Case law

National Voter Contact, Inc. v. Versace

511 A.2d 393 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

Board of Education, 34 Misc.2d 8, 9 , 228 N.Y.S.2d 62, 65 (1962) (letter calling court’s attention to its failure to consider certain relief is considered as an application for reargument). In Carr v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C.1978), this court considered a letter from counsel as "nothing more than” a request for an explanation of the court's order of dismissal. Id. at 81 .

Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Heckler

561 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 1983

. §§ 1395f(b); 1395x(b), (e); 1395x(v)(l)(A). … (the Board). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a).

In Re Lindmark

747 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

In re Manville, 538 A.2d 1128, 1132 (D.C.1988) (en banc) (Manville II) (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 246 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957)). … Board.” 2 .

Raymond C. Rieser, Administrator for the Estate and Personal Representative of Rebecca A. Rieser v. District of Columbia, and Timothy Abron. Raymond C. Rieser, Administrator for the Estate and Personal Representative of Rebecca A. Rieser v. District of Columbia

563 F.2d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 1977

Brown, Parole Supervisor." R. 49, Pltfs. Exhibit 14, J. App. 602-03 17 Tr. 318; R. 55 18 Tr. 318 19 Tr. 426-29, 434-36, 463-64; R. 49, Pltfs. … In Brown v. District of Columbia, 304 A.2d 292 (D.C.App.1973) (per curiam) a police report was held not to constitute adequate notice of a false arrest claim.

Plesha v. Bestline International Research, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2021

Polster offered to ask the Board to issue plaintiff $78,875 of company stock, amounting to a 0.5% interest in defendant, id., but plaintiff rejected this offer, see Pl.’s Decl. ¶ 15, ECF No. 27-2. … Pl.’s Mot. at 12–13 (quoting Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39 (D.C.

Jamison Dupuy v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 2015

Cir. 1986) (reversing as-yet unenforced Board orders); Jackman v. … Workers v.

Wilson v. McDonough

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2025

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam). The Court will consider all of the pro se party’s filings in reviewing a motion to dismiss. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). The statute “precludes actions against federal officials for alleged constitutional violations as well as actions under other federal legislation.” Kizas v.

Vreven v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). 4  III. … Novelli made these statements to the Board of Directors, “it is hard to see how [plaintiff] could satisfy the requirement of providing . . . ‘fair notice’” to defendant. Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Dillon v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

912 A.2d 556 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2006

Ctr. v. … See Clark v.

FW Berens Sales Co., Inc. v. McKinney

310 A.2d 601 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1973

Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951); Where a school board failed to admit the plaintiffs as pupils solely because they were unwed mothers after a court had already held in another case in which the very same school board … See Shull v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District, supra, 338 F.Supp. at 1378 (“[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith.

NOVAMEDIX DISTRIBUTION LTD. v. Dickinson

175 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2001

See Ruiz v. A.B. … Arkie Lures, Inc. v. Gene Larew Tackle, Inc., 119 F.3d 953, 957 (Fed.Cir.1997). The PTO’s attempt to undermine the Board’s conclusion that the ’938-A reference teaches away from the ’101 patent is not successful.

Levering v. Bank of Columbia

15 F. Cas. 412 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1803

under the first agreement; but if the prosecution of the voyage was abandoned, and after the revocation of the first orders, he remained on board to take care of the ship in port, a voyage not being contemplated at the time … Levering v. Bank of Columbia [Case No. 8,287].

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

In Railway Clerks v. … The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy.

Sargent v. Paine Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

687 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 1988

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1725-26 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citations omitted). … The original opinion was ambiguous, and indeed the clarified opinion belied the Board’s confident interpretation of the original.” Id. at 354 (citations omitted)).

International Union, United Mine Workers v. Kleppe

532 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1976

Freeman Coal Mining Co. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 504 F.2d 741, 744 (7th Cir. 1974); Phillips v. … Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 104 , 500 F.2d 772, 782 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 938 , 95 S.Ct. 1149 , 43 L.Ed.2d 415 (1975); Reliable Coal Corp. v.

Colm v. Kissinger

406 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 1975

Plaintiffs cite for this proposition Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. … See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 182 F.2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 669 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 (1951). 23 . See Board of Regents v.

A & J Cartage, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

44 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1994

A & J CARTAGE, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 93-1271. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Dec. 2, 1994. … JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. 1 This cause came to be heard on petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of the decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"), and was briefed and argued by counsel

Blackwell v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

646 F.3d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2011

Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1193 (D.C.Cir.2009). … See Mayer Brown LLP, 562 F.3d at 1194 .

Rich v. United States

369 F. Supp. 3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2019

Hensley v. United States , 292 F.Supp.3d 399 , 402 (D.D.C. 2018) (quoting Austin v. United States , 614 F. App'x 198 , 200 (5th Cir. 2015) ). … In Fail v. United States , the U.S.

Jenkins v. Holder

949 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2013

Tate, 131 F.R.D. at 364 (quoting Brown v. Dist. Unemp’t Comp. Bd., 411 F. Supp. 1001, 1001-1002 (D.D.C. 1975)). … Tate, 131 F.R.D. at 364 (quoting Brown v. Dist. Unemp’t Comp. Bd., 411 F. Supp. 1001, 1001-1002 (D.D.C. 1975)). 6