Case law

MCDANIEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 2019

See Record at 27; see also, e.g., Arocho v. … Possee’s opinion was necessarily inconsistent with the performance of one of the two jobs on which the ALJ relied at Step 5, that of sandwich board carrier, Dictionary of Occupational Titles (U.S.

State of Maine v. Sharon Carrillo

248 A.3d 193 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 2021

See State v. … State v.

United States v. Gabriel

405 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 5, 2005

Finally, in Illinois v. … In Almeida-Sanchez v.

State of Maine v. Joshua R. Nisbet

2016 ME 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2016

State v. … State v.

State of Maine v. Chittim

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 5, 2000

Coates v. Maine Employment Security Comm’‘n, 406'A.2d 94 (Me. 1979); Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products Co., 241 A.2d 802 (Me. 1968); Sabasteanski v. Pagurko, 232 A.2d 524 (Me. 1967); Miller v. … (citing Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)).

In re Maine State Raceways

105 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 19, 1952

See Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co., 8 Cir., 95 F.2d 414 . … Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co., 9 Cir., 124 F.2d 965 . (Emphasis ours.) The difficulties besetting the trustees have been previously stated and need not be repeated.

Deborah E. Lamkin v. Corrie L. Lamkin

2018 ME 76 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 12, 2018

See Rideout v. Riendeau, 2000 ME 198, ¶ 30, 761 A.2d 291; see also Troxel v. … See, e.g., Katon v.

White v. Meador

215 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Maine · May 31, 2002

V. … Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Me.1990), cannot reasonably be read to require that only an existing contract may provide the basis for an intentional interference claim in a business context.

BAYLEY'S CAMPGROUND INC v. MILLS

District Court, D. Maine · May 29, 2020

See Brown v. … Board of Health of the State of Louisiana, 186 U.S. 380 (1902), in which the Supreme Court upheld a quarantine order that barred entry of healthy persons into a municipality currently under quarantine.

FLOOD

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 17, 2026

Ashcroft v. … Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128, 133 (1990). Plaintiff’s claim that he was partially undressed and photographed while incapacitated implicates the concept of unlawful search and seizure. See Brown v.

MESNER v. FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC

District Court, D. Maine · Mar 14, 2024

Of Diane Brown (ECF No. 15) (replying to his response), Resp. to Mot. (ECF NO. 23) (responding to his own motion for sanctions), Resp. to Mot. … Kourembanas v. InterCoast Colls., 373 F. Supp. 3d 303, 320 (D. Me. 2019). In short, Mr.

Town of Anson v. Viles

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 23, 2018

See Chamberlain v. … Brown v. Habrle, 2010 ME 72, en 10, 1 A .3d 401.

Slager v. Bell

Superior Court of Maine · May 9, 2023

On August 1, 2019, 240 days after the permit was issued, Plaintiff appealed to the Town’s Zoning Board of Appeals (the “ZBA”). … Saunders v.

Dickey v. Sinclair

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2017

E.g., Brewer v. … Shaheen, Cappiello, Stein & Gordon P.A., 727 A.2d 996, 999-1000 (N.H. 1999); Bailey v. Tucker, 621 A.2d 108,115 n. 12 (Pa. 1993); Brown v. Theos, 550 S.E.2d 304,306 (S.C. 2001); Taylor v.

Richardson v. Decoste

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 18, 2014

Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp., 2001 ME 77, 1 8, 770 A.2d 653; Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. … Plaintiffs allege the ACCA and the members of the executive board of the ACCA owed Plaintiffs a fiduciary duty.

SWENSON v. FALMOUTH PUBLIC SCHOOLS

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 2020

Brown v. Trs. of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 346 (1st Cir. 1989). … Ctr. v.

Harfoush v. Maine Department of Health and Human Services

Superior Court of Maine · May 18, 2021

AngleZ Behavioral Health Services v. DHHS, 2020 ME 26 ~ 12, 226 A.3d 762; Friends ofLincoln Lakes v. Board ofEnvironmental Protection, 2010 ME 18, ~ 14,989 A.2d 1128. … See, e.g., Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). This is particularly true of documents on which the court relies in determining litigants' substantive rights. FTC v.

Dalton v. Quinn

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 23, 2009

Freeman on board, plaintiff contended that the discovery sought by defendant Quinn, which the court found to be justified, was unwarranted harassment. … E.g., Cox v. Dela Cruz, 406 A.2d 620, 622 (Me. 1979). In this case Dr.

In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation

651 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 29, 1986

In Shuman v. … See also Feyers v.

Osgood v. CU Insurance Company

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 5, 2006

Regulatory boards. … See Rippett v.