Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

3.53s

  • Brown v. Vick

    23 N.C. App. 404 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1974

    State v. Barnes, 18 N.C. App. 263 , 196 S.E. 2d 576 (1973) ; Midgett v. Midgett, 5 N.C. App. 74 , 168 S.E. 2d 53 (1969) ; State v. Wright, 16 N.C. App. 562 , 192 S.E. 2d 655 (1972). … Hare v. Weil, 213 N.C. 484 , 196 S.E. 869 (1938) ; Paul v. Niece, 244 N.C. 565 , 94 S.E. 2d 596 (1956) ; Ketner v. Rouzer, 11 N.C. App. 483 , 182 S.E. 2d 21 (1971).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Curry v. Brown

    8 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1970

    Clontz v. Krimminger, 253 N.C. 252 , 116 S.E. 2d 804 . … Racine v. Boege, 6 N.C. App. 341 , 169 S.E. 2d 913 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. . Brown

    7 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1819

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Jackson

    179 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 31, 1920

    We agree with the learned counsel that the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company of Virginia is a corporation of the State of North Carolina, and that it was so decided in Staton v. R. … R. v. Spencer , 166 N.C. 522 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Owens

    181 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1921

    Perkins, 9 Pick., 305 ; Bryant v. Lord, 19 Minn., 396 ( Gil., 342 ); Moore v. Locomotive Works, 14 Mich., 266 ; Goebel v. Linn, 47 Mich., 489 ; 11 N. W., 284 ; Rogers v. Rogers, 139 Mass., 440 ; 1 N. E., 122 ; King v. … Cooke v. Murphy, 70 Ill., 96 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rhinehart Bros.

    112 N.C. 772 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

    Rankin v. Allison , 64 N.C. 673 ; Bank v. Frankford , 61 N.C. 199 . … Garrett v. Trotter , 65 N.C. 430 ; The Code, sec. 273.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Thomasson v. Brown

    66 N.C. App. 683 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1984

    It isn’t true that when I came over that hillcrest Vicky Brown’s van was already in South Maple Avenue. When I came over the hill, sir, I told you one time it was coming out of Cameron Street. … Since the jury concluded that defendant Vicky Brown was negligent and that her negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injury, any error committed by the trial judge in excluding this testimony could not have been

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doby v. Brown

    135 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 4, 1955

    Toucey v. New York Life Ins. Co., 314 U.S. 118 , 62 S.Ct. 139 , 86 L.Ed. 100 . The history of that delay is set forth in Brown v. Doby, 242 N.C. 462 , 87 S.E.2d 921 . … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ruled that segregation was discriminatory but it did not require a federal judge to become a substitute for local school boards.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Celanese

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 25, 2000

    Rutledge v. Tultex Corp. , 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). Dr. Senter, Dr. Rice and Dr. … While a circumstantial or chronological association between plaintiffs symptoms and workplace exposure may prove causation, as noted by the Court in Keel v. H V, Inc. , 107 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Constant Gray

    51 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

    The class of cases, Mellish v. Matteux, Peake N. P. 115; Baglehole v. Watters, 3rd Camp. Rep. 154; Pinckering v. Dawson, 4th *106 Taunt. 779, &c., where the property was sold “ with all faults,” is not in' point. … Nor the class of cases, Laidlaw v. Organ, 2 Wheat, 178; Bench v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Harding

    171 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 31, 1916

    Brown, admr. of Richard Short, v. J. J. … *Page 765 BROWN, J., did not sit in this case. Cited: Watters v. Hedgpeth , 172 N.C. 312 (9c); Chandler v. Jones , 172 N.C. 572 (10c); Marler v. Golden , 172 N.C. 825 (6c); Kirkwood v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shearin v. Brown

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2021

    SHEARIN V. … SHEARIN V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Ice Co.

    203 N.C. 97 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932

    Brown died 21 May, 1931. He had been working for the Asheville Ice Company for about twelve months prior to his death and was engaged in driving a delivery truck for delivering ice. … Brown is unknown, and that he did not suffer an injury by accident while employed by the Asheville Ice Company, causing his death, and it appearing that these findings are all negative and are dependent upon and include the

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Beaver

    48 N.C. 516 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1856

    In tbe case of Harrison v. Burgess, 1 Hawks’ Rep. 384, a script was offered for probate as the holograph will of one Irvine. The caveators objected, because it was attested by one subscribing witness.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Langley

    348 F. Supp. 2d 533 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 30, 2004

    Harris v. Hutchinson, 209 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir.2000); see also Spencer v. Sutton, 239 F.3d 626 (4th Cir. *536 2001). … See Minter v. Beck, 230 F.3d 663 (4th Cir.2000) (federal habeas claim was time-barred when more than one year had elapsed from date of conviction until the petitioner filed his § 2254 petition).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Steele v. Brown

    993 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 1998

    See Nunnally v. MacCausland, 996 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1993); Llewellyn v. Celanese Corp., 693 F.Supp. 369 (W.D.N.C.1988); and Moody v. Bayliner Marine Corp., 664 F.Supp. 232 (E.D.N.C.1987). … Compare Miller v. Runyon, 77 F.3d 189, 191-92 (7th Cir.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Lancaster

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2022

    STATE V. … See State v. Toney, 187 N.C. App. 465, 472, 653 S.E.2d 187, 191 (2007) (relying on State v. Brown, 350 N.C. 193, 213, 513 S.E.2d 57, 70 (1999)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown & Co. v. Nimocks

    124 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1899

    Bank v. Gilmer, 116 N. C., 684 ; S. C. , 117 N. C., 416, 426 ; Frank v. Heiner, Ibid, 79, 83; Glanton v. Jacobs, Ibid, 427; Cooper v. McKinnon, 122 N. C., 447, 449 . … The principle is so clearly stated by Chief Justice Pearson in Brannock v. Brannock, 32 N. C., 428 , that our own views can best be given by a full citation.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Diener v. Brown

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2023

    DIENER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BROWN, Defendant. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 5 July 2022 by Judge Karen D. McCallum in Mecklenburg County District Court. … BROWN Opinion of the Court judgment.” Ward v. Ward, 252 N.C. App. 253, 256, 797 S.E.2d 525, 528 (2017) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    285 N.C. 87 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.