Case law

Tate v. Burke

131 F.R.D. 363 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 1990

In Brown v. … In Brown , the court denied the plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing his complaint.

Baptist Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius

603 F.3d 57 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 2010

Then, in 1999, the Board dismissed St. Agnes’s appeal on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction over that appeal in view of Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. … Ctr. v. Shalala, 89 F.3d 1411, 1420 (9th Cir. 1996); see Edgewater Hosp., Inc. v.

Charlton v. Donley

611 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 2009

See Smalls v. … See Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C.Cir.1989). It is established that military records correction boards’ decisions are subject to judicial review under the APA. See Dickson v.

Geracy, Inc. v. Hoover

133 F.2d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 1942

Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Newton, 8 Cir., 132 F. 450, 452 , certiorari denied 196 U.S. 641 , 25 S.Ct. 796 , 49 L.Ed. 631 ; Silberstein v. Begun, 232 N.Y. 319, 323 , 133 N.E. 904, 905 . Brown v. First Nat. … Allamong v. Falkenhof, 39 Ohio App. 515 , 177 N.E. 789, 791, 792 . Brown v. First Nat.

Shakir v. Fulwood

108 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2015

See Jones v. Braxton, 647 A.2d 1116, 1117 (D.C. 1994) (§ 104.2 “is clearly not mandatory,” as § 104.11 “expressly authorizes the Board to disregard the suggested timeframes”); Hall v. … See, e.g., Kingsbury v. Fulwood, 902 F.

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V. ) Criminal No. 21-0598 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON ) and ) ANDREW ZABAVSKY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER On September 29, 2022, … Karon Hylton-Brown’s character, criminal history, and alleged associations with the Kennedy Street Crew, and the Kennedy Drug Corridor, Pursuits (““Gov’t MPD Opp.”) [Dkt.

Herrod v. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc.

417 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 1976

Unemployment Compensation Board’s conduct. … Federation of Civic Associations v.

In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

305 F. Supp. 2d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2004

Marovitz, Britt Miller, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, IL, Catherine J. Hertzig, Jonathan Shiffman, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, D. Stuart Meiklejohn, Stacey R. … NOTES [1] See Thomas v.

Neustar, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

857 F.3d 886 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2017

Murphy, Tyrone Brown, Andrew G. McBride, Thomas J. Navin, and Brett A. Shumate.  2 David M. … In support, it urges that the Supreme Court, in AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board, 525 U.S. 366, 383 n.9 (1999), “recognized that ‘Section 251(e) . . . requires the Commission to exercise its rulemaking authority.’”

American Auto Trimming Co. v. Lucas

37 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1930

Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 200 U. S. 361 , 26 S. Ct. 272 , 50 L. Ed. 515 ; National Lead Co. v. United States, 252 U. S. 140 , 40 S. Ct. 237 , 64 L. Ed. 496 ; Uniform Printing & S. Co. v. … Bernhardt v. City & S. Ry. Co., 49 App. D. C. 265, 263 F. 1009 . Parts of the depositions considered by the Board were never in evidence, and should not have been considered.

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United Transportation Union

789 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 1992

Thornburg v. … V Conclusion The Arbitration Panel did not exceed its jurisdiction. It utilized the CNW/509 approach in a manner consistent with Pub. Law 102-29 and the interpretations by the Special Board.

Rapid City Regional Hospital v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2010

Ass’n of Virginia, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Inova Alexandria Hosp. v. Shalala, 244 F.3d 342, 349 (4th Cir. 2000); Novacare, Inc. v. Thompson, 357 F. Supp. 2d 268, 273 (D.D.C. 2005); United Home Care v.

Western Power Trading Forum v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

245 F.3d 798 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 2001

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. … San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Etc., National Mediation Board v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Etc.

402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 1968

The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy. … As we have already said, we think the ruling in Railway Clerks v. Association does authorize the Board to fashion such a requirement.

Bors v. Allen

607 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2009

Cobell v. Norton, 391 F.3d *210 251, 258 (D.C.Cir.2004). … Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F.Supp.2d 274, 279 (D.D.C.2005) (citing Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 468 (D.C.Cir.1986)).

Smith Lake Improvement v. FERC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2015

Clark Deputy Clerk * A separate statement by Circuit Judges Brown and Wilkins and Senior Circuit Judge Silberman is attached. … It points, as in its initial briefing, to language in Clifton Power Corp. v. FERC, 294 F.3d 108, 110 (D.C. Cir. 2002), and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 9 F.3d 980, 981 (D.C.

Morrison v. Mills

928 F. Supp. 2d 241 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2013

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Morrison sought a quintessential “lateral transfer” that would have no effect on her pay or benefits. Id. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 (internal quotation marks omitted). Indeed, the D.C.

Washington Post Co. v. District of Columbia

596 A.2d 517 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1991

See Glen Wall Assocs. v. … Sunday Lake Iron Co. v.

Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., Inc

183 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 16, 1950

Dunkle, 1882, 84 Ind. 544 , 43 Am.Rep. 100 ; Browning v. Jones, 1893, 52 Ill.App. 597 . 25 . Supra, notes 23 and 24. 26 . Brown v. Kistleman; Goldman v. Cohen, supra, note 5 . 27 . Dodge v. … Bernhardt v. Perry; Brown v. Kistleman; Emerson v. Taylor; Howard v. Verdigris Val. Elec. Co-op.; Kosciolek v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co.; Landwehr v. Barbas; Maloy v. Foster; McDade v. West; Nash v. Mobile & O. R.

Doe v. Secretary of the Air Force

563 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 4, 1982

Plaintiff relies on the case of Matlovich v. … In the case of Roelofs v.