Case law

Hodges v. Board of Parole

111 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1992

McKenzie v. Board of Parole

110 Or. App. 524 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 8, 1992

Petitioner appeals an order of the Board of Parole setting his parole release date. He contends that the Board failed to follow its administrative rules. … At the hearing, the Board imposed two consecutive 6-month terms for petitioner’s remaining two convictions on the basis of petitioner’s Board matrix.

Campbell v. Board of County Commissioners

107 Or. App. 611 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

As we said recently in Sauvie Island Agricultural v. … In Mehring v.

Barrett v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2024

Affirmed. 464 Barrett v. Board of Parole ORTEGA, P. J. … The board’s authority to sum consecutive prison terms is therefore, at minimum, “affected by” or “modified by” ORS 144.079. See Vasquez v.

Beldon v. Board of Parole

87 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 1987

We write for the limited purpose of addressing petitioner’s contention that all five board members should have considered his case when, in fact, “only two board members of the board sat.” … Although a board rule provides that some types of cases must be heard by the full board, this case is not one of them. See OAR 255-30-015O). 1 Affirmed.

Morgan v. Board of Dentistry

118 Or. App. 626 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1993

In Van Gordon v. … In Spray v.

State v. Brown

335 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2024

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 418 State v. Brown SHORR, P. J. … Considering defendant’s argument on its merits, in State v.

Brown v. Collette

342 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 2025

Hannah Brown argued the cause and filed the brief pro se. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. EGAN, J. Reversed and remanded. 516 Brown v. … The court explained it would order father to complete 518 Brown v. Collette a treatment program to address his alcohol use.

State v. Brown

335 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2024

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 418 State v. Brown SHORR, P. J. … Considering defendant’s argument on its merits, in State v.

Beistel v. PUBLIC EMPLOYE RELATIONS BOARD

6 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1971

Warren v. … Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Miesen v. Dept. of Commerce, 3 Or App 251 , 473 P2d 691 (1970).

Clubb v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1992

Petitioner’s sole assignment of error is that the Board “erred in finding petitioner’s sentence expiration date as 5/23/1994.” He asks us to remand to the Board with instructions to correct the sentence expiration date. … The Department of Corrections, not the Board, is responsible for establishing the sentence expiration date. ORS 137.320. The Board is not even required to include the sentence expiration date on the BAF.

Burbank v. Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1988

PER CURIAM The parties agree that the matter for which petitioner seeks judicial review has been corrected by the Board of Parole and that the issues presented are moot. Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Rodriguez v. Board of Parole

91 Or. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of the Parole Board’s order rescinding his parole release date made after his return from an escape, and resetting his parole release date to August 31, 1988. … The Board took that action, which resulted in a 180-day sanction for his escape, without granting him a hearing.

Hernandez v. Brown

346 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025

Nichole BROWN, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. … Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US 83, 93, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020).

Kniss v. Public Employees Retirement Board

184 Or. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 2002

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). In this case, claimant’s sole contention is that the board lacked sufficient reason to reject the opinion of his treating physicians. … See, e.g., Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp., 172 Or App 484, 488-89 , 19 P3d 951 (2001) (no rule of law requires deference to workers’ compensation claimant’s treating physician).

Bell v. Public Employees Retirement Board

239 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 2010

Ellis v. Ferrellgas, L. P., 211 Or App 648, 652, 156 P3d 136 (2007). … The court’s analysis in Loosli v.

Alonzo v. Board of Parole

24 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 1976

In this parole revocation proceeding the state concedes that the petitioner was not allowed to respond to all material considered by the Board and agrees that the Board should hold a further hearing for that purpose.

Menges v. Board of County Commissioners

290 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1980

In Western Amusement v. … See Laubach v. Industrial Indemnity Co., 286 Or 217, 222 , 593 P2d 1146 (1979), and cases cited therein.

Duncan v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1991

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Parole Board, without having sought administrative review of that order. ORS 144.335(1). … He does not claim that the Board gave him incorrect information about appeal procedures. See Jenkins v. Board of Parole (CA A65131), dismissed by order June 6, 1991, rev allowed (September 24, 1991).

Dunham v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1991

At his prison term hearing, the Parole Board established a history/risk score of 2, a crime severity rating of 4 and a matrix range of 32 to 44 months. … It is agreed that, if the Board had applied one standard variation, which is six months, his prison term would have been set at 26 months.