Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.83s

  • Nani v. Brownell

    153 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 1957

    Bannout v. Brownell, D.C.D.C., 129 F.Supp. 488 can be distinguished. … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 , upon which the Court relied, also can be distinguished.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alexander T. Deutsch v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America

    401 F.2d 404 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1968

    Under 10 C.F.R. § 80.61 (e) (1968) the decision of the Board became the final action of the Commission. 5 . Consolo v. FMC, 383 U.S. 607 , 86 S.Ct. 1018 , 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); FCC v. … Rankin, 295 U.S. 123 , 55 S.Ct. 732 , 79 L.Ed. 1343 (1935); Palmer v. CIR, 302 U.S. 63 , 58 S.Ct. 67 , 82 L.Ed. 50 (1937); NLRB v. Waterman S. S.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Roderick v. District of Columbia

    10 D.C. 589 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

    In Barnes v. … This appears to be the doctrine of the Supreme Court in the case of Barnes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Mallick

    514 F.3d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

    Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … Although a valid assignment of a chose in action requires no notice to the obligor, Hutchinson v. Brown, 8 App. D.C. 157 (D.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • R.P. v. District of Columbia

    474 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2007

    Baker , in turn, relies on the Supreme Court’s decision in Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … See Starbuck v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Srour v. Barnes

    670 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1987

    The notion of allowing punitive damages in a contract milieu was born in this jurisdiction in the case of Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39-40 (D.C.Cir.1958). … Notwithstanding the salutary rule which Brown espouses, cases following it have sought to narrow its impact. In Den v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Lacson v. United States Department of Homeland Security

    726 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 2013

    Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. … We repeated this approach in Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 589 F.3d 445 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Sara Aviel v. Sergio Gor

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 2025

    That means the Board—not the President—has the power to remove Aviel. See Free Enter. Fund v. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477, 493, 509 (2010). … Raines v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Moore

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2019

    Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576, 583 (1984). … In United States v. Basciano, 369 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees and Helpers, Local Union No. 695, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Madision Employers' Council

    361 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1966

    NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MADISION EMPLOYERS' COUNCIL et al., Respondents. Nos. 19386, 19429. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. … Council of Carpenters, etc. v. NLRB, 332 F.2d 636 , 640 (3rd. Cir. 1964); NLRB v. Denver Bldg. & Const.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Healey v. Barker Foundation

    469 A.2d 1244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1983

    On May 7, 1982, appellant filed a one count complaint alleging that the Board had acted ultra vires in removing her and seeking a declaration that she was still a Board member (Count I). … See Medina v. Rudman, 545 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir.1976); O'Brien v. DiGrazia, 544 F.2d 543, 545 (1st Cir.1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Truitt v. Barrett

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2021

    Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 89-90 10 (D.D.C. 2006). … (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 (1973)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Gates

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2011

    v. … In Ricks, the plaintiff was a college professor who had been denied tenure by a vote of the college’s board of trustees. Id. at 252.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Calvin Morgan Bissette, and Frances T. Bissette, for Themselves and for All Others Similarly Situated v. Colonial Mortgage Corporation of D. C.

    477 F.2d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1973

    Indeed, the Federal Reserve Board now apparently shares that view. … See Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 464 F.2d 838 (1972). 4 .

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Department of Medical Assistant Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. HHS

    967 F.3d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2020

    Virginia sought judicial review of the Board’s decision in the district court. Va. Dep’t of Med. Assistance Servs. v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services, 2018 WL 4705792 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2018). … See Friedman v. Sebelius, 686 F.3d 813, 818 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (HHS’s Departmental Appeals Board findings supported by substantial evidence “shall be conclusive.”).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rogers Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

    275 F.3d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2002

    Fund, Inc. v. EPA, 636 F.2d 1267, 1271 (D.C. Cir. 1980). … The Board has construed an accelerated decision to be in the nature of summary judgment, and has adopted the formulation of the Supreme Court in Anderson v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Bruce v. McBride v. Eastman Kodak Company, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

    844 F.2d 797 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1988

    Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau, 738 F.2d 474, 479 (D.C.Cir.1984). … American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Jones, 426 F.2d 1263, 1265 (D.C.Cir.1970) (footnote omitted). See also Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. Director, OWCP, 592 F.2d 762, 765 (4th Cir.1979).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hobson v. Hansen

    252 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 1966

    Plaintiffs also rely on O’Donoghue v. … See, e. g., Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346, 361 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1911); United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hall, Dennis

    324 F.3d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 2003

    P. 33 advisory committee’s note. 6 see also United States v. Kladouris, 739 F. Supp. 1221, 1225– 27 (N.D. Ill. 1990) (citing United States v. Brown, 476 F.2d 933, 935 n.11 (D.C. … P. 33(b)(1), we have since clarified that the Brown language specifically relied on was dictum.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Leslie Randolph v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission and Hoffman-Struever Waterfront, LLC

    83 A.3d 756 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2014

    Glasgow, Jr., and Mary Carolyn Brown were on the brief, for intervenor. … Hill v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 717 A.2d 909, 912 (D.C. 1998). Moreover, “[i]t is the longstanding policy of this court not to consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.” Gathy v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.