Case law

Brown v. State

867 S.W.2d 239 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1993

Movant Gary Leon Brown appeals from a denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion, seeking to vacate a judgment and sentence on a plea of guilty to murder in the second degree. … Wedlow v. State, 841 S.W.2d at 217[11]; White v. State, 781 S.W.2d 167, 168-169 [4] (Mo.App.1989); Pines v. State, 778 S.W.2d 724, 726 [2] (Mo.App.1989); Robinson v.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

34 S.W.3d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2000

Cox v. Director of Revenue, 974 S.W.2d 633 (Mo.App.1998), Pointer v. Director of Revenue, 891 S.W.2d 876 (Mo.App.1995), and Stallmann v. … In Jackson v.

Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

720 S.W.2d 357 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1986

Farmer v. … He had his remedy before the Adjustment Board for wrongful discharge, and was ordered reinstated. The balance of his claim was of a nature which was quite appropriate for tort action. Pikop v.

Brown v. Toedebusch Transfer, Inc.

354 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 5, 1945

In Nelson v. Evans, 338 Mo. 991 , 93 S. … See also Alexander v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 327 Mo. 1012 , 38 S. W. (2d) 1023 ; and Woods v. Moore (Mo. Sup.), 48 S. W. (2d) 202 . The cases of Hornbuckle v. McCarty, 295 Mo. 162 , 243 S. W. 327; Schulz v.

United States v. Brown

376 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 13, 1974

The defendant Nathaniel Brown is charged in an information with attempting to board a commercial aircraft being operated by an air carrier in air transportation while having on or about his person a “concealed deadly or dangerous … On August 3, 1972, shortly before 5:00 p. m., defendant Nathaniel Brown presented himself at Gate 7-8 for the purpose of boarding Trans World Airlines Flight 270 for a flight from Kansas City, Missouri, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Brown v. Copeland

780 S.W.2d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1989

Tyler v. “Ron”Deputy Sheriff, 574 F.2d 427, 429 [3] (8th Cir.1978). … Sheley v. Dugger, 833 F.2d 1420, 1428 (11th Cir.1987); Green v. Ferrell, 801 F.2d 765, 772 [5] (5th Cir.1986).

Brown Bros. v. Gilliam

53 Mo. App. 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1893

Brown v. Crawford County

8 Mo. 640 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1844

Brown v. State

778 S.W.2d 336 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1989

Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989). Movant’s motion was not filed when mailed, but when lodged in the office of the circuit clerk. See State v. Johnson, 522 S.W.2d 106, 110 [4] (Mo.App.1975).

Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co.

116 Mo. App. 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1905

[Poindexter v. Paper Co., 84 Mo. App. 352 ; Mau v. Morse, 3 Colo. App. 359 ; Taylor v. Mfg. Co., 143 Mass. 470 ; Patterson v. Hemingway, 148 Mass. 94 ; Knox v. Car Co., 69 Hun 231 ; Diebold v. … Co. v. Rees, 21 Colo. 435 ; Siddall v. Jansen, 168 Ill. 43 ; Fisher v. Cook, 23 Ill. App. 621 ; Hopkinson v. Knapp Spalding Co., 92 Iowa 328 ; Frolich v. Kranker, 21 Ohio Ct. Rep. 615; Southern Loan Assn. v.

State v. Brown

768 S.W.2d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1989

The defendant cites Terry v. … Brown’s right to be free from double jeopardy. See Oregon v. Kennedy, supra, (no intent found when prosecutor asked a witness if the defendant was a “crook”); State v.

Brown v. State

793 S.W.2d 204 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1990

Movant, Richard Duane Brown, appeals from the denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 1 motion. Movant filed the Rule 29.15 motion pro se on September 20, 1988. … State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140 (Mo. banc 1986); on remand, State v. Brown, 716 S.W.2d 436 (Mo.App.1986). The record clearly shows sentence was pronounced before January 1, 1988.

Brown v. National Supermarkets, Inc.

679 S.W.2d 307 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1984

In Nappier v. … Laclede Investment Corp. v. Kaiser, 596 S.W.2d 36, 41 (Mo.App.1980). Privity of contract is no longer always necessary to maintain a suit for breach of contract. See Westerhold v.

Brown v. State

629 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

The latest ruling is in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981). 3 This court must follow the supreme court’s ruling. The judgment is affirmed. CRIST, P. J., and REINHARD, J., concur. . … State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981) confirms the earlier rulings in Sours I and II. Sours v.

Missouri Hospital Association v. Price

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 9, 2018

Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass’n, 135 S. Ct. 1199, 1203 (2015) (Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-303 (1979)). However, “[n]ot all rules must be issued through the notice-and-comment process. … V. THE MHA IS ENTITLED TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V RELATIVE TO THE FINAL RULE.

Brown v. State

783 S.W.2d 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1989

Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). … Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 [3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm.

Brown v. State

680 S.W.2d 174 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1984

The facts as contained in Brown’s guilty plea hearing are similar to and are more fully set out in Green v. State, 659 S.W.2d 219 (Mo.App. banc 1983). … As noted earlier, the facts as developed in the guilty plea hearing of Brown, *178 are the same as those developed in the case of his co-actor, Green v. State, supra, at 221. In Green v.

State v. Brown

516 S.W.2d 783 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1974

State v. Neal, 514 S.W.2d 544 (1974). … See also State v. Kennedy, 513 S.W.2d 697 [8] (Mo.App.1974). The Neal decision controls the issue raised here. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. DOWD, C. J., and WEIER and REND-LEN, JJ., concur.

Reed v. Brown

706 S.W.2d 866 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1986

Louis County Board of Election Commissioners certified that the election resulted in a tie, with each candidate receiving 48 votes. … International Business Machines Corp. v. State Tax Comm’n, 362 S.W.2d 635, 640 (Mo.1962); Moore v. Morehead, 666 S.W.2d 460 (Mo.App.1984). However, in Edwards v. St.

Brown v. Douglas Candy Company

277 S.W.2d 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1955

Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 335 Mo. 572 , 73 S.W.2d 264 , 94 A.L.R. 751 ; Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc., 224 Mo, App. 304, 25 S.W.2d 529 ; McFall v. … In Newman v.