Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.37s
A Love of Food I, LLC v. Maoz Vegetarian USA, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2013
.”); see also Buruca v. Dist. of Columbia, 902 F. Supp. 2d 75, 79 n.1 (D.D.C. 2012); United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 133, 135-36 (D.D.C. 2012); Brooks v. Clinton, 841 F. … See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 285 F.R.D. at 136 (“If the party was not diligent, the inquiry should end.”) (quoting Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished526 A.2d 17 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1987
He left dormitory No. 4, where he resided, and went to dormitory No. 16 to speak to Alphonso Brown, another inmate who regularly did Haith’s laundry. … See, e.g., Thomas v. Barnett, 107 Ga.App. 717, 729-31 , 131 S.E.2d 818, 827 (1963); Gordon v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedKarcher v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2025
Brown, and Ryan A. … Brown, and Ryan A. Balmer. B.
Cited 0 timesPublished196 A.3d 414 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2018
.; accord, Leake v. United States, 77 A.3d 971, 975 (D.C. 2013). 11 Brown v. United States, 59 A.3d 967, 976 (D.C. 2013) (quoting Davis v. … The obligatory instruction quoted by Brown derives from Crowder, 383 A.2d at 342 n.11. 21 See Davis v. United States, 669 A.2d 680, 684 (D.C. 1995).
Cited 5 timesPublished277 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1971
Appellant was tall, had dark brown skin, long hair with “little side locks” and was wearing green pants and a brown topcoat. … See also United States v. Wilson, 435 F.2d 403 (D.C.Cir., 1970).
Cited 18 timesPublished486 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1980
See Brown v. Biglin, 454 F.Supp. 394, 399 (E.D.Pa.1978); Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, 425 F.Supp. 318, 324 (D.Mass.), affirmed, 545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976). … See Brown v. Ralston Purina Co., 557 F.2d 570 (6th Cir. 1977); Hochstadt v. Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, 545 F.2d 222 (1st Cir. 1976); Garrett v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedNational Association of Waterfront Employers v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009
the Benefits Review Board instituted its own rule requiring that decisions and orders issued by the Board use claimants’ initials. 4 See Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996, Pub. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 (1979).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2018
Grell’s complaint also vaguely sketches a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), seeking review of an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) determination. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1931
In these circumstances we are obliged to reach the same conclusion reached by the Board. See Burnet v. Houston, 51 S. Ct. 413 , 75 L. Ed.-, decided by the Supreme Court April 13, 1931. … In these circumstances, we think it our duty to affirm the decision of the Board.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. Paul K. Strother
578 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1978
In Dorman v. … In particular, he asserts that our earlier decisions in United States v. Brown, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 398 , 428 F.2d 1100 (1970), and United States v. Dorsey, 146 U.S.App.
Cited 45 timesPublishedCoumaris v. DIST. OF COL. ALCOHOLIC BEV. BD.
660 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995
Co. v. … As we stated in Dietrich v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhite v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2018
(citing Byrd v. District of Columbia, 1991 WL 336038, 119 U.S. LEXIS 12775 at *7 (D.D.C. Sept. 12, 1991); Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28, 31 n.4 (D.C. 1976)); see also Brown v. … Moreover, the Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColeman v. District of Columbia
279 F. 990 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1922
Taggart v. School District No. 1, 96 Or. 422, 430 , 188 Pac. 908, 1119 ; Birdsall v. Clark et al., 73 N. Y. 73 , 29 Am. Rep. 105 , and cases cited in note; Franklin Bridge Co. v. Young Wood, 14 Ga. 80 . … Stone v. Bank of Commerce, 174 U. S. 412, 424 , 19 Sup. Ct. 747, 752 ( 43 L. Ed. 1028 ). See, also, Montenegro-Riehm Music Co. v. Louisville, 147 Ky. 720 , 145 S. W. 740 ; School District v.
Cited 4 timesPublished987 A.2d 1180 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2010
On the driver’s-side floor board they found “a small quantity” of marijuana. … United States v. Brown, 708 A.2d 637, 639 (D.C.1998); see also 2 Wayne R.
Cited 20 timesPublished747 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000
In re Manville, 538 A.2d 1128, 1132 (D.C.1988) (en banc) (Manville II) (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 246 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957)). … Board.” 2 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2017
This is no easy task as much of the factual recitation is jumbled, and what actually happened on board the ship is not easily discerned. Plaintiff, who served in the U.S. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Rule 12(b)(6)’s pleading standard is “not meant to impose a great burden upon a plaintiff,” Dura Pharm., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSaline Parents v. Merrick Garland
88 F.4th 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 2023
See Trump v. New York, 141 S. … The Complaint recounts that school board members have complained about parents “attacking the board” by calling into question the board’s integrity and morals. Id. ¶ 89, J.A. 24.
Cited 11 timesPublished990 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1997
See, e.g., Chan v. … Tao v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks
402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968
In Railway Clerks v. … The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy.
Cited 5 timesPublished422 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1976
V, 1975). … A number of issues raised by the parties were put off pending the Supreme Court’s decisions in Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), and Chandler v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna