Case law

Lodi Memorial Hospital v. Califano

451 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 1978

Association of American Medical Colleges v. Califano, supra, 569 F.2d at 107 . … Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Mathews, 419 F.Supp. 253, 256-57 (D.D.C. 1976).

Transport of New Jersey v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

463 F. Supp. 1117 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 1979

Although advance seat reservations are available, the general public is not restricted and anyone may board a bus at any one of the 13 pick-up points on a first-come, first-serve basis. … Transport of New Jersey, Complainant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant, Docket No. MC-C-10303, docketed November 30, 1978. .

United States v. H & R Block, Inc.

833 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2011

FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co., 246 F.3d 708, 713 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 323 (1962)). … FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. 548 F.3d 1028, 1037-38 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Brown, J.) (quoting Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325).9 See also FTC v. CCC Holdings, Inc., 605 F. Supp. 2d 26, 38 (D.D.C. 2009).

Johnson v. Gonzales

418 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

George Hyman Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

498 A.2d 563 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1985

Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-40 , 79 S.Ct. 968, 972-73 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 443 A.2d 507, 513 (D.C.1981). … Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938); Nova University v.

Gillis v. United States

400 A.2d 311 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1979

Holmes, J., in Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 343 , 41 S.Ct. 501, 502 , 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921). And the same may be said of a pointed gun or even a clinched fist. … Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 , 41 S.Ct. 501 , 65 L.Ed. 961 (1921); Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550 , 15 S.Ct. 962 , 39 L.Ed. 1086 (1895). 8 .

Gabrielian v. Gabrielian

473 A.2d 847 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1984

Gabrie-lian was not present at this meeting, 1 and was not selected to serve in any capacity on Cratina’s board. Mr. … Code Ann. § 3-101(a) (1981 Repl.Vol.); see Bourke v. Krick, 304 F.2d 501, 503 (4th Cir.1962); Kingsley v. Makay, 253 Md. 24, 27 , 251 A.2d 585, 587 (1969); Nickel v. Brown, 75 Md. 172, 185 , 23 A. 736, 739 (1892).

United States v. Joseph D. Henson, United States of America v. Joseph E. Marshall, United States of America v. Larry L. Brown, United States of America v. Ells W. Jeffries

486 F.2d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1973

486 F.2d 1292 159 U.S.App.D.C. 32 UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph D. HENSON, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph E. MARSHALL, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Larry L. BROWN, Appellant. … Luck v.

Tom We Shung v. Brownell

207 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1953

The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Heikkila v. … V, 1952). 3 . See United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, 1952, 344 U.S. 33 , 73 S.Ct. 67 , decided after the decision of the District Court in the present case.

Budik v. United States

949 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2013

only of actions taken by or regarding “special boards” and “selection boards,” as defined therein). … .”); Francis v.

Huff v. Secretary of Navy

413 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1976

Carlson v. … Brown, U. S. Marine Corps, filed as defendant’s Exhibit A.

Central United Life Insurance v. Sylvia Burwell

827 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2016

Before: BROWN and MILLETT, Circuit Judges, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion of the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). Seen in its proper context, HHS’s rule clearly misreads the PHSA, which only requires that plans are offered as independent and noncoordinated benefits.

Empire Health Foundation v. Burwell

209 F. Supp. 3d 261 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2016

Ctr., Inc. v. Sebelius, 37 F. … Both sides agree that this “if” signals that reinstatement of any appeal would be “discretionary with the Board.” Opp. at 19; Reply at 9 (agreeing appeal is in Board’s “discretion”).

Griffin v. United States

618 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1992

Board of Public Instr. v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 1201, 1203 (5th Cir.1969). It is a volitional act. Spradling v. Deimeke, 528 S.W.2d 759, 766 (Mo.1975). … Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1013 .

Ernest Mitchell v. John Phelan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2026

MITCHELL, LIEUTENANT, APPELLANT v. … Standard of Review When litigants challenge factfinding by a Board for Correction of military records, we apply “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard.” McKinney v.

Rodriguez v. Editor in Chief

285 F. App'x 756 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2008

See Younger v. … Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285-86 (D.C.Cir.2008); see also Stanton v. Dist. of Col.

Elam v. Ethical Prescription Pharmacy, Inc.

422 A.2d 1288 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1980

Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). [3] At that moment, appellant's attention was directed forward. … Brown v.

Panitz v. District of Columbia

112 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1940

Schumacher v. Marble, 3 Mackey (14 D.C.) 32, 49; State v. Board of Equalizers, 84 Fla. 592 , 94 So. 681 , 30 A.L.R. 362 ; State v. Becker, 328 Mo. 541 , 41 S.W.2d 188 ; 38 Op. Atty. Gen. 252; 11 Am.Jur. 713. … That sort of case is not now before us, however. 17 See Fosgate Co. v. Kirkland, supra, n. 12 ; Bickett v. State Tax Commission, 177 N.C. 433 , 99 S.E. 415 ; State v. Board of Equalizers, supra n. 16 ; Payne & Butler v.

Vicente Villamosa Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United States

512 F.2d 936 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 10, 1975

Rosenberg v. … See NRDC v. Train, 510 F.2d 692 at 706 (D.C.Cir., 1974), quoting Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). 19 . See Power Reactor Development Co. v.

Geracy, Inc. v. Hoover

133 F.2d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 1942

Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Newton, 8 Cir., 132 F. 450, 452 , certiorari denied 196 U.S. 641 , 25 S.Ct. 796 , 49 L.Ed. 631 ; Silberstein v. Begun, 232 N.Y. 319, 323 , 133 N.E. 904, 905 . Brown v. First Nat. … Allamong v. Falkenhof, 39 Ohio App. 515 , 177 N.E. 789, 791, 792 . Brown v. First Nat.