Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Delaware v. Surface Transportation Board

    859 F.3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2017

    Emerson v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co., 503 F.3d 1126, 1129 (10th Cir. 2007); see also Fayus Enters. v. BNSF Ry. Co., 602 F.3d 444, 451 (D.C. Cir. 2010); Wedemeyer v. … In Wyeth v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 377 (2017)Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Elections

    325 A.2d 452 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1974

    PER CURIAM: This cause comes to the court upon application for review of an Order of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and was briefed by counsel. … Here the period of time within which to apply to this court for review of determinations of the Board of Elections is prescribed by the Congress.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp.

    821 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993

    See Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 . … When an agency interprets an ambiguous statutory provision, the second prong of Chevron, U.S.A. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

    208 A.2d 728 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1965

    Watson v. State of Maryland, 218 U.S. 173, 177 , 30 S.Ct. 644, 646 , 54 L.Ed. 987 (1910). … See Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 227 U.S. 88 , 33 S.Ct. 185 , 57 L.Ed. 431 (1913).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    377 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 1977

    In Hickenbottom v. … Hollingsworth v. District of Columbia Unemp. Comp. Bd., supra note 5; General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 354 A.2d 529 (1976). . Hilton Hotels Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    290 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1972

    [Yeager v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 196 Pa.Super. 162 , 173 A.2d 802, 804-805 (1961).] [Emphasis supplied.] See Holmes v. Cook, 45 Ala.App. 688 , 236 So.2d 352, 358-59 (1970). … Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 110 (1970), aff’d — U.S.App.D.C. — (No. 24,695, decided January 28, 1972). Affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

    Appx. 749, 752 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Brown, No. 01-cr-10012 (W.D. La. Apr. 8, 2003). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2011

    BROWN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … See FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies with the district court to grant unopposed motion to dismiss as conceded pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Devine V. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    101 A.3d 1235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 2014

    Pagliei v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 37 A.3d 24, 26 (Pa.Cmwlth.2012); Jackson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 933 A.2d 155, 157 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007). … Poola v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 520 Pa. 562 , 555 A.2d 97, 99 (1989); Lopata v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 507 Pa. 570 , 493 A.2d 657, 661 (1985). In Martin v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Old Dominion Dairy Products, Inc. v. Brown

    471 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1979

    Keco Industries, Inc. v. United States, 492 F.2d 1200, 1205 , 203 Ct.Cl. 566 (1974); Warren Brothers Roads Co. v. United States, 355 F.2d 612, 615 , 173 Ct.Cl. 714 (1965). … of Regents v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Dorian Michael Brown

    567 F.2d 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1977

    See, e. g., United States v. Ortiz, 496 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1974); United States v. Prieto-Olivas, 419 F.2d 149, 151 (5th Cir. 1969). Similarly, subsequent events may illuminate the issue of predisposition. … United States v. Gallo, 177 U.S.App.D.C. 214 , 543 F.2d 361, 364-65 (1976).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2010

    BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action … ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Michael Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

    799 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1992

    Contrast Zacchini v. … See Booth v. Curtis Pub.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Klayman v. Board on Professional Responsibility

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 2025

    Kennedy v. Educ. … See Banov v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

    50 F.3d 1041 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1995

    Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 821 F.Supp. 20 (D.D.C.1993), reprinted in J.A. 2911. Finally, on March 1, 1994, the District Court awarded the Players' counsel $1,744,578.41 in attorney's fees. Brown v. … NCAA v. Board of Regents, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Children's National Medical Center

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2011

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sim, No. 03-2655, 2005 WL 3276190, at *4 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2005); Elliott v. Healthcare Corp., 629 A.2d 6, 9 (D.C. 1993); see also Duncan v. Children’s Nat’l Med.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. United States Capitol Police

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2022

    Dodson gave Brown the January 19 note from his physician, but Brown requested that Dodson provide a note excusing him, specifically, for January 20 and 21. … If the Board approves the termination or fails to act on it within 30 days of receiving the Chief’s 17 notice, “the Board shall be deemed to have approved the termination

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

    BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F. Supp. 2d 122 (D.D.C. 2009). … Atchinson v. Dist. of Columbia, 73 F.3d 418, 425 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Williamsburg Wax Museum, Inc. v. 3 Brown also moves to supplement his motion for reconsideration and leave to amend.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Surface Transportation Board

    175 F.3d 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1999

    See Skaggs v. … See Grainbelt Corp. v. STB, 109 F.3d 794 , 796 n. 1 (1997); Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782 , 784 n. 1 (1997); Consolidated Rail Corp. v. STB, 93 F.3d 793, 794 (1996); Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sobin v. D.C. Board of Elections

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2024

    Code § 1-1001.11(b)(2); see also Jackson v. D.C. … In Bates v. D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.