Case law

Hodgson v. Turner

12 F. Cas. 286 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802

THE COURT, on the authority of Brown v. Barry and Clarke v. Russel [supra], refused to give the instruction as prayed. Mr.

In Re Bullock

103 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 1952

In United States v. … Ludolph v. Board of Police Commissioners, 30 Cal.App.2d 211 , 86 P.2d 118, 121 ; Application of Scro, 200 Misc. 688 , 108 N.Y.S.2d 305, 307 .

U-Ahk-Vroman-Sanchez v. United States Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2021

Stewart v. Sackley, 251 F. Supp. 3d 138, 156 (D.D.C. 2017) (cleaned up); see also Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. … V.

Holston v. Vance-Cooks

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2013

See Allen v. … Date: November 5, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Bosken v. United States

796 F. Supp. 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1992

This Court must affirm the Board’s decision that Plaintiff’s claim is without merit. In reviewing a decision of the Foreign Service Grievance Board this Court must afford great deference to Board’s decision. See U.S. v. … See id. at 513-514 ; F.T.C. v. Indiana Federation of Dentists, 476 U.S. 447, 454 , 106 S.Ct. 2009, 2015-2016 , 90 L.Ed.2d 445 (1986).

Elchibegoff v. Dulles

123 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 1954

Arant v. Lane, 1919, 249 U.S. 367, 372 , 39 S.Ct. 293, 294 , 63 L.Ed. 650, 652 ; Grasse v. … As is indicated in Grasse v. Snyder, supra, his administrative remedies were exhausted and the doors of this Court open to plaintiff in February, 1948, when his appeal was denied by the Board of Appeals and Review.

Adams v. Clinton

90 F. Supp. 2d 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2000

Shook v. … In Adams v.

In Re Johnson

984 A.2d 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2009

PER CURIAM: Seven years ago, Bar Counsel received and reviewed the findings of the United States District Court in Gov’t of Rwanda v. Rwanda Working Group, 227 F.Supp.2d 45 (D.D.C.2002). … Bar Counsel, however, had begun its investigation, and on January 22, 2009, the parties filed a Petition for Negotiated Dis *179 cipline and supporting Affidavit with the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) in

Local 374, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. The American Ship Building Company

331 F.2d 839 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 1964

International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 110 U.S. … See Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Price v. Barry

53 F.3d 369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1995

The mandatory language sufficiently restricted the Board’s parole decisions so as to give rise to a protecti-ble liberty interest in parole release. In Board of Pardons v. … The use of the word “may” clearly marks the Board’s decision as discretionary. See United States v. Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677, 706 , 103 S.Ct. 2132, 2149 , 76 L.Ed.2d 236 (1983).

Davis v. Moore

772 A.2d 204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2001

Board of Parole. … Board rather than Commission).

Truitt v. Barrett

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2021

Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 89-90 10 (D.D.C. 2006). … (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 (1973)).

Simpson Bros., Inc. v. District of Columbia

179 F.2d 430 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1950

We held in Thomas v. … The Note cites Thomas v.

Thomas v. District of Columbia Government

580 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2008

Sparrow v. … See Moody v.

Richard Figueroa v. Michael Pompeo

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 2019

The first board reviews all employees across a salary level – all FS-02 officers, for instance. The second board then reviews the candidates whom the Secretary did not promote from the first board’s recommendations. … See, e.g., Browning v. Dep’t of the Army, 436 F.3d 692, 697 (6th Cir. 2006) (“[E]mployers may use matrices that reward applicants who meet subjective criteria.”).

Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n

484 F. Supp. 1195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1980

See also National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 , 98 S.Ct. 1355 , 55 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, supra, 404 U.S. at 513 , 92 S.Ct. at 613 ; Israel v.

Cole v. Fulwood

879 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2012

Parole Commission (“USPC”) assumed the responsibilities of the District of Columbia Board of Parole (“the Board”). See Taylor v. Reilly, No. 10-5153, 2012 WL 2892392 at *1 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … See Sellmon v. Reilly, 561 F. Supp. 2d 46, 51-52 (D.D.C. 2008). For the reasons set forth in those opinions, it again rejects the argument that the Board had unlimited discretion. B.

Mark Avrech v. The Secretary of the Navy

477 F.2d 1237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1973

Likewise, we follow the view of the United States Air Force Board of Review in United States v. McLeod, 18 CMR 814 (1954) and the Coast Guard Board of Review in United States v. Barker, 26 CMR 838 (1958). … Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 at 111 , 70 S.Ct. 495 at 498 , 94 L.Ed. 691 (1950). However, in the same year, in a unanimous opinion by Mr.

Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of Interior

312 F. Supp. 3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2018

Brown v. FBI , 873 F.Supp.2d 388 , 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Wasserman v. Rodacker , No. 06-cv-1005 (RWR), 2007 WL 2071649 , at *7 (D.D.C. July 18, 2007) ). … Jones , 177 F.Supp.3d at 548 (quoting Brodie v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. , 715 F.Supp.2d 74 , 84 (D.D.C. 2010) ); see Brown v.

Monmouth Medical Center v. Thompson

257 F.3d 807 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2001

. v. … s 1395x(v)(1)(A)(ii)).