Case law

Davis v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 13, 2005

Puffer-Hefty School District No. 69 v. Du Page Regional Board of School Trustees , 339 Ill. App. 3d 194, 201 (2003). … Robertson v. City of Salem , 191 F. Supp. 605 (D. Or. 1961) (ordinance precluding business uses was unconstitutional taking); Board of Commissioners of State Institutions v.

Godfrey v. Brown

86 Ill. 454 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1877

It was levied upon by defendant by virtue of an execution in his hands against the goods and chattels of George Brown, and the only contention is whether it is the property of plaintiff or the execution debtor.

Mann v. Brown

182 Ill. App. 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 3, 1913

V 3342, preserving to the parties the right of trial by jury. Grldley, J., dissenting. 4. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 13*—-when affidavit of merits may be stricken from files.

Brown v. Duncan

Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 1, 2005

Bonaguro v. County Officers Electoral Board , 158 Ill. 2d 391, 395 (1994). … DuPage County Election Comm'n v. State Board of Elections , 345 Ill. App. 3d 200, 205 (2003); Edwardsville School Service Personnel Ass'n, IEA-NEA v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board , 235 Ill.

Brown v. Haggerty

26 Ill. 469 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1861

Brown, who was security on the note, insisted, on the trial, that the note had been paid and taken up by Dunlap, while the plaintiff insisted that the payment was designed to be made, and was in fact made on the other note … Brown was not guilty of any mistake or laches, while the plaintiff, or his agent, was, and he should consequently bear the loss, if any. The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded. Judgment reversed.

People v. Brown

30 Ill. App. 3d 828 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 1, 1975

(In re Estate of Kelly, 365 Ill. 194, 196 (1936); People v. Jashunsky, 51 Ill.2d 220, 224 (1972).) … In this case, however, mitigating circumstances exist which distinguish it from People v. Bennett.

The People v. Brown

38 Ill. 2d 353 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1967

In People v. … Consequently, the trial court did not err in denying Brown’s motion to suppress. See People v. Jones, post, p. 427.

The People v. Brown

383 Ill. 287 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1943

People v. Montana, 380 Ill. 596 . In the case of People v. Hartsig, 249 Ill. 348 , a similar question arose. … In the case of People v. Casady, 250 Ill. 426 , the court erroneously sentenced the defendant under the Indeterminate Sentence Act for a period not exceeding five years.

People v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 25, 2005

Carl Brown appeals from a summary judgment removing him from the position of Kankakee County Park District board member, a position to which he was elected on April 10, 2001. … The court then found that, by virtue of his election to the second position of alderman, Brown was ousted from his position as member of the park district board.

Brown v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 100 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 30, 1980

People v. Brown

267 Ill. App. 3d 482 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 12, 1994

JUSTICE GREIMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial, defendant Robert Brown was convicted of vehicular invasion for his participation with codefendant Anthony King in a smash and grab robbery and received … People v.

People v. Brown

132 Ill. App. 2d 256 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 17, 1971

We find no substantial differences between the factual situation and issues presented in this case and tihose arising in People v. Ackerman et al. (1971), 132 Ill.App.2d 251 , filed this date. … The sentence is hereby vacated and the cause remanded, on the plea and judgment of guilty, for sentencing procedures consistent with those expressed in People v. Ackerman, supra at 251 .

The People v. Brown

30 Ill. 2d 297 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1964

Two of the boys stepped out of the elevator, as did -Brown, and the boys testified that both Kyler and Brown had “shiny objects” in their hands. … People v. Pittman, 28 Ill.2d 100 ; People v. Trefonas, 9 Ill.2d 92, 98 .

Brown v. Phillips

6 Ill. App. 250 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 27, 1880

Dowling v. Stewart, 3 Scam. 195 ; Badgley v. Heald, 4 Gil. 64 ; T. P. & W. Ry. Co. v. Pence, 71 Ill. 274 . The amount indorsed on the summons and entered on the justice’s docket, concludes the plaintiff. … As was said in Ellis v.

Brown v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 283 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 8, 1979

Brown is not entitled to that pay period from the Department of Labor. He is, therefore, entitled to only 16 pay periods as opposed to the 17 for which he made claim. Except for the fact that Mr. … Brown was employed by the State of Illinois on June 30, 1978, the issues raised in this case are identical to those in the case of John J. Beard v. State of Illinois, 78-CC-1585.

Brown v. Nelson

309 Ill. App. 557 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 12, 1941

The court quoted from Leupold v. … In Krupp v.

People v. Brown

Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 29, 2005

People v. Boose , 66 Ill. 2d at 265-66. … The majority cites People v. Doss , 347 Ill.

Brown v. State

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 194 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 18, 1950

Brown started to pick up a piece of concrete. As he lifted, he felt a sharp pain in his right hip region. Although the pain persisted, Mr. Brown continued working. He consulted his family physician, Dr. J. … Rufus Brown, who was operated upon on December 7, 1948 at Barnes Hospital, was seen on June 9, 1949. He had moderate limitation of back motions in all directions.

Brown v. State

22 Ill. Ct. Cl. 231 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 10, 1956

On August 16, 1953, claimant, Iva Ann Brown, a resident of St. Louis, Missouri, attended the Illinois State Fair at Springfield, Illinois.

Brown v. State

5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 366 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 12, 1927