Case law

State v. Brown

301 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1980

State v. Brown

297 N.C. 302 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1979

State v. Brown

292 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

Brown v. Smith

286 N.C. 211 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1974

State v. Brown

284 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1974

Fasset v. Brown

1 N.C. 17 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1795

Foster v. Brown

17 S.C.L. 221 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1829

Benson v. Rice & Byers, 2 N. & M. 577. Nor can the manner of obtaining the *225 administration, whether fairly or fraudulently, vary the question.

Gordon v. Brown

39 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1846

McKee v. Houston. 3 Murp. 429. Still less can a sale to raise a fund for the payment of legacies defeat a bona fide voluntary conveyance to or for a grand-son. … The substance is, that upon the death of that lady, the defendant became the trustee of the slaves for the plaintiff, subject to the incumbrance of Thomas Brown’s debt.

State v. Brown

1 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1864

Brown v. . Harding

172 N.C. 835 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

BROWN, J., not sitting. … BROWN, J., not sitting.

Brown v. . Godsey

55 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1856

See Gentrey v. Harper, ante, 177, and the cases there cited. The positive denial of the defendants makes it necessary that the plaintiff should produce something more than the testimony of a single witness.

Lea v. . Brown

58 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1860

It differs from the case of White v. Cline, 7 Jones’ Rep. 174, in two important particulars: In that case, the dome earned the money in the State of California. … because they are not allowed the same degree of freedom and privilege, and should such a thing often occur, it would give rise to a kind of trust, of which the courts of Equity cannot take notice and enforce; see Barker v.

Brown v. . Lutterloh

1 N.C. 556 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1802

The jury were, in fact, sworn to try the title of Joseph Brown, and not whether Joseph Brown made the lease to John Doe stated in the declaration, and whether he entered, etc., and Richard Roe ousted him, etc.; consequently … So, in Adams v. Goose , Cro.

State v. . Brown

53 N.C. 443 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1862

Coltraine v. Brown

71 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1874

There was not only a direct conflict of testimony between Dempsey Brown and Brazier on the one side,, and the witnesses for the propounders on the other, as to the mental capacity of the testatrix, Jane Brown \ but Frazier … As the question involved in this case is discussed and decided in Isler v. Dewey, at .this term, we content ourselves with a reference to the opinion in that case. Let it be certified that there is error. Per Cujriam.

Brown v. Boone

318 N.C. 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1987

State v. Brown

315 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1986

Petition by defendant (Brown) for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 January 1986.

Brown v. Fulford

308 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Brown v. . Electric Co.

138 N.C. 533 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1905

Story v. N. Y. Elec. R. R., 90 N. Y., 122 ; White v. Railroad, 113 N. C., 610 ; Phillips v. Telegraph Co., 130 N. C., 513 ; Hodges v. Tel. Co., 133 N. C., 225 . … While it is held in Tate v.

Purdy v. Brown

306 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 1982