Case law

John F. English v. John Cunningham

269 F.2d 517 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1959

Co. v. System Federation No. 40, 300 U.S. 515, 552 , 57 S.Ct. 592 , 81 L.Ed. 789 ; and see Green v. … Ne%v Convention.

United States v. Guillen

561 F.3d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 14, 2009

Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fleming, 239 F.3d 761, 763-64, (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1327 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam); Teeter, 257 F.3d at 25 n.9-n.10; United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 403 (4th Cir. 2000); United States v.

Family Const. v. DC DEPT. OF C. & R. AFFAIRS

484 A.2d 250 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1984

See, e.g., Tower v. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276, 1280 (D.C.1980) (citations omitted).

Wilson v. Mabus

65 F. Supp. 3d 127 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). An adverse employment action usually inflicts "tangible economic harm," but this was not the case for plaintiff, Douglas, 559 F.3d at 552 (citing Forkkio v. … Hamilton v. Geithner, 666 F.3d 1344, 1357 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (intemal citations omitted); see also Jones v. Bernanke 557 F.3d 670, 677 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

American Insurance Association v. Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency

865 F.2d 278 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1989

The Comptroller was obliged, this argument concludes, to defer his final approval pending the Board’s resolution of that issue. Although the Board has exclusive jurisdiction to administer the BHCA, Whitney Nat’l Bank v. … It is perfectly clear, however, that the Comptroller, if he so chooses, may condition any approval on subsequent action by the Board. See, e.g., Gravois Bank v. Board of Governors, 478 F.2d 546, 548 (8th Cir.1973).

Columbia Textile Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

917 F.2d 62 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1990

COLUMBIA TEXTILE SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1363. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 30, 1990. Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, STEPHEN F. … The Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence, consistent with agency precedent and without legal error. See Redd-I, Inc., 290 N.L.R.B. No. 140 (1988); see also Sonicraft v.

Lever Bros. Co. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. Lever Bros. Co

204 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1953

In Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. … Panitz v. District of Columbia, 1941, 74 App.D.C. 284 , 122 F.2d 61 ; Eastman Kodak Co. v. District of Columbia, 1942, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 339 , 131 F.2d 347 ; cf. District of Columbia v.

District of Columbia v. Billingsley

667 A.2d 837 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1995

Safeway Stores, Inc., 225 A.2d 312, 314 (D.C.1967) (quoting from Brown v. Alabama Foods, Inc., 190 A.2d 257 (D.C.1963)); see also Hughes v. District of Columbia, 425 A.2d 1299, 1302 (D.C.1981). … Brown's responsibilities were elicited during testimony at trial. 7 .

Director of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Berkstresser

921 F.2d 306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

canvass the entire job market.’ ” Stevens v. … See Crum v.

Geo Feick & Sons Co. v. Blair

26 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1928

This concession is based on the authority of Eaton v. English & Mersick Co. (C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 54 ; Flynn, Collector, v. Hass Bros. (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 510 ; Davidson & Case Lumber Co. v. Motter (D. … of the Board, for lack of proof upon which to base a reversal.

United States v. Wilkins

215 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 2007

However, Brown did not plead guilty to perjury in Wilkins’ case, and appellant points to no false statements in Brown’s testimony during his trial. Wilkins seeks to rely on Brady v. … The District Court thus properly held that “there appears no gap between Brown’s statements and the truth.” United States v. Wilkins, No. 92cr389-02, slip op. at 8 (D.D.C.

Harmon v. Brucker

137 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 1956

Plaintiff then applied unsuccessfully to the Army Discharge Review Board and the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records to have the character of his discharge changed from Undesirable on the ground that his services … See Patterson v. Lamb, 1947, 329 U.S. 539, 542 , 67 S.Ct. 448 , 91 L.Ed. 485 . 5 . United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 1955, 350 U.S. 11 , 76 S.Ct. 1 .

Retail Store Employees Union Local No. 400, Retail Clerks International Association, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board, C. W. F. Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. C. W. F. Corporation

458 F.2d 792 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1972

P 12,418 RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 400, RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFLCIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, C. W. F. Corporation, Intervenor. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. C. W. F. CORPORATION, Respondent. Nos. 71-1137, 71-1255. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 24, 1972. Decided Feb. 14, 1972. Mr.

Matter of Wolff

490 A.2d 1118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1985

See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 , 89 S.Ct. 17 .09, 1711, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). … Freeman v. Commonwealth, 223 Va. 301 , 288 S.E.2d 461, 465 (1982).

Herman v. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

995 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1997

Brown called the National. 1 The day after Mr. Brown’s call, September 12, 1995, more than 250,000 ballots were sent out to APWU members across the country. On October 5, 1995, Chandler won his election. … See DeArment v. Local 563, 751 F.Supp. 1364 (D.Minn. 1990).

Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2011

. v. … . v.

Walter E. Campbell Co., Inc. v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc

48 F. Supp. 3d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2014

Brown, 980 F.2d 747, 747–48 (D.C. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998), quoting Richardson v. Phillip Morris Inc., 950 F. Supp. 700, 702 (D. Md. 1997); see also Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v.

Fox v. District of Columbia

990 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1997

Plaintiffs First Amendment Claim The Supreme Court addressed the parameters of a public employee’s First Amendment rights in Pickering v. Board of Education 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Tygrett v. Barry, 627 F.2d 1279, 1282 (D.C.Cir.1980) (emphasis supplied); see also Brasslett v.

In Re Rosenbleet

592 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1991

See generally United States v. Goldblatt, 813 F.2d 619, 623-624 (3d Cir.1987). We also hold that second-degree fraud under the District of Columbia Code includes, as an essential element, an intent to defraud. … Within certain limits imposed by case law and by rule, the choice of an appropriate sanction in a given case is discretionary with the court or the Board.

Wilcox v. Coe

33 F. Supp. 714 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 1940

It is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office. The testimony of the plaintiff is cumulative. … Globe-Union, Inc., v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co., 7 Cir., 103 F.2d 722, 727 . Our Court of Appeals in Abbott v.