Case law

Quantum Entertainment Limited v. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C. Cir. 1995). … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

In Re Lindmark

747 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

In re Manville, 538 A.2d 1128, 1132 (D.C.1988) (en banc) (Manville II) (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 246 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957)). … Board.” 2 .

Plesha v. Bestline International Research, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2021

Polster offered to ask the Board to issue plaintiff $78,875 of company stock, amounting to a 0.5% interest in defendant, id., but plaintiff rejected this offer, see Pl.’s Decl. ¶ 15, ECF No. 27-2. … Pl.’s Mot. at 12–13 (quoting Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39 (D.C.

Jamison Dupuy v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 2015

Cir. 1986) (reversing as-yet unenforced Board orders); Jackman v. … Workers v.

Vreven v. Aarp

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). 4  III. … Novelli made these statements to the Board of Directors, “it is hard to see how [plaintiff] could satisfy the requirement of providing . . . ‘fair notice’” to defendant. Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Kingman Park Civic Assoc. v. Muriel Bowser

815 F.3d 36 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2016

It has successfully applied to the District’s Historic Preservation Review Board to have the former Spingarn Senior High School designated a historic landmark. … But the Supreme Court held in Washington v.

Calhoun v. Prouty

643 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2009

E.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 458 .

Oliver v. Decatur

18 F. Cas. 656 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1834

Ca. 258; Brown v. Barkham, 1 P. W. 652; Thornhill v. Evans, 1 Atk. 330; Morgan v. Mather, 2 Ves. Jr. 15; Waring v. Cunliffe, 1 Id. 99.) Verdict for plaintiff, $7,558.

FW Berens Sales Co., Inc. v. McKinney

310 A.2d 601 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1973

Co., 186 F.2d 473, 481 (4th Cir. 1951); Where a school board failed to admit the plaintiffs as pupils solely because they were unwed mothers after a court had already held in another case in which the very same school board … See Shull v. Columbia Municipal Separate School District, supra, 338 F.Supp. at 1378 (“[T]he [school] board acted directly contrary to Judge Keady’s holding in Smith.

Paul D. Molineaux v. United States of America

12 F.3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 1994

Indeed, before the Board, the Department unsuccessfully argued that section 601 provides “no law to apply,” see Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. … Inc. v.

Baptiste v. Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … v.

Brooks v. Goodwill of Greater Washington

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2015

See, e.g., Davis v. Vilsack, 880 F. … Date: March 25, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement And Power District v. United States

762 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1985

Because the Review Board "entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem," Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. … Ass'n v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

In Railway Clerks v. … The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy.

Sargent v. Paine Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

687 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 1988

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1725-26 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citations omitted). … The original opinion was ambiguous, and indeed the clarified opinion belied the Board’s confident interpretation of the original.” Id. at 354 (citations omitted)).

International Union, United Mine Workers v. Kleppe

532 F.2d 1403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1976

Freeman Coal Mining Co. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 504 F.2d 741, 744 (7th Cir. 1974); Phillips v. … Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 104 , 500 F.2d 772, 782 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 938 , 95 S.Ct. 1149 , 43 L.Ed.2d 415 (1975); Reliable Coal Corp. v.

Coster v. Schwat

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2025

Programming Found., Inc. v. … “To establish that a board was interested or lacked independence, a plaintiff must allege facts as to the interest and lack of independence of the individual members of that board.” Orman v.

Colm v. Kissinger

406 F. Supp. 1250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 17, 1975

Plaintiffs cite for this proposition Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Wieman v. … See Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 182 F.2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U.S. 918 , 71 S.Ct. 669 , 95 L.Ed. 1352 (1951). 23 . See Board of Regents v.

United States v. Gonzalez

688 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1988

United States v. … The United States Supreme Court has held that § 3072 entitles officers of the Customs to board and search American vessels in international waters. Maul v.

A & J Cartage, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

44 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1994

A & J CARTAGE, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 93-1271. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Dec. 2, 1994. … JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. 1 This cause came to be heard on petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of the decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB"), and was briefed and argued by counsel