Case law

Sexton v. Brown

36 Ill. App. 281 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 28, 1890

This evidence is contradicted by one of the Browns and their drayman, North, who say the flour was delivered. … Without the preliminary proof it was not competent to use the book in evidence as to the entries not made by appellee, Brown.

Brown v. Bayless

340 Ill. App. 223 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 14, 1950

Mullen v. Brown

48 Ill. App. 592 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 3, 1893

Youle v. Brown

49 Ill. App. 102 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 6, 1893

City of Pekin v. Winkel, 77 Ill. 58 . The judgment will be affirmed.

People v. Brown

192 Ill. App. 483 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 28, 1915

Brown v. Satterlee

296 Ill. App. 635 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 13, 1938

Crawford v. Brown

252 Ill. App. 651 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 1929

Norris v. Brown

13 Ill. App. 606 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 23, 1883

Brown v. Krause

30 Ill. App. 360 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 13, 1889

Dodd, who was the senior partner of the firm of Dodd, Brown & Co., to whom at the time of the sale to Kranse the plantation belonged, the title being, it seems, in Brown for the firm, came to the place, and by agreement then … made between Krause and Dodd, Krause abandoned everything he had upon the plantation, made a bill of sale to Dodd, Brown & Co. of the sugar and molasses of the crop of 1884, and that Dodd accepted this abandonment and bill

Bitner v. Brown

254 Ill. App. 626 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 11, 1929

Haentze v. Brown

193 Ill. App. 288 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 9, 1915

Yunt v. Brown

2 Ill. 264 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The defendant Brown sued out a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court, and the plaintiff, on its return, moved to quash the same for having been improvidently issued.

Brown v. Knower

2 Ill. 469 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1838

Judgment having been entered against Brown, Field not having been served with process, the question is now made, whether the action can be sustained against Brown, in its present form. … See Humphreys v. Collier et al. Ante 47.

The PEOPLE v. Brown

16 Ill. 2d 482 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 1959

(People v. Sanders, 357 Ill. 610 .) … People v. Arbuckle, 413 Ill. 441 ; People v. Del Prete, 395 Ill. 110 ; People v. Kozlowski, 370 Ill. 639 ; People v. Bridgewater, 369 Ill. 633 .

People v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 2024

Brown Jr. was charged with five counts of cyberstalking and harassment. … The State relies on People v.

Brown v. State

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 287 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 10, 1942

Brown, is successor to W. S. Osborne, and is the present duly elected, qualified and acting sheriff of Marshall County.

Brown v. State

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 338 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 12, 1943

An award is therefore entered in favor of claimant, Carl Brown, for the sum of One Hundred Seventy-three and 25/100 Dollars ($173.25).

People v. Brown

71 Ill. App. 2d 432 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 7, 1966

Vette v. Brown

244 Ill. App. 635 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 14, 1927

Christy v. Brown

248 Ill. App. 655 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 9, 1928