Case law

Steffan v. Cheney

733 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1989

Major Funk instructed plaintiff to make this request to *117 the Academic Board. On April 1 the Academic Board convened to consider plaintiffs case. … See Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d at 466 n. 5; Simpson v.

National Voter Contact, Inc. v. Versace

511 A.2d 393 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

Board of Education, 34 Misc.2d 8, 9 , 228 N.Y.S.2d 62, 65 (1962) (letter calling court’s attention to its failure to consider certain relief is considered as an application for reargument). In Carr v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C.1978), this court considered a letter from counsel as "nothing more than” a request for an explanation of the court's order of dismissal. Id. at 81 .

Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Heckler

561 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 1983

. §§ 1395f(b); 1395x(b), (e); 1395x(v)(l)(A). … (the Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a).

In Re Lindmark

747 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

In re Manville, 538 A.2d 1128, 1132 (D.C.1988) (en banc) (Manville II) (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 246 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957)). … Board.” 2 .

Quantum Entertainment Limited v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Rich v. United States

369 F. Supp. 3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2019

Hensley v. United States , 292 F.Supp.3d 399 , 402 (D.D.C. 2018) (quoting Austin v. United States , 614 F. App'x 198 , 200 (5th Cir. 2015) ). … In Fail v. United States , the U.S.

Ficken v. Rice

594 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2009

See Crane v. N.Y. Zoological Soc’y, 894 F.2d 454, 456 (D.C.Cir.1990); First Chi. Int’l v. United Exch. … See Chrysler Corp. v.

District of Columbia v. McFall

188 F.2d 991 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1951

Code, § 47-2403 (1940). 4 . 3 Cooley, Taxation § 1282 (4th ed. 1924), and cases there collected; Wright v. Blakeslee, 1880, 101 U.S. 174 , 25 L.Ed. 1048 ; Fox v. … Edwards, 2 Cir., 1923, 287 P. 669 , 34 A.L.R. 973 ; Winant v. Gardner, 2 Cir., 1928, 29 F.2d 836 . 5 . 3 Cooley, op. eit. supra note 4, § 1297; Chesebrough v.

Vreven v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). 4  III. … Novelli made these statements to the Board of Directors, “it is hard to see how [plaintiff] could satisfy the requirement of providing . . . ‘fair notice’” to defendant. Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Kingman Park Civic Assoc. v. Muriel Bowser

815 F.3d 36 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2016

It has successfully applied to the District’s Historic Preservation Review Board to have the former Spingarn Senior High School designated a historic landmark. … But the Supreme Court held in Washington v.

Calhoun v. Prouty

643 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2009

E.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .

Paralyzed Veterans of America, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. D.C. Arena L.P., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, Appellants/cross-Appellees

117 F.3d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 1997

Shalala v. … Compare Kelley v.

Oliver v. Decatur

18 F. Cas. 656 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1834

Ca. 258; Brown v. Barkham, 1 P. W. 652; Thornhill v. Evans, 1 Atk. 330; Morgan v. Mather, 2 Ves. Jr. 15; Waring v. Cunliffe, 1 Id. 99.) Verdict for plaintiff, $7,558.

FW Berens Sales Co., Inc. v. McKinney

310 A.2d 601 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1973

Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951); Where a school board failed to admit the plaintiffs as pupils solely because they were unwed mothers after a court had already held in another case in which the very same school board … See Shull v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District, supra, 338 F.Supp. at 1378 (“[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith.

Paul D. Molineaux v. United States of America

12 F.3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 1994

Indeed, before the Board, the Department unsuccessfully argued that section 601 provides “no law to apply,” see Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. … Inc. v.

Baptiste v. Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … v.

Brooks v. Goodwill of Greater Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2015

See, e.g., Davis v. Vilsack, 880 F. … Date: March 25, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement And Power District v. United States

762 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1985

Because the Review Board "entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem," Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. … Ass'n v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

In Railway Clerks v. … The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy.

International Union, United Mine Workers v. Kleppe

532 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1976

Freeman Coal Mining Co. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 504 F.2d 741, 744 (7th Cir. 1974); Phillips v. … Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 104 , 500 F.2d 772, 782 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 938 , 95 S.Ct. 1149 , 43 L.Ed.2d 415 (1975); Reliable Coal Corp. v.