Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1928

10,000+ results

1.27s

  • Velez-Diaz v. Vega-Irizarry

    421 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Sep 2, 2005

    We will, therefore, address this issue in our qualified immunity analysis. … Finally, we must determine "whether a 'reasonable officer, similarly situated, would understand that the challenged conduct violated' the clearly established right at issue." Id.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Smith

    921 S.W.2d 39 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1996

    doctrine are unconstitutional as applied to the wrongful death statute; and c) there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the public duty, official immunity and qualified immunity doctrines are applicable. … Government officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Butler v. City of Prairie Village

    974 F. Supp. 1386 · District Court, D. Kansas · Aug 25, 1997

    Qualified Immunity, i. Standard. Qualified immunity provides immunity from suit, not merely from liability. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2815-16 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). … “Ordinarily, in order for the law to be clearly established, there must be a Supreme Court or Tenth Circuit decision on point, or the clearly established weight of authority from other courts must have found the law to be

    Reversed in part by Butler v. City of Prairie Village, 172 F.3d 736 (1999)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Moore

    62 F.4th 912 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 16, 2023

    The school officials sought dismissal on qualified-immunity grounds, arguing that the state-created danger doctrine was not clearly established in this circuit when the underlying events occurred. … “The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Poulsen v. City of North Tonawanda, NY

    811 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 26, 1993

    sufficient to defeat appellants’ qualified immunity. … Lloyd Graves is not entitled to qualified immunity from liability under § 1983.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Caddell v. Campbell

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 28, 2021

    Separately, he argues that even if a jailor could bear legal liability in that setting, it was not clearly established that a jailor could, and thus qualified immunity is warranted. (Id. at #209–213). … To succeed on his qualified immunity defense, on the other hand, Jones must establish that Cadell failed to allege that Jones’s “conduct violated a constitutional right that was clearly established law at the time.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Willis v. Neal

    247 F. App'x 738 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 7, 2007

    Willis also bears the burden of establishing that the defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity. Smoak v. Hall, 460 F.3d 768, 778 (6th Cir.2006). … This court has previously held, as did the district court, that Tennessee law provides qualified or good faith immunity of government employees for state law torts. Rogers v.

    Cited 6 timesUnpublished
  • Dean v. Childs

    262 Mich. App. 48 · Michigan Court of Appeals · May 13, 2004

    involved ‘clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’ ” 11 If no constitutional violation occurred, the defendant has qualified immunity from liability. 12 “Qualified immunity … Childs claims common-law immunity under the public duty doctrine.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Dean v. Childs, 474 Mich. 914 (2005)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Gibson v. Rich

    44 F.3d 274 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 30, 1995

    Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … In suits alleging illegal arrest, the qualified immunity determination turns on whether a reasonable officer could have believed the arrest to be lawful, in light of clearly established law and the information the officer

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Weaver v. State of California

    63 Cal. App. 4th 188 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1998

    Defendants also asserted immunity under the qualified immunity doctrine, alleging that they are shielded from liability unless their actions violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … was reasonable and that the qualified immunity doctrine applied.”

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Sauls v. Montgomery County

    18 S.W.3d 310 · Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · May 18, 2000

    Therefore, in view of the confusion regarding the terms, “official immunity” and “qualified immunity,” it is not clear from the record that appellees presented the affirmative defense of “qualified immunity” to the trial … Thus, we do not consider the merit of “qualified immunity” as a ground for summary judgment in favor of Williams, individually.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brindley v. Best

    192 F.3d 525 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 22, 1999

    Qualified Immunity Government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional … clearly established rights.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • López-Quiñones v. Puerto Rico National Guard

    526 F.3d 23 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 21, 2008

    Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 , 100 S.Ct. 1287 , 63 L.Ed.2d 574 (1980), and that in any event, defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because any such protection was not clearly established at the time of Lopez’ termination … Still remaining is the question whether his status was clearly established at the time of his termination.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Tryon v. Town of North Branford

    58 Conn. App. 702 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Jul 11, 2000

    The doctrine that determines the tort liability of municipal employees is well established. “ ‘Although municipalities are generally immune from liability in tort, municipal employees historically were personally liable for … Andrews, supra, 211 Conn. 507 -508, in which our Supreme Court discussed the identifiable person-imminent harm exception to the general rule of qualified governmental immunity.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Visser v. Magnarelli

    542 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, N.D. New York · Jul 9, 1982

    Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 , 100 S.Ct. 1920, 1924 , 64 L.Ed.2d 572 (1980), clearly requires a defendant to plead a defense of qualified immunity, as defendants-councilors have done here. … Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 899-900 (5th Cir. 1982) (violation of clearly established state law vitiates objective prong of good faith immunity defense).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Berryman v. Niceta

    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jul 8, 2025

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … those rights were clearly established at the time.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Housing Works, Inc. v. Giuliani

    56 F. App'x 530 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 3, 2003

    right to be free from such conduct was not clearly established at the time of the conduct; or (3) if the defendant’s action was objectively reasonable in light of the legal rules clearly established at the time it was taken … established and consequently, a defendant against such a claim is entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Meredith v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

    177 F.3d 1042 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 1999

    Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) (restricting qualified immunity protection to actions where official conduct did not violate a clearly established legal right), such immunity does not extend to a suit seeking equitable … of a clearly established right, the lexical priority of the inquiries are identical.

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Dawkins v. Graham

    50 F.3d 532 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 14, 1995

    Qualified immunity does not shield the officers from a lawsuit for damages if a reasonable officer would have known the officers’ actions violated clearly established law. Hummel-Jones v. … First, the law prohibiting the officers’ conduct was clearly established at the time of the raid.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Taconic Developmental Disabilities Services Office

    57 F. App'x 9 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 2, 2002

    ‘good faith’ qualified immunity cannot attach.” … ’t do it’ or that it was objectively reasonable for him to believe that his action did not violate clearly established law.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.