Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.96s

  • Shepherd v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    514 A.2d 1184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1986

    E.g., Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 377 A.2d 436, 439 (D.C.1977); D.C.Code § l-1510(a)(3)(E) (1981). If there is, our consideration of the case is at an end. … See Upper Georgia Avenue Planning Committee v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 500 A.2d 987, 992 (D.C. 1985), and cases cited therein.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. Case

    93 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1937

    Amend. 14) Board of Public Works v. Columbia College, supra; Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 . … Thompson v. Whitman (1873) 18 Wall. 457 , 21 L.Ed. 897 ; Knowles v. Gaslight & Coke Co. (1873) 19 Wall. 58 , 22 L.Ed. 70 ; Brown v. Fletcher’s Estate (1908) 210 U.S. 82 , 28 S.Ct. 702 , 52 L.Ed. 966 ; Bigelow v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Butler v. California State Disbursement Unit

    990 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2013

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a), and it will be dismissed.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Neufield

    62 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1945

    However, in the case of Jones v. … V, D.C.Code 1929.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vereen v. Clayborne

    623 A.2d 1190 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1993

    In re Rich, 337 A.2d 764, 766 (D.C.1975); see also Brown v. Brown, 524 A.2d 1184, 1190 (D.C.1987); TVL Assocs., 474 A.2d at 159 . … See Bloomgarden, 156 U.S.App.D.C. at 119 , 479 F.2d at 211 ; see also 4934, Inc., 605 A.2d at 55 ; Brown, 524 A.2d at 1186-87 ; H.G. Smithy Co., supra note 2, 374 A.2d at 895; Zaleski v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Munsey v. Morton

    507 F.2d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1974

    decision in Phillips v. … Munsey v. Smitty Baker Coal Co., supra note 25, 79 Interior Dec. at 504. . Munsey v. Smitty Baker Coal Co., supra note 25. . 30 C.F.R. § 301.68 (1971) allocates the burden of proof. . Munsey v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Colonial Bancgroup, Inc v. Pricewaterhousecoopsers LLP

    110 F. Supp. 3d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2015

    Ci v. P. 2 6 (b) ( 1) . … See id.; Grant Thornton, LLP v. FDIC, 535 F. Supp. 2d 676, 722 (S.D.W. Va. 2007), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Ellis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Joseph Fisher v. PBGC

    994 F.3d 664 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2021

    PBGC v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 720 (1984) (citing Nachman Corp. v. PBGC, 446 U.S. 359, 361–62 (1980)). … PBGC Appeals Board, Remand 2016-0147, Joseph V. Fisher, Case No. 200185, at 3–4 (July 22, 2016) (hereinafter, 2016 Remand Decision).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rifkind v. Turner

    52 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1947

    Thrailkill v. Crosbyton-Southplains R. Co., 8 Cir., 246 F. 687 ; Hale v. Brown, 211 Ala. 106 , 99 So. 645 , affirmed 215 Ala. 177 , 110 So. 376 ; Brutinel v. … Hale v. Brown, supra; 12 C.J.S., Broker's, § 80, p. 176, n. 27; Mechem on Agency, 2d Ed. 1146, n. 82; Compare White v. Douglas Robinson, 153 App. Div. 776 , 138 N.Y.S. 992 ; Giles v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Beaumont Independent School District v. United States of America

    944 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2013

    On December 27, 2012, BISD issued a notice of deadline to file applications to run for Board seats. … See Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 558–59 (1969). Despite the language in its complaint, BISD is not currently seeking to implement “voting changes occasioned by” In re Rodriguez.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Capital Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    909 F.3d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2018

    . & Clinics v. NLRB , 325 F.3d 334 , 343 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … In administering that balance, the Board has adopted various presumptions. In Republic Aviation Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nation v. Dalton

    107 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2000

    Sargisson v. … There is no requirement that a records-correction claim first be presented for review to an appropriate Board. Under Darby v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Woodruff v. McPhie

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2009

    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957). … Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 514 (2002) (quoting Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Corrections Corp. of America

    441 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2006

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Steele v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1210 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that “it is the prisoner who can best assert the relationship between his administrative grievance and court filing”); Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Norris v. District of Columbia Government

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2010

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICOLE NORRIS, Plaintiff, v. … MEMORANDUM OPINION Nicole Norris brings this action against the Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia (“Board”)1 alleging reverse race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pettiford v. Secretary of the Navy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2011

    14 Calloway v. … ”); Poole v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palisades Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

    368 A.2d 1143 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1977

    Taylor, individually, had previously sought a variance before the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Taylor v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjust., D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973). … Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 , 202 n. 14 (1970). 7 . Allen v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Fletcher v. Fletcher

    134 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1957

    In Williams v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ortiz v. Secretary of Defense

    842 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1993

    In Mullen v. … See also, Poindexter v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. Nollie Plowman v. Secretary of Defense Secretary of the Army, 41 F.3d 738 (1994)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harborlite Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Southern Pacific Transportation Co., Intervenor

    613 F.2d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1979

    See, e. g., Board of Trade v. … See Prince Albert Pulp Co. v. Canadian National Railways, 349 I.C.C. 482 , 491 (1974); Board of Trade v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.