Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1928

10,000+ results

1.14s

  • Estate of Alvarado ex rel. Alvarado v. Shavatt

    673 F. App'x 777 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 18, 2017

    Government officials are entitled to qualified immunity from suits for damages unless (1) a plaintiff alleges facts that make out a constitutional violation, and (2) the right at issue was clearly established at the time … Because we reverse on this ground, we do not address Shavatt’s arguments about whether the right at issue was clearly established.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Metro. Dade County v. Chase Fed. Housing

    705 So. 2d 674 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 28, 1998

    The legislature established a fund and procedures for carrying out the necessary remedial measures. … The language of the immunity sections, see supra notes 2 and 3, is also comprehensive as to the preclusion of administrative and judicial action against those who qualify.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Christman v. Kick

    342 F. Supp. 2d 82 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 28, 2004

    More specifically, a police officer is entitled to qualified immunity from liability for his discretionary actions if either (1) his “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … When considering a question of qualified immunity, however, a district court must determine whether, given the “specific context of the case,” the right was clearly established.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Engel v. Buchan

    778 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 4, 2011

    immunity test: whether a reasonable officer would have known that his actions were unconstitutional in light of clearly established law. … , because Engel has properly stated a claim for a violation of a constitutional right, and because that right was clearly established at the time of the asserted violation, Buchan is not entitled to qualified immunity against

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Conrad

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 20, 2022

    When qualified immunity is raised in a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff’s allegations must “plausibly mak[e] out a claim that the defendant's conduct violated a constitutional right that was clearly established law at … established prong of the qualified immunity defense.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bonnie Lee Hinchman v. Edwin L. Moore Jr. And Robert A. Dombrowski

    312 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 2, 2002

    Immunity The defendants maintain, as alternative defenses, that they are entitled to both absolute and qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary functions will not incur liability for civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Lanman v. Hinson

    529 F.3d 673 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 17, 2008

    affirmative defense of qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity shields public officials who perform discretionary functions from tort liability, so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established rights viewed under the applicable constitutional standard

    Cited 748 timesPublished
  • Jean v. Collins

    107 F.3d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 7, 1997

    Ill A government official is entitled to qualified immunity from civil liability under § 1983 when his or her “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would … B In deciding whether Shingleton and Collins are entitled to qualified immunity we must next determine whether the specific right infringed was clearly established in 1982. Pritchett v.

    Vacated by Jean v. Collins, 155 F.3d 701 (1998)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Werner v. Wall

    836 F.3d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 1, 2016

    Werner’s Eighth Amendment and due process claims for damages against the individual defendants were barred by qualified immunity because it was not clearly established at the time that AD 02-10 violated the constitutional … Because clearly established law at the time would not have notified the defendants in this case that the procedures set forth in AD 02-10 were unlawful, we conclude that they are entitled to qualified immunity on Mr.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • McDay Ex Rel. McDay v. City of Atlanta

    740 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, N.D. Georgia · Apr 4, 1990

    Qualified Immunity Officers Cartwright and Price move for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. … The qualified immunity defense first recognized by the Supreme Court in Pierson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Matt Moonin v. Kevin Tice

    868 F.3d 853 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 2017

    We must grant Tice qualified immunity unless Moonin can show that Tice “violated a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.” City of San Francisco v. … The City previously had required officers to obtain prior written 8 We emphasize that we are here considering only the clearly established law prong of qualified immunity, not whether requiring notice or approval

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • De Ventura v. Keith

    169 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 21, 2001

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, public officials, such as law enforcement officials, are not liable under federal law for civil damages to the extent that their conduct does not contravene “clearly established rights … Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 121 S.Ct. 2151 , 2156 (2001). 1 To obtain qualified immunity under Saucier, Defendant Keith must establish that in light of the clearly established law on probable cause for warrantless arrests, he reasonably

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McAllister v. Price

    615 F.3d 877 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 12, 2010

    No. 10-1213 7 The doctrine of qualified immunity protects govern- ment officials from liability for civil damages when their conduct does not violate clearly established … established Fourth Amendment rights and thus deprives the defendant of qualified immunity.

    Cited 110 timesPublished
  • Hofschneider v. City of Vancouver

    182 F. Supp. 3d 1145 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 21, 2016

    Schaffer also argues that his search and seizure of Hofschneider was conducted reasonably, and that, even if it was not, he is entitled to qualified immunity because any right he did violate was not “clearly established.” … the “right at issue was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the defendant’s alleged misconduct.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Toler v. Troutt

    631 F. App'x 545 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 12, 2015

    They filed this interlocutory appeal based on qualified immunity. … If such a general statement of the constitutional violation that must be clearly established were sufficient, qualified immunity would almost never be granted.

    Cited 15 timesUnpublished
  • Turturro ex rel. Turturro v. City of New York

    28 N.Y.3d 469 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2016

    In the specific proprietary field of roadway safety, a municipality is afforded “a qualified immunity from liability arising out of a highway planning decision” (Friedman, 67 NY2d at *480 283 ). 1 The qualified nature of … This qualified immunity, which applies in a specific field of proprietary functions, is separate from the governmental function immunity defense, which applies only to governmental functions, as explained.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Parks v. City of Warner Robins, Ga.

    841 F. Supp. 1205 · District Court, M.D. Georgia · Jan 14, 1994

    Qualified Immunity The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has adopted an objective-reasonableness test for determining whether a government official is entitled to qualified immunity. See Courson v. … Under this analysis, the defendant is entitled to qualified immunity if either (1) the law was not clearly established, or (2) the law was clearly established but the defendant did not violate the law. Id. n. 14. A.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wilkerson v. Stalder

    329 F.3d 431 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 14, 2003

    The court must engage in a two-step analysis to determine whether an official is entitled to qualified immunity. … First, the court must determine whether the plaintiff’s allegations make out a violation of a clearly established constitutional right.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Madison v. Cruz

    359 F. Supp. 3d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2019

    The First Circuit has adopted a two-part test to assess qualified immunity. … I find that had Defendant McDonald been aware that Plaintiff was outed as an informant and previously assaulted but declined to act to ensure Plaintiff's safety, it would qualify as a violation of Plaintiff's clearly established

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ronald Fosnight v. Robert Jones

    41 F.4th 916 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 27, 2022

    Qualified im- munity protects government officials from damages liability unless they “violate clearly established statutory or constitu- 3 We note for completeness that the Supreme Court has never authorized a Bivens action … The district court may entertain a qualified-immunity defense on a defendant’s motion to dismiss.

    Cited 120 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.