Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

9.55s

  • Abo-Saif v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

    2022 IL App (1st) 211091 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2022

    In 2020, plaintiff filed this action against defendant for money damages for breach of the settlement agreement and a declaratory judgment that he should be given another opportunity to qualify for readmission to the juris … As in Ellis, “the plaintiff’s suit in the instant case is clearly based upon a present claim which has the potential to subject the State to liability and thus must be brought in the Court of Claims.” Id. at 395.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mulvey v. Carl Sandburg High School

    2016 IL App (1st) 151615 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 13, 2017

    Id. ¶ 45 Our supreme court has established a two-part test to determine which employees may be granted immunity under section 2-201 of the Tort Immunity Act. … First, an employee may qualify for immunity “if he holds either a position involving the determination of policy or a position involving the exercise of discretion.” (Emphases in original.)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Greeson v. MacKinaw Township

    207 Ill. App. 3d 193 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 13, 1990

    Clearly this function is discretionary. … It is a well established principle of the common law that an immunity exists in favor of public officials when they are exercising their official discretion on matters which are discretionary in nature and not ministerial

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Prough v. Madison County

    984 N.E.2d 1177 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 25, 2013

    The Tort Immunity Act does not establish any new duties for governmental entities but “merely codifies those duties existing at common law, to which the subsequently delineated immunities apply.” … The plain language of sections 4-102 and 4-107 of the Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/4-102, 4-107 (West 2010)) clearly apply here to immunize the defendants for these alleged failures.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Niehaus v. Rural Peoria County Council on Aging, Inc.

    314 Ill. App. 3d 665 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 23, 2000

    Act (Tort Immunity Act or Act) (745 ILCS 10/8 — 101 (West 1996)). … The court stated: “The amendment to section 1 — 206 of the Tort Immunity Act (Ill. Rev.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kitchen v. Burge

    781 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 19, 2011

    Even if Lukanich and Eannace were not entitled to absolute immunity for their conduct during this period, they would be entitled to qualified immunity. … The qualified immunity inquiry asks two questions: whether the plaintiffs allegations make out a deprivation of a constitutional right, and whether the right was clearly established at the time of defendant’s alleged misconduct

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Denson

    59 Ill. 2d 546 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1975

    It is less clear whether or not the prosecutor thought that he would be able to use the testimony given under immunity to establish that prior perjury. … Walker, 28 Ill.2d 585 , established that such testimony given under immunity could not be used for that purpose.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Melekh

    193 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 20, 1961

    The Court concludes that Melekh cannot qualify as a “public minister” as the term is used in the Constitution and in the statute. … Judge Herlands describes the immunity as a “functional” immunity, but defendant states that description is ambiguous in that a functional immunity may refer to immunity from arrests for acts done in the exercise of one’s

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Davis

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026

    The Court therefore addresses only the “clearly established law” prong of the qualified immunity analysis. … Defendants argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity because “Plaintiff did not have a clearly established right . . . to make bail payment to the county clerk,” even if the Sheriff’s Office had accepted improper

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dawson v. Brown

    81 F. Supp. 3d 670 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Feb 27, 2015

    Additionally, Warnisher and Brown contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity. A. … Qualified immunity (1) A public official may is protected by qualified immunity from liability for reasonable mistakes made in the performance of his or her duties. See Findlay v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johannesen v. Eddins

    2011 IL App (2d) 110108 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 28, 2011

    Eventually, the board granted variations establishing an eastern sideyard setback of 32 feet and a front setback of 126 feet. … . ¶ 31 Here, the trial court clearly ruled only on the motion to dismiss brought under the Act.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cipolla v. Bloom Township High School District No. 206

    69 Ill. App. 3d 434 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 22, 1979

    The public policy considerations in authorizing, and indeed encouraging, teachers to have broad discretion and latitude in the former situation quite clearly do not apply with as much force to the latter.” … These decisions establish that the rule announced by the supreme court in Kobylanski is viable and applies to actions arising out of the teacher-student relationship in matters relating to the teacher’s personal supervision

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Vickery Manor Service Corp. v. Village of Mundelein

    575 F. Supp. 996 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 13, 1983

    City of Boulder established an important guide for future eases: a general grant of power to a local governmental unit does not necessarily immunize subsequent anticompetitive conduct pursuant to that grant. … The city, contending that its denial of services to the towns was authorized by clearly articulated state policy, argued that state action immunity protected its conduct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nawrot v. CPC International

    259 F. Supp. 2d 716 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 23, 2003

    is protected by this immunity); see Bond v. … Nawrot has pointed to evidence in the record that he has collapsed at work and is unable to think clearly when suffering from a diabetic attack.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mauvis-Jarvis v. Wong

    987 N.E.2d 864 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 28, 2013

    There is no allegation they deviated from established protocol in reporting their allegations. … the defendant’s motives.”). ¶ 72 On the other hand, where only qualified privilege is granted the person making the statement is immune from liability unless some element such as malice is present.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Strauss v. City of Chi.

    346 F. Supp. 3d 1193 · District Court, E.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 2018

    DISCUSSION Defendants argue that Plaintiff lacks standing, that Plaintiff's federal claims are unripe, that Alderman Moreno is entitled to absolute and/or qualified immunity from suit in his individual capacity, and that … Immunity Defendant Moreno argues that he is entitled to absolute legislative immunity from all Plaintiff's claims.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • August v. Hanlon

    975 N.E.2d 1234 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 6, 2012

    The court further found that “there was nothing else to really look at or present to me on behalf of the Plaintiff that clearly establishes that the Defendant’s comments were not covered by the [Act].” … a new absolute or qualified privilege for defamation.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

    979 N.E.2d 954 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 23, 2012

    a standard for invoking immunity under the Act. … See id. ¶ 45; see also id. ¶ 50 (“We believe that, had the legislature intended to radically alter the common law by imposing a qualified privilege on defamation within the process of petitioning the government

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Starnes v. International Harvester Co.

    141 Ill. App. 3d 652 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 17, 1986

    When only qualified privilege is granted, the person making the statement is immune from liability unless some element such as malice is present. … The court recognized that not all complaints to administrative agencies had that immunity but if the agency had judicial powers, the same consideration requiring immunity for complaints to courts were operative.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Fairman

    951 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 2, 1997

    Defendants raise a general claim of qualified immunity, but immunity is clearly inapplicable. … Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, public officials performing discretionary functions are protected against civil liability if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.