Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.65s
782 S.E.2d 121 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished3 N.C. 159 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1802
. — On the second point, see Delamothe v. Lanier , 4 N.C. 296 .
Cited 0 timesPublished77 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1877
Cited: Cheek v. Nall , 112 N.C. 374 . (42)
Cited 0 timesPublished201 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1931
R. v. Kitchin, 91 N. … See Bank v. Liles, 197 N. C., 413 , 149 S.
Cited 0 timesPublished201 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1931
R. v. … R. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 N.C. 52 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1924
Ketchie v. Hedrick, 186 N. C., 392 ; Aldrich v. Bank, 176 U. S., 618 ; Hope v. City of Alton, 214 Ill., 102 ; People v. Fields, 58 N. Y., 491 ; Hill Dredging Company v. Venton City, 77 N. J. Eq., 467; Jones v. … Stevens et al. v. Smathers, 124 N. C., 571 ; Raulf v. Light Co., p. 176 N. C., 691 ; Hipp v. Farrell, 169 N. C., 551, 554 ; Hough v. R. R., 144 N. C., 692 ; Banking and Trust Company v.
Cited 16 timesPublished116 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895
BROWN." … The doctrine laid down in Stone v. Marshall , 52 N.C. 300 , was overruled by Morris v. Pearson , 79 N.C. 253 . There is error also in his Honor's having given number 11 of plaintiff's prayer for instruction.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 N.C. 154 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893
Brown and the plaintiff, growing out of their copartnership dealings. … It is not unlike the reference in Gudger v. Baird, 66 N. C., 438 , in which the order is in these words: “ This case is referred to W. M.
Cited 0 timesPublished85 N.C. 477 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1881
McKee v. Lineberger, 69 N. C., 217 .
Cited 0 timesPublished125 N.C. 606 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1899
In Burnett v. Railway Co., 120 N. C., 517 , this Court considered thq question in all its bearings, and cited a long list of tbe cases. We were not favored with an argument in behalf of tbe prisoner.
Cited 0 timesPublished129 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1901
On May the 8th, 1900, the defendant appealed from an order made by the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, granting certain changes in the public road over the lands of the defendant. … Boing v. Railroad , 88 N.C. 62 ; Hahn v. Latham , 87 N.C. 172 .
Cited 0 timesPublished228 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1947
Brown, and driven by his codefendant, John K. Dawson, collided with the bicycles on which Paul Rouse, Lee Bell and George Rouse were riding. … Phillips v. Nessmith , 226 N.C. 173 , 37 S.E.2d 178 ; Wall v. Bain , 222 N.C. 375 , 23 S.E.2d 330 ; Pearson v. Luther , 212 N.C. 412 , 193 S.E. 739 ; Lincoln v. R. R. , 207 N.C. 787 , 178 S.E. 601 .
Cited 0 timesPublished2 N.C. 107 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1794
Cited: Davis v. Wilkinson, post , 336; Smith v. Fagan , 13 N.C. 302 .
Cited 0 timesPublished237 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1953
Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E. 2d 137 ; Bass v. Wholesale Corp., 212 N.C. 252 , 193 S.E. 1 ; Beach v. McLean, 219 N.C. 521 , 14 S.E. 2d 515 ; McCraw v. Mills, Inc., 233 N.C. 524 , 64 S.E. 2d 658 ; Wood v. … Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688 , 32 S.E. 2d 209 ; Ingram v. Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc., 225 N.C. 444 , 35 S.E. 2d 337 ; Caulder v. Gresham, 224 N.C. 402 , 30 S.E. 2d 312 ; Samuels v.
Cited 14 timesPublished361 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2006
allowed for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished83 N.C. 684 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1880
Neither was the undertaking given in time, nor the appeal prosecuted as required by the rules of this court, as determined in Sever v. McLaughlin, 82 N. C., 342 , and Smith v. Lyon, Ibid., 2. Per Curiam.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1812
In the case of Henry v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedText from a scan197 N.C. 204 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 15, 1929
Rendleman v. Stoessel, 195 N. C., 640 , 143 S. E., 219 . This is what the defendants are trying to accord the plaintiffs in the present suit. It is all they are entitled to receive. … Bank v. Klugg, 186 U. S., 202 . This distinguishes the instant case from Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U. S., 248 , strongly relied on by plaintiffs.
Cited 0 timesPublished192 N.C. 470 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1926
V. Brown, southward over the land of defendant, G. W. Mobley, to Mill Swamp public road, at or near the dividing corner between the lands of the said Mobley and W. V. … Brown, on said public road near the Brown schoolhouse.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna