Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.16s
Delaware v. Surface Transportation Board
859 F.3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2017
Emerson v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co., 503 F.3d 1126, 1129 (10th Cir. 2007); see also Fayus Enters. v. BNSF Ry. Co., 602 F.3d 444, 451 (D.C. Cir. 2010); Wedemeyer v. … In Wyeth v.
Vacated on other grounds by Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 377 (2017)Cited 25 timesPublished325 A.2d 452 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1974
PER CURIAM: This cause comes to the court upon application for review of an Order of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and was briefed by counsel. … Here the period of time within which to apply to this court for review of determinations of the Board of Elections is prescribed by the Congress.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp.
821 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993
See Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 . … When an agency interprets an ambiguous statutory provision, the second prong of Chevron, U.S.A. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSherman v. Physical Therapists Examining Board
208 A.2d 728 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1965
Watson v. State of Maryland, 218 U.S. 173, 177 , 30 S.Ct. 644, 646 , 54 L.Ed. 987 (1910). … See Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 227 U.S. 88 , 33 S.Ct. 185 , 57 L.Ed. 431 (1913).
Cited 5 timesPublishedMarshall v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
377 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1977
In Hickenbottom v. … Hollingsworth v. District of Columbia Unemp. Comp. Bd., supra note 5; General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 354 A.2d 529 (1976). . Hilton Hotels Corp. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRogers v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
290 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1972
[Yeager v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa.Super. 162 , 173 A.2d 802, 804-805 (1961).] [Emphasis supplied.] See Holmes v. Cook, 45 Ala.App. 688 , 236 So.2d 352, 358-59 (1970). … Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 110 (1970), aff’d — U.S.App.D.C. — (No. 24,695, decided January 28, 1972). Affirmed.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011
Appx. 749, 752 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Brown, No. 01-cr-10012 (W.D. La. Apr. 8, 2003). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2011
BROWN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … See FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies with the district court to grant unopposed motion to dismiss as conceded pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDevine V. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
101 A.3d 1235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 2014
Pagliei v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 A.3d 24, 26 (Pa.Cmwlth.2012); Jackson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 933 A.2d 155, 157 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007). … Poola v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 520 Pa. 562 , 555 A.2d 97, 99 (1989); Lopata v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 507 Pa. 570 , 493 A.2d 657, 661 (1985). In Martin v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedOld Dominion Dairy Products, Inc. v. Brown
471 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1979
Keco Industries, Inc. v. United States, 492 F.2d 1200, 1205 , 203 Ct.Cl. 566 (1974); Warren Brothers Roads Co. v. United States, 355 F.2d 612, 615 , 173 Ct.Cl. 714 (1965). … of Regents v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States v. Dorian Michael Brown
567 F.2d 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1977
See, e. g., United States v. Ortiz, 496 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Prieto-Olivas, 419 F.2d 149, 151 (5th Cir. 1969). Similarly, subsequent events may illuminate the issue of predisposition. … United States v. Gallo, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 214 , 543 F.2d 361, 364-65 (1976).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2010
BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action … ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Michael Brown
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
799 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1992
Contrast Zacchini v. … See Booth v. Curtis Pub.
Cited 8 timesPublishedKlayman v. Board on Professional Responsibility
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2025
Kennedy v. Educ. … See Banov v.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1995
Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 821 F.Supp. 20 (D.D.C.1993), reprinted in J.A. 2911. Finally, on March 1, 1994, the District Court awarded the Players' counsel $1,744,578.41 in attorney's fees. Brown v. … NCAA v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Children's National Medical Center
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2011
See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sim, No. 03-2655, 2005 WL 3276190, at *4 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2005); Elliott v. Healthcare Corp., 629 A.2d 6, 9 (D.C. 1993); see also Duncan v. Children’s Nat’l Med.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDodson v. United States Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022
Dodson gave Brown the January 19 note from his physician, but Brown requested that Dodson provide a note excusing him, specifically, for January 20 and 21. … If the Board approves the termination or fails to act on it within 30 days of receiving the Chief’s 17 notice, “the Board shall be deemed to have approved the termination
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010
BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F. Supp. 2d 122 (D.D.C. 2009). … Atchinson v. Dist. of Columbia, 73 F.3d 418, 425 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. 3 Brown also moves to supplement his motion for reconsideration and leave to amend.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Surface Transportation Board
175 F.3d 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1999
See Skaggs v. … See Grainbelt Corp. v. STB, 109 F.3d 794 , 796 n. 1 (1997); Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782 , 784 n. 1 (1997); Consolidated Rail Corp. v. STB, 93 F.3d 793, 794 (1996); Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSobin v. D.C. Board of Elections
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2024
Code § 1-1001.11(b)(2); see also Jackson v. D.C. … In Bates v. D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna