Case law

M.B.E. Inc. v. Minority Business Opportunity Commission

485 A.2d 152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1984

Babazadeh v. District of Columbia Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 390 A.2d 1004, 1008 (D.C.1978). … See Vann v.

Saunders v. Caldera

193 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2001

Contractors of Am. v. … Thus, in Los Angeles v.

Butler v. California State Disbursement Unit

990 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2013

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a), and it will be dismissed.

Mason v. Director of Motor Vehicles

186 A.2d 893 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1962

provides: “No owner of * * * a motor vehicle in the District of Columbia shall allow or permit the same to be operated by any individual who is not a duly licensed operator.” 2 .Code 1961, §§ 40-302, 40-602(a); La Forest v. … Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 396 , 92 F.2d 547 (1937). 3 . Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations of the District of Columbia. 4 . La Forest v. Board of Commissioners, supra n. 2 .

Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Schweiker

686 F.2d 989 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1982

In Cleveland Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. … We add, however, that the Medicare area is one in which Congress has delegated broad discretion to the Secretary and the Board. See American Medical Int'l, Inc. v.

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Northeast Airlines, Inc., Hughes Tool Company, Northeast Airlines Master Executive Council, Alpa, International Association of MacHinists Intervenors. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Northeast Airlines, Inc., Hughes Tool Company, Northeast Airlines Master Executive Council, Alpa, International Association of MacHinists Intervenors

306 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1962

306 F.2d 753 NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v.

Hall v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2021

Rossello v. Astrue, 529 F.3d 1181, 1185 (D.C. … Fortunately, however, I need not resolve the appropriate level of deference to the Board’s 3 In U-Ahk-Vroman-Sanchez v.

United States Ex Rel. Davis v. District of Columbia

591 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013 (D.C.Cir.1988), where the court permitted a case against an independent entity (the Armory Board) to proceed, that case involved a plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive

United States v. Ali

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

See United States v. Brown, 6 Fed. Appx. 5, 5-6 (D.C. Cir. 2001); United States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327, 328-29 (D.C. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841 (1986). … See United States v.

Peoples v. United States

640 A.2d 1047 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 1994

Perkins, supra, 446 A.2d at 24 ; see also Edwards v. United States, 583 A.2d 661, 669 (D.C.1990); Wynn v. United States, 538 A.2d 1139, 1145 (D.C.1988); Brown v. … We are bound by the court’s decision in Brown as well as Perkins. See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971). 8 .

Sargent v. Paine Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

687 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 1988

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1725-26 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citations omitted). … The original opinion was ambiguous, and indeed the clarified opinion belied the Board’s confident interpretation of the original.” Id. at 354 (citations omitted)).

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

380 F.2d 603 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1967

The claim arises in a somewhat different posture than in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. R. R. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R.

Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Securities & Exchange Commission

412 F.3d 133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 2005

Ass’n v. … Inc. v.

Ifill v. District of Columbia

665 A.2d 185 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 7, 1995

See Lipsett v. … For example, in Hartman v. Board of Trustees of Community College Dist.

Young v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

918 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2007

“The Board had authority to reverse the AU’s order only if it was unsupported by substantial evidence or was legally incorrect.” Darden, 911 A.2d at 415 ; see also Gary v. … Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 881 A.2d 567 (D.C.2005) (latex allergy); Wash. Post v.

Johnson v. Gonzales

418 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009

960 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2013

Brown v. Advantage Eng’g, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). … Brown’s complaint must be unsealed. 2.

Wright v. McCann

122 A.2d 334 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1956

Co. v. Peeler, 8 Cir., 140 F.2d 865 ; Co-Efficient Foundation v. Woods, 5 Cir., 171 F.2d 691 . 5 . Backus v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass’n, D.C.Mun.App., 96 A.2d 513 ; Hornbeck v. Dain Mfg. Co., D.C.S.D. … Joyce v. L. P. Steuart, Inc., D.C.Cir., 227 F.2d 407 ; American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Morris, D.C.W.Va., 51 F.Supp. 889 , affirmed Simon v. American Casualty Co., 4 Cir., 146 F.2d 208 ; Woods v.

Nationstar Mortgage v. Rfb Properties, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2024

Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 306 F. Supp. 3d 383, 391 (D.D.C. 2016) (Brown Jackson, J.) (quoting Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 888 F. Supp. 2d 189, 191 (D.D.C. 2012)). … See M&T Bank v. Brown, No. 19-cv-00578 (JMC), 2022 WL 7003740, at *2 (D.D.C. Oct. 12, 2022); Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc. v.

Capital Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

909 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2018

. & Clinics v. NLRB , 325 F.3d 334 , 343 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … In administering that balance, the Board has adopted various presumptions. In Republic Aviation Corp. v.