Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.83s
153 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 1957
Bannout v. Brownell, D.C.D.C., 129 F.Supp. 488 can be distinguished. … Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468 , 56 S.Ct. 906 , 80 L.Ed. 1288 , upon which the Court relied, also can be distinguished.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAlexander T. Deutsch v. United States Atomic Energy Commission and United States of America
401 F.2d 404 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1968
Under 10 C.F.R. § 80.61 (e) (1968) the decision of the Board became the final action of the Commission. 5 . Consolo v. FMC, 383 U.S. 607 , 86 S.Ct. 1018 , 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); FCC v. … Rankin, 295 U.S. 123 , 55 S.Ct. 732 , 79 L.Ed. 1343 (1935); Palmer v. CIR, 302 U.S. 63 , 58 S.Ct. 67 , 82 L.Ed. 50 (1937); NLRB v. Waterman S. S.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRoderick v. District of Columbia
10 D.C. 589 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881
In Barnes v. … This appears to be the doctrine of the Supreme Court in the case of Barnes v.
Cited 0 timesPublished514 F.3d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … Although a valid assignment of a chose in action requires no notice to the obligor, Hutchinson v. Brown, 8 App. D.C. 157 (D.C.
Cited 10 timesPublished474 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2007
Baker , in turn, relies on the Supreme Court’s decision in Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … See Starbuck v.
Cited 10 timesPublished670 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1987
The notion of allowing punitive damages in a contract milieu was born in this jurisdiction in the case of Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39-40 (D.C.Cir.1958). … Notwithstanding the salutary rule which Brown espouses, cases following it have sought to narrow its impact. In Den v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedLacson v. United States Department of Homeland Security
726 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 2013
Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. … We repeated this approach in Nyunt v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 589 F.3d 445 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Cited 61 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 2025
That means the Board—not the President—has the power to remove Aviel. See Free Enter. Fund v. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477, 493, 509 (2010). … Raines v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2019
Block v. Rutherford, 468 U.S. 576, 583 (1984). … In United States v. Basciano, 369 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished361 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1966
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MADISION EMPLOYERS' COUNCIL et al., Respondents. Nos. 19386, 19429. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. … Council of Carpenters, etc. v. NLRB, 332 F.2d 636 , 640 (3rd. Cir. 1964); NLRB v. Denver Bldg. & Const.
Cited 1 timesPublished469 A.2d 1244 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1983
On May 7, 1982, appellant filed a one count complaint alleging that the Board had acted ultra vires in removing her and seeking a declaration that she was still a Board member (Count I). … See Medina v. Rudman, 545 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir.1976); O'Brien v. DiGrazia, 544 F.2d 543, 545 (1st Cir.1976).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2021
Sierra Club v. Mainella, 459 F. Supp. 2d 76, 89-90 10 (D.D.C. 2006). … (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 (1973)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2011
v. … In Ricks, the plaintiff was a college professor who had been denied tenure by a vote of the college’s board of trustees. Id. at 252.
Cited 0 timesPublished477 F.2d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1973
Indeed, the Federal Reserve Board now apparently shares that view. … See Gardner & North Roofing & Siding Corp. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 464 F.2d 838 (1972). 4 .
Cited 36 timesPublishedDepartment of Medical Assistant Services of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. HHS
967 F.3d 853 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2020
Virginia sought judicial review of the Board’s decision in the district court. Va. Dep’t of Med. Assistance Servs. v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Services, 2018 WL 4705792 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2018). … See Friedman v. Sebelius, 686 F.3d 813, 818 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (HHS’s Departmental Appeals Board findings supported by substantial evidence “shall be conclusive.”).
Cited 1 timesPublishedRogers Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
275 F.3d 1096 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2002
Fund, Inc. v. EPA, 636 F.2d 1267, 1271 (D.C. Cir. 1980). … The Board has construed an accelerated decision to be in the nature of summary judgment, and has adopted the formulation of the Supreme Court in Anderson v.
Cited 24 timesPublished844 F.2d 797 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1988
Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau, 738 F.2d 474, 479 (D.C.Cir.1984). … American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Jones, 426 F.2d 1263, 1265 (D.C.Cir.1970) (footnote omitted). See also Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. Director, OWCP, 592 F.2d 762, 765 (4th Cir.1979).
Cited 13 timesPublished252 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 1966
Plaintiffs also rely on O’Donoghue v. … See, e. g., Muskrat v. United States, 219 U.S. 346, 361 , 31 S.Ct. 250 , 55 L.Ed. 246 (1911); United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished324 F.3d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 2003
P. 33 advisory committee’s note. 6 see also United States v. Kladouris, 739 F. Supp. 1221, 1225– 27 (N.D. Ill. 1990) (citing United States v. Brown, 476 F.2d 933, 935 n.11 (D.C. … P. 33(b)(1), we have since clarified that the Brown language specifically relied on was dictum.
Cited 16 timesPublishedLeslie Randolph v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission and Hoffman-Struever Waterfront, LLC
83 A.3d 756 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 2014
Glasgow, Jr., and Mary Carolyn Brown were on the brief, for intervenor. … Hill v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 717 A.2d 909, 912 (D.C. 1998). Moreover, “[i]t is the longstanding policy of this court not to consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.” Gathy v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna