Case law

Plesha v. Bestline International Research, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2021

Polster offered to ask the Board to issue plaintiff $78,875 of company stock, amounting to a 0.5% interest in defendant, id., but plaintiff rejected this offer, see Pl.’s Decl. ¶ 15, ECF No. 27-2. … Pl.’s Mot. at 12–13 (quoting Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39 (D.C.

Herrod v. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc.

417 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 1976

Unemployment Compensation Board’s conduct. … Federation of Civic Associations v.

Cole v. Harrison

271 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 29, 2002

See Jago v. … See Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 823 F.2d 644, 648-49 (D.C.Cir.1987).

Patrick Thomas,petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 95, Intervenors

213 F.3d 651 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2000

Co. v. … v.

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dann

421 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 1976

Whether in fact the Board might have discriminated against Mobil, however inadvertently, the Commissioner did not consider at all relevant. II. In Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. … See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 420 , 91 S.Ct. 814 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971). In so doing, this Court is in no way implying what the Commissioner’s decision should be.

Bonilla v. United States

653 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 1987

I find that the Board’s determination is amply supported by the record. V. … See Ford Motor Company v.

Mahoney v. Doe

642 F.3d 1112 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 2011

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … Because it is not “generally desirable” to consider a facial First Amendment challenge “before it is determined that the statute would be valid as applied,” Board of Trustees of State University of New York v.

Rifkind v. Turner

52 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1947

Thrailkill v. Crosbyton-Southplains R. Co., 8 Cir., 246 F. 687 ; Hale v. Brown, 211 Ala. 106 , 99 So. 645 , affirmed 215 Ala. 177 , 110 So. 376 ; Brutinel v. … Hale v. Brown, supra; 12 C.J.S., Broker's, § 80, p. 176, n. 27; Mechem on Agency, 2d Ed. 1146, n. 82; Compare White v. Douglas Robinson, 153 App. Div. 776 , 138 N.Y.S. 992 ; Giles v.

Quainoo v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 2013

Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 496 (1969). … Date: July 10, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District

Jose Maria Gastelum-Quinones v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States

286 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1961

(See Schleich v. … Ng Fung Ho v. White, 1921, 259 U.S. 276 , 42 S.Ct. 492 , 66 L.Ed. 938 , Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan, 1947, 333 U.S. 6 , 68 S.Ct. 374 , 92 L.Ed. 433 .

Page Associates v. District of Columbia

463 A.2d 649 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1983

Keefe Co. v. *656 District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 409 A.2d 624, 625-26 (D.C.1979). … We conclude, as a matter of law, that the finding of the Board of Zoning Adjustment that appellants’ applications were not grandfathered by § 8104.7 is so clearly erroneous as to require reversal. Keefe Co. v.

George Hyman Construction Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

621 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 11, 1985

Inc. v. WMATA, No. 83-1125, slip op. at 10 (D.D.C. June 21, 1984) (quoting Board of Contract Appeals Reconsid. at 3). … Morris v. WMATA, 702 F.2d 1037, 1041 (D.C.Cir.1983); Heffez v. WMATA, 569 F.Supp. 1551, 1555-56 (D.D.C. 1983).

Fletcher v. Fletcher

134 A.2d 590 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1957

In Williams v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309, 310 , 122 F.2d 219, 220 .

Payne v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

See id. at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). B. … Brown v. Aramark Corp., 591 F.

Crowley v. Smithsonian Institution

636 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1980

Id. at 106 , 89 S.Ct. at 271 ; see also Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 511 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Brown v. Houston Independent School District, 417 U.S. 969 , 94 S.Ct. 3173 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1974); Willoughby v.

Marshall v. District of Columbia

392 F. Supp. 1012 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 1975

Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S. 599 at 603 , 81 S.Ct.. 1144 at 1146, 6 L.Ed.2d 563 . … However, in the recent decision of Brown v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., No. 73-2089 (D.C.

Hunter v. Corrections Corp. of America

441 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Steele v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 355 F.3d 1204, 1210 (10th Cir.2003) (noting that “it is the prisoner who can best assert the relationship between his administrative grievance and court filing”); Brown v.

Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius

603 F.3d 57 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 2010

Then, in 1999, the Board dismissed St. Agnes’s appeal on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction over that appeal in view of Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. … Ctr. v. Shalala, 89 F.3d 1411, 1420 (9th Cir. 1996); see Edgewater Hosp., Inc. v.

Matter of Gorfkle

444 A.2d 934 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1982

Brown. Q. Now, directing your attention to approximately 10:00 p. m. after Mr. Brown had left and returned with some wine— MR. BIRNEY: Objection, Your Honor. THE COURT: Sustained. That’s rank leading, Miss Gorfkle. MS. … Brown do or say? A. He mentioned something about his wallet was missing. Q. Do you know what his exact words were? A.

Johnson v. Veneman

569 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2008

See Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … V.