Case law

Tom We Shung v. Brownell

207 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1953

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Heikkila v. … V, 1952). 3 . See United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, 1952, 344 U.S. 33 , 73 S.Ct. 67 , decided after the decision of the District Court in the present case.

Wilkinson v. Legal Services Corp.

865 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1994

Common Cause v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 674 F.2d 921 , 928 (D.C.Cir.1982) (citation omitted); see Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. … See Dana v. McCalpin, No. 82-542 (D.D.C. Oct. 5, 1982), vacated as moot, 766 F.2d 575 (D.C.Cir.1985); cf. National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan, 663 F.2d 239, 246 (D.C.Cir.1981).

Huff v. Secretary of Navy

413 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1976

Carlson v. … Brown, U. S. Marine Corps, filed as defendant’s Exhibit A.

Hahn v. University of the District of Columbia

789 A.2d 1252 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

Kegley v. District of Columbia, 440 A.2d 1013, 1019 (D.C.1982) (citation omitted); accord, e.g., Harrison v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 758 A.2d 19, 22 (D.C.2000); Stokes v. … See Board of Community College Trustees v.

Saint Francis Medical Center v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2023

Hosps. v. Sebelius, 708 F.3d 226, 232–33 (D.C. Cir. 2013); Saint Francis Med. Center v. Azar, 894 F.3d 290, 291–92 (D.C. … Supp. 2d at 141; see also Alexandria Hosp. v. Bowen, 631 F. Supp. 1237, 1244–45 (W.D. Va. 1986); Total Care, Inc. v. Sullivan, 754 F. Supp. 1097, 1103–04 (W.D.N.C. 1991); S.F. Gen. Hosp. v.

Central United Life Insurance v. Sylvia Burwell

827 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2016

Before: BROWN and MILLETT, Circuit Judges, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion of the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). Seen in its proper context, HHS’s rule clearly misreads the PHSA, which only requires that plans are offered as independent and noncoordinated benefits.

Griffin v. United States

618 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1992

Board of Public Instr. v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 1201, 1203 (5th Cir.1969). It is a volitional act. Spradling v. Deimeke, 528 S.W.2d 759, 766 (Mo.1975). … Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1013 .

Ernest Mitchell v. John Phelan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2026

MITCHELL, LIEUTENANT, APPELLANT v. … Standard of Review When litigants challenge factfinding by a Board for Correction of military records, we apply “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard.” McKinney v.

Rodriguez v. Editor in Chief

285 F. App'x 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2008

See Younger v. … Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285-86 (D.C.Cir.2008); see also Stanton v. Dist. of Col.

Panitz v. District of Columbia

112 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1940

Schumacher v. Marble, 3 Mackey (14 D.C.) 32, 49; State v. Board of Equalizers, 84 Fla. 592 , 94 So. 681 , 30 A.L.R. 362 ; State v. Becker, 328 Mo. 541 , 41 S.W.2d 188 ; 38 Op. Atty. Gen. 252; 11 Am.Jur. 713. … That sort of case is not now before us, however. 17 See Fosgate Co. v. Kirkland, supra, n. 12 ; Bickett v. State Tax Commission, 177 N.C. 433 , 99 S.E. 415 ; State v. Board of Equalizers, supra n. 16 ; Payne & Butler v.

Intl Alli Thtrcl 39 v. NLRB

334 F.3d 27 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2003

Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C. Cir. 1994). When the Board’s decision turns on its interpretation of the NLRA, the familiar two-step Chevron test applies. Jacoby v. NLRB, 325 F.3d 301, 308 (D.C. … See FDA v.

Johnson v. Veneman

569 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2008

See Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … V.

Wilson v. United States

711 A.2d 75 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1998

In Winfield v. United States, 676 A.2d 1 (D.C.1996) (en banc), which was decided after Wilson’s trial, this court replaced the “clearly linked” standard articulated in the Brown-Beale principle. … Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093, 1097 (D.C.1979), and Beale v. United States, 465 A.2d 796, 803 (D.C.1983).

Safir v. Klutznick

526 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1981

V. … Section 704 is obviously part of chapter VII, not chapter V and thus is included under § 810 under even the Board’s construction of that statute.

Metroil, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.

724 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2010

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Samuel M. Selden v. Capitol Hill Southeast Citizens Association, Theodore I. Coe v. Capitol Hill Southeast Citizens Association, the Washington Terminal Co., Inc., the Real Estate and Improvement Company of Baltimore v. Capitol Hill Southeast Citizens Association

219 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 1955

SELDEN et al., Appellants, v. CAPITOL HILL SOUTHEAST CITIZENS ASSOCIATION et al., Appellees. Theodore I. COE et al., Appellants, v. CAPITOL HILL SOUTHEAST CITIZENS ASSOCIATION et al., Appellees. … The WASHINGTON TERMINAL CO., Inc., The Real Estate and Improvement Company of Baltimore, Appellants, v. CAPITOL HILL SOUTHEAST CITIZENS ASSOCIATION et al., Appellees. Nos. 12088, 12089, 12091.

Athens Community Hospital, Inc. v. Schweiker

686 F.2d 989 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1982

In Cleveland Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. … We add, however, that the Medicare area is one in which Congress has delegated broad discretion to the Secretary and the Board. See American Medical Int'l, Inc. v.

Weber v. Hurgten

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2009

See Weber v. Battista, 494 F.3d 179, 185 (D.C. … See Bush v. Engleman, 266 F.

Blevins v. Orr

553 F. Supp. 750 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1982

In challenging that refusal, Blevins is precluded from arguing that his personnel file was inaccurate or incomplete when considered by the FY 75 Selection Board because the decision in Blevins v. … Such claims of impropriety concerning selection boards are not ripe for judicial determination until administrative remedies are exhausted, subsequent to an AFBCMR ruling. See Knehans v.

Payne v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

See id. at 1276; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). B. … Brown v. Aramark Corp., 591 F.