Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

2.16s

  • Brown v. Director of Revenue

    85 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 24, 2002

    In McCabe v. … In Smyth v.

    Overruled on other grounds by White v. Director of Revenue, 2010 Mo. LEXIS 194 (2010)Cited 51 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    131 S.W.3d 856 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 2004

    Brown’s first degree assault and armed criminal action convictions on direct appeal and affirmed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. State v. Brown, 871 S.W.2d 136 (Mo.App. E.D.1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    122 S.W.3d 705 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2003

    Scott Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion submitted on depositions in lieu of an evidentiary hearing. 1 The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. … Brown’s conviction for first degree murder of his wife was affirmed in State v. Brown, 18 S.W.3d 34 (Mo.App. E.D.2000); see also State v. Brown, 984 S.W.2d 535 (Mo.App. E.D.1998) (reversing grant of new trial).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McFadin v. Board

    188 Mo. 688 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1905

    This is an action for partition and assignment of dower, which was tried below on an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that on the 5th day of July, 1902, Thomas Board died seized of a farm of 179.5 acres in … Board, and one child by her, the plaintiff, *691 Laura A. McFadin, Ms only heir at law.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    101 S.W.3d 365 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2003

    State v. West, 952 S.W.2d 713, 714 (Mo.App.1997). Brown’s statement of facts fails to provide this Court with any facts relating to the issues he presents on the denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion. In Overall v. … Although Brown is proceeding pro se, he is bound by the same rules of procedure as an attorney. State v. Nenninger, 872 S.W.2d 589, 590 (Mo.App.1994). .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    87 S.W.3d 868 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2002

    Christopher Scott Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. … State v. Brown, 50 S.W.3d 320 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). Following a jury trial, the trial court sentenced Movant to fifteen years imprisonment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Milner Hotel

    332 S.W.2d 59 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1960

    Ambrose v. M. F. A. CoOperative Ass’n, Mo., 266 S.W.2d 647 ; Wildermuth v. Fred Medart Manufacturing Co., Mo.App., 330 S.W.2d 126 ; Parenteau v. Parenteau, Mo.App., 305 S.W.2d 723 ; Peterson Co. v. … Durant v. Industrial Products Mfg. Co., 241 Mo.App. 266 , 235 S.W.2d 574 ; Quinn v. T. M. Sayman Products Co., Mo.App., 296 S.W. 198 , 199.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Union Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Brown)

    249 B.R. 525 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 12, 2000

    Ipsen v. Higher Educ. Assistance Found. (In re Ipsen), 149 B.R. 583, 585 (Bankr.W.D.Mo. 1992); lohnson v. USA Funds, Inc. (In re Johnson), 121 B.R. 91, 93 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1990). 6 . Andresen v. … See Id. at n. 3 (citing Rivers v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In re Rivers), 213 B.R. 616, 618 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1997); Heckathorn v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kansas City

    311 S.W.2d 360 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1958

    De Maire v. Thompson, 359 Mo. 457 , 222 S.W.2d 93 ; Gedville v. Mahacek, Mo.App., 231 S.W. 2d 305 . … See Derschow v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 339 Mo. 63 , 95 S.W.2d 1173 ; Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co., 332 Mo. 1150 , 61 S.W.2d 328 ; Hoffman v. Illinois Terminal R. Co., Mo.App., 274 S.W.2d 591 ; Berry v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    77 S.W.3d 698 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2002

    Rodney Brown (movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. … We affirmed movant’s sentence by an order in State v. Brown, 982 S.W.2d 796 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). Subsequently, movant filed his Rule 29.15 motion and requested an evidentiary hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    68 S.W.3d 622 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2002

    See Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721 (Mo. banc 2002); Soutee v. State, 51 S.W.3d 474 (Mo.App. S.D.2001); Carmons v. State, 26 S.W.3d 382 (Mo.App. W.D.2000); McVay v. State, 12 S.W.3d 370 (Mo.App. S.D.2000). … The Supreme Court of Missouri specifically recognized in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Collins

    46 S.W.3d 650 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2001

    (quoting State v. Ealy, 624 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Mo.App. W.D.1981)). … (citing Triplett v. St. Louis Pub. Serv.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wallace

    52 S.W.3d 21 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 2001

    Gra ham v. County Med. Equip. Co., Inc., 24 S.W.3d 145, 150 (Mo.App.2000). … Mosher v. Levering Invs., Inc., 806 S.W.2d 675, 677 (Mo. banc 1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bates v. Brown Shoe Co.

    342 Mo. 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 3, 1938

    In State ex rel. v. … [Banks v. Morris Co., 302 Mo. 254 , l.c. 273, 257 S.W. 482 ; Ziegelmeier v. East St. Louis Suburban Ry. Co., 330 Mo. 1013 , 51 S.W.2d 1027 , l.c. 1029 (2-3); Ridge v. Jones, 335 Mo. 219 , 71 S.W.2d 713 ; Edwards v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Arnett & Brown v. Dodson

    10 Mo. 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1847

    Brown then said he would go out and throw him, Dodson, out. … Brown’s services were to be performed on a quantum meruit. He was present at the settlement of Brown’s account.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Globe Printing Co.

    213 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1908

    Brown, the prosecuting attorney who is to try him, made an affidavit of that fact. Mr. Brown knew it was untrue’when he made it. … J. 362; Saunders v. Mills, supra; Flint v. Pike, 10 E. C. L. 380; Lake v. King, 1 Saund. 120 ; Rex v. Creevey, supra; Rex v. Lord Abingdon, 1 Esp. 226.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

    80 Mo. 457 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

    Glass v. Gelvin, ante, p. 297; Benson v. C. & A. R. R., Co., 78 Mo. 504 ; Bank v. Armstrong, 62 Mo. 59 ; Moffatt v. Conklin, 35 Mo. 453 ; Bank v. Murdock & Armstrong, 62 Mo. 70 . … But in Pinney v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co.

    350 Mo. 831 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1943

    [Jackson v. Scott County Milling Co., 118 S. W. (2d) 1054 , 1056; 15 C. J. S., p. 1001; 12 C. J., p. 583; 11 Am. Jur., p. 578 ; Harelson v. Tyler, 281 Mo. 383 , 219 S. … We think that Fleming v. Dane (Mass.), 22 N. E. (2d) 609, 611 (1-3); DesLauries v. Shea (Mass.), 13 N. E. (2d) 932, 935, (3-9); and Neustadt v. Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp. (Mass.), 21 N.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Reorganization Investment Co.

    350 Mo. 407 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1942

    [Berberet v. … [See also Douglas v. Lang (Mo. App.), 124 S.W.2d 642 ; Murphy v. Electric Park Amusement Co., 209 Mo. App. 638 , 241 S.W. 651 ; Hollis v. Kansas City Retail Merchants' Assn., 205 Mo. 508 , 103 S.W. 32 ; Young v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    23 S.W.3d 930 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 2000

    State v. Brown, supra, explains what transpired in movant’s forgery case: On July 14, 1997, a Christian County jury convicted [movant] on one count of forgery. … State v. Wright, 763 S.W.2d 167, 168 (Mo.App.1988). See also State v. Gilmore, 727 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.App.1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.