Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersAL

10,000+ results

1.05s

  • Brown v. State

    20 Ala. App. 112 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1924

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    214 Ala. 603 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 15, 1926

    Petition of Alex Brown for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the -judgment and decision of that court in Brown v. State, 108 So. 542 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hester v. Brown

    512 F. Supp. 2d 1228 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 25, 2007

    .”); Yanez v. … V.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    15 Ala. App. 568 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1917

    Co., etc., v. … See King v. State, 151 Ala. 12 , 44 South. 200 ; Brewer v. State, 113 Ala. 106 , 21 South. 355 ; Wright v. State, 156 Ala. 108 , 47 South. 201 . Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Irvin v. Brown

    201 Ala. 669 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1918

    . § 1620; Interstate Land & Investment Co. v. Logan, 196 Ala. 196 , 72 South. 36 , and authorities; Prickett v. Sibert, 75 Ala. 315 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Benefield

    757 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 2010

    Plaintiffs Angela Brown, Marcus Brown, and two minors T.B., and Z.W. (collectively, the Plaintiffs) sued Defendants Ronnie Benefield, R.C. … Plaintiffs Angela Brown, Marcus Brown, T.B., and Z.W. were at home when the deputies entered.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lindsey v. Brown

    18 Ala. App. 568 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 9, 1922

    Black v. Montgomery, 17 Ala. App. 245 , 84 South. 308 ; Cook v. Echols, 16 Ala. App. 606 , 80 South. 680 . The child in question is 6 years old, being one of 9 living children, the oldest being 11 years old. … The judgment of the judge of probate, awarding the custody and control of the child to petitioner, is reversed, and one here rendered, awarding the custody and control of the child, Ora Dee Brown, to appellant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Brown

    24 Ala. App. 264 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1931

    Cable Co. v. Jones, 133 Ala. 217 , 32 So. 500 . … Byrd v. Jones, ante, p. 65, 130 So. 162 ; Supreme Court Rule 45. The ease was fairly tried, and the judgment ought not to be disturbed. It is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Brown

    252 Ala. 618 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 16, 1949

    Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co., 217 Ala. 153 , 115 So. 94 , 55 A.L.R. 1231 . … The allegations of the bill clearly bring it within the principle stated by this court in Loftin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Burrell

    230 Ala. 577 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1935

    There were three defendants, Mack Brown, T. S. Brown, and Dora Brown. … Powell v. Robinson & Ledyard, 76 Ala. 423 . The execution of the mortgage to plaintiff by all the defendants was proven and same offered in evidence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Johnson Bros.

    127 Ala. 292 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1899

    In Toomer v. … In the later case of Montgomery v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Holston

    227 Ala. 225 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 8, 1933

    Salene v. Queen City Fire Ins. Co., 59 Or. 297 , 116 P. 1114 , 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 438, Ann. Cas. 1916D, 1276, and note; Clay v. Cummins, 201 Ala. 34 , 77 So. 328 ; Spivy-Johnson Portrait Co. v. … THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    33 Ala. App. 634 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 18, 1948

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    19 Ala. App. 524 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1924

    Lide v. State, 133 Ala. 43, 63 , 31 South. 953 . … Bacon v. U. S. Mut. Acc. Assn., 44 Hun, 599 , 602 (3). “Any substance which,” when introduced into the animal organism, “seriously disturbs or destroys the vital functions.” State v. Baldwin, 36 Kan. 1 , 12 Pac. 318 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    17 Ala. App. 414 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1920

    In Maisel v. State, 81 South. 348 , 1 this court differentiated the effects between presumptions of law and presumptions of fact. The rule there laid down is applicable here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Legg

    17 Ala. App. 227 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 11, 1919

    Reed v. Maben, 21 Neb. 696 , 33 N. W. 252 ; Oliver v. Kenny, 173 Ala. 602 , 56 South. 203 . … National Union v. Sherry, Ala. 627, 61 South. 944 ; Francis-Chenoweth Hdw. Co. v. Bailey, 104 Ala. 566 , 18 South. 10 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    22 Ala. App. 31 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1927

    Lemons & Martin v. State, 50 Ala. 130 . … The case of Perry et al. v. State, 149 Ala. 40 , 43 So. 19 , cited by appellant to sustain their insistence in this connection, is not in point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Leek

    227 Ala. 312 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 5, 1933

    Brown for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Brown v. Leek, 25 Ala. App. 497 , 149 So. 854 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    30 Ala. App. 149 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 13, 1941

    The questions of law presented by this appeal are of the same import as those in the appeal of the case of Arnold v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    18 Ala. App. 683 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1922

    Yates v. State, ante, p. 435, 93 South. 62 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.