Case law

East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Intervenor. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, East Bay Union of MacHinists Local 1304, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenors

322 F.2d 411 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 27, 1963

v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 344 U.S. 344 , 73 S.Ct. 287 , 97 L.Ed. 377 (1953); Phelps-Dodge Corp. v.

Holston v. Vance-Cooks

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2013

See Allen v. … Date: November 5, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Steffan v. Cheney

733 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1989

Major Funk instructed plaintiff to make this request to *117 the Academic Board. On April 1 the Academic Board convened to consider plaintiffs case. … See Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d at 466 n. 5; Simpson v.

Reneau v. District of Columbia

676 A.2d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 30, 1996

Thompson, 451 A.2d 1177, 1193 (D.C.1982) (quoting Bakers Local Union No. 118 v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 437 A.2d 176 , 179 n. 6 (D.C.1981)). I. … Williamson v. Board of Dentistry, 647 A.2d 389, 394 (D.C.1994) (citing Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Bd., 377 A.2d 436, 439 (D.C.1977)).

Mason v. Rock Creek Plaza, Inc.

164 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1958

Hutchison v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 1953, 140 Conn. 381 , 100 A.2d 839 . Here the Zoning Commission was clear in its intent to enact a regulation that would include commercial adjuncts for The Woodner. … Unless the Board’s decision is clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, courts should not substitute their judgment for the Board’s. Selden v.

A Love of Food I, LLC v. Maoz Vegetarian USA, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2013

.”); see also Buruca v. Dist. of Columbia, 902 F. Supp. 2d 75, 79 n.1 (D.D.C. 2012); United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 285 F.R.D. 133, 135-36 (D.D.C. 2012); Brooks v. Clinton, 841 F. … See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 285 F.R.D. at 136 (“If the party was not diligent, the inquiry should end.”) (quoting Johnson v.

Haith v. District of Columbia

526 A.2d 17 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1987

He left dormitory No. 4, where he resided, and went to dormitory No. 16 to speak to Alphonso Brown, another inmate who regularly did Haith’s laundry. … See, e.g., Thomas v. Barnett, 107 Ga.App. 717, 729-31 , 131 S.E.2d 818, 827 (1963); Gordon v.

Karcher v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2025

Brown, and Ryan A. … Brown, and Ryan A. Balmer. B.

Ramey v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

950 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2008

District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 625 A.2d 886 (D.C.1993); Spartin v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 584 A.2d 564 (D.C.1990); and Dailey v. … On petitioner’s appeal to the Compensation Review Board (CRB or Board), that body likewise concluded that he had not invoked the presumption of compensability “by showing that a particular incident or situation at work was

U-Ahk-Vroman-Sanchez v. United States Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 2021

Stewart v. Sackley, 251 F. Supp. 3d 138, 156 (D.D.C. 2017) (cleaned up); see also Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. … V.

Victor Coley v. United States

196 A.3d 414 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2018

.; accord, Leake v. United States, 77 A.3d 971, 975 (D.C. 2013). 11 Brown v. United States, 59 A.3d 967, 976 (D.C. 2013) (quoting Davis v. … The obligatory instruction quoted by Brown derives from Crowder, 383 A.2d at 342 n.11. 21 See Davis v. United States, 669 A.2d 680, 684 (D.C. 1995).

A & G Ltd. Partnership v. Joint Committee on Landmarks of the National Capital

449 A.2d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 1982

Latimer v. Joint Committee on Landmarks of the National Capital, D.C.App., 345 A.2d 484, 485 (1975) (footnote omitted). … Under § 5-1003, the Joint Committee, as the body which functioned as the District of Columbia State Review Board at the time of the Act’s passage, is authorized to act as the local Historic Preservation Review Board until

In re Hermina

907 A.2d 790 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2006

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY This reciprocal discipline matter comes before the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) as a result of discipline imposed by the Court of … Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Hermina, Misc.

Grell v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2018

Grell’s complaint also vaguely sketches a claim under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), seeking review of an Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) determination. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A.

Corbett v. Burnet

50 F.2d 492 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1931

In these circumstances we are obliged to reach the same conclusion reached by the Board. See Burnet v. Houston, 51 S. Ct. 413 , 75 L. Ed.-, decided by the Supreme Court April 13, 1931. … In these circumstances, we think it our duty to affirm the decision of the Board.

Dilley v. Alexander

627 F.2d 407 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1980

1975 selection board. … United States, 100 F.Supp. 440 , 120 Ct.Cl. 482 (1951); Motto v. United States, 348 F.2d 523 , 172 Ct.Cl. 192 (1965); Diamond v. *359 United States, 427 F.2d 1246 , 192 Ct.Cl. 502 (1970); Yee v.

United States v. Paul K. Strother

578 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1978

In Dorman v. … In particular, he asserts that our earlier decisions in United States v. Brown, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 398 , 428 F.2d 1100 (1970), and United States v. Dorsey, 146 U.S.App.

Securities Industry Ass'n v. Comptroller of the Currency

577 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 1983

The Board’s opinion was affirmed by the Second Circuit in Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 716 F.2d 92 (2d Cir.1983). 2. … Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, supra, 716 F.2d 92 at 100 n. 4.

United States v. Young

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2024

United States v. Brown, No. 22-cr-170, 2024 WL 50977, at *2 (D.D.C. Jan. 4, 2024) (first quoting United States v. Warnagiris, 2023 WL 6926491, at *13 (D.D.C. Oct. 19, 2023), and then quoting United States v. … Brown, 2024 WL 50977, at *2 (quoting United States v. Connell, No. 21-cr-84, 2023 WL 4286191, at *2 (D.D.C. June 30, 2023)). III.

Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n

484 F. Supp. 1195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1980

See also National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States, 435 U.S. 679 , 98 S.Ct. 1355 , 55 L.Ed.2d 637 (1978); Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … See California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, supra, 404 U.S. at 513 , 92 S.Ct. at 613 ; Israel v.