeVore v. DeVore, 104 Neb. 702 , 178 N. W. 621 , and numerous other cases announce this rule.

Brown v. Brown

278 S.C. 43 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 19, 1982

Major v. Major, 286 S. E. (2d) 666, 1982 . The evidence showed that Mr. Brown knew at the time of the divorce his income would progressively decrease. Moreover, the decrease in proportion to his total income was small. … Darden v. Witham, 258 S. C. 380, 188 S. E. (2d) 776 (1972); S. C. Code Ann. § 20-3-170 (Supp. 1980). Without a proper showing of altered circumstances, the court had no authority to modify the alimony payments. Darden .

Brown v. Brown

148 Conn. App. 13 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Feb 4, 2014

BROWN v. NANCY BROWN (AC 34314) Beach, Alvord and Sullivan, Js. … Brown, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his mar- riage to the defendant, Nancy Brown.

Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors

263 Cal. App. 2d 41 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1968

They rely upon Adler v. … Although the Brown Act artificially classifies it as a legislative body, a board of supervisors actually performs legislative, executive and even quasi-judicial functions. (Chinn v.

Brown v. Brown

274 So. 3d 1208 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 19, 2019

Brown, sued the appellee, Kali D. Brown (the mother of their minor children) for the allegedly-unauthorized use of his Social Security number, violation of his constitutional privacy rights, and identity theft. … The face of the complaint and undisputed pleadings, however, reveal that the complaint was based exclusively on the appellee's use of Devon Brown's name and Social Security number to enforce his child support obligations

Brown v. Brown

13 Ill. App. 2d 56 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 26, 1957

Brown v. Brown

235 Ind. 563 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1956

Cox v. Arnsmann, 76 Ind. 210 ; Tinkler v. Swaynie, 71 Ind. 562 ; 1 Perry Trusts, section 166, 2 Pom. Eq. … Baker v. Leathers, 3 Ind. 558 ; Hileman v. Hileman, 85 Ind. 1 ; Noe v. Roll, 134 Ind. 115 ; Lewis v. Stanley, 148 Ind. 351 .” See also: Ray v. Baker (1905), 165 Ind. 74, 84 , 74 N. E. 619 .

Brown v. Brown

66 Me. 316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1876

Wyman v. Brown, 50 Maine, 139. And the grantor may “reserve full power and control over the land thus conveyed during his natural life.” Drown v. Smith, 52 Maine, 141; but not over the deed. … But in Cook v. Brown, 34 N. H., 460, after a very elaborate discussion and thorough examination of authorities, Shed v.

Brown v. Brown

274 So. 3d 1208 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 19, 2019

Brown, sued the appellee, Kali D. Brown (the mother of their minor children) for the allegedly-unauthorized use of his Social Security number, violation of his constitutional privacy rights, and identity theft. … The face of the complaint and undisputed pleadings, however, reveal that the complaint was based exclusively on the appellee's use of Devon Brown's name and Social Security number to enforce his child support obligations

Brown v. Brown

44 S.C. 378 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 10, 1895

Brown.” The law of nudum pactum is inapplicable to instruments under seal. The very fact of having a seal attached imports a consideration. See Carter v. King, 11 Rich., 133 . … Winsmith v. Winsmith, 15 S. C., 611; Childs v. Frasee, Ibid., 612; Bratton v. Massey, 18 Id., 559; Lake v. Shumate, 20 Id., 34; Scott v. Alexander, 23 Id., 126. In this case we fail to see any abuse of that discretion.

Brown v. Brown

76 Ark. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 27, 2002

Appellant, David Brown, XJ^and appellee, Janet Brown, were divorced in 1993. In 2001, Janet filed a motion for contempt and for an increase in child support. … In Tucker v. Tucker, 74 Ark.

Brown v. Brown

66 Conn. 493 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 19, 1895

Wms., 182; 2 Story’s Eq., § 1040e; 8 Pomeroy’s Eq., § 1287; Fitzgerald v. Vestal, 4 Sneed (Tenn.), 258; Parmelee v. Cameron, 41 N. Y., 392 ; Jenkins v. Stetson, 4 Allen, 128 . … Todd v. Munson, 53 Conn., 579, 589 ; Vail’s Appeal, 37 id., 185, 198; Dean v. Dean, 6 id., 285, 287. As there was no fraud practiced on their mother this case does not come within the rule laid down in Dowd v.

Brown v. Brown

521 S.W.2d 730 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 1975

CURTISS BROWN, Justice. This is a divorce case. Lisa McArdle Brown (appellee) filed suit for divorce on June 20, 1974. Robert Dwayne Brown (appellant) was served with citation on or about September 3, 1974. … Brown then perfected this appeal.

Brown v. Brown

329 Ill. 198 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1928

(Parker v. Gray, 317 Ill. 468 ; Murdock v. Murdock, 219 id. 123; Hessick v. Hessick, 169 id. 486; Achilles v. Achilles, 151 id. 136; Taylor v. Taylor, 144 id. 436.) … (Hessick v. Hessick, supra; Mines v. Phee, 254 Ill. 60 ; Murdock v. Murdock, supra.)

Brown v. Brown

237 Ga. 201 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jul 9, 1976

In Githens v. … Also see Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 ( 215 SE2d 471 ) (1975). In Jardine v.

Brown v. Brown

33 L.R.A. 816 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 2, 1895

Brown v. Brown

379 S.C. 271 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 28, 2008

See Pool v. … Brown v. Brown, Op. No.2008-UP-051 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Jan. 14, 2008) (unpublished opinion). 2 . We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.