Case law

Ritchie v. Drier

165 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1947

Gesellschaft v. Brown, 64 App.D.C. 357 , 78 F.2d 410 , certiorari denied 296 U.S. 618 , 56 S.Ct. 139 , 80 L.Ed. 439 ; Brown v. Gesellschaft, 70 App.D.C. 94 , 104 F.2d 227 . … Sakon v. Santini, 257 Mich. 91 , 241 N.W. 160 .

Carstens v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

742 F.2d 1546 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 7, 1984

In each case the Board simply concluded, as was its province to do, see Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor *404 Relations Board, supra, 340 U.S. at 495-97 , 71 S.Ct. at 468-469 ; Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. … See also FPC v.

Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local No. 71, A/W International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America v. National Labor Relations Board

553 F.2d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1977

. 25 The Board's decisions in these matters are, as we stated in Miami Newspaper Printing Pressmen's Union Local 46 v. … In Humphrey v.

Pippenger v. U.S. Doge Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2025

Institute of Peace v. … Ramirez v. Collier, 595 U.S. 411, 421 (2022) (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)).

Morgan v. District of Columbia

618 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 1985

Curry-Bey v. Jackson, 422 F.Supp. 926, 932 (D.D.C.1976). … Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125, 1130 (D.C.Cir.1983).

Allied Pilots Association v. American Airlines, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2010

10 United Steelworkers of Am. v. … Postal Serv. v. Am.

Smith v. Helvering

141 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1944

The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed. … See also, Lewellyn v.

Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States

246 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1957

246 F.2d 711 101 U.S.App.D.C. 24 PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE, Inc., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America and Federal Maritime Board, Respondents, City of Portland, Oregon, The Port of Seattle, and E. … Certainly the question of adequacy of service was peculiarly within the competency of the Board to resolve. United States Nav. Co. v. Cunard S.S. Co., 1932, 284 U.S. 474, 485 , 52 S.Ct. 247 , 76 L.Ed. 408 .

Tumulty v. District of Columbia

102 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1939

Holly Sugar Corp. v. Board of Com’rs, D.C., 10 F.2d 506 . … Mitts, supra, note 12 ; State Board of Tax Com’rs v. McDaniel, 199 Ind. 708 , 160 N.E. 347 . 22 Clark v. Wells, 203 U.S. 164 , 27 S.Ct. 43 , 51 L.Ed. 13S; U. S. v.

James Bakalis & Nickie Bakalis, Inc. v. Simonson

434 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1970

Appellant’s first claim in both cases is that the Board disregarded the substantial evidence standard. As we noted in Am-Chi Restaurant, Inc. v. … However, some mixing of functions by the Board is a necessary part of the administrative scheme and does not per se violate due process. F.T.C. v.

In Re Darwin Charles Brown

454 F.2d 999 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1971

departments or government boards, commissions, or agencies. … Appellee points to a conviction appellant had previously suffered, sec Brown v. United States, No. 19,460 (D.C.Cir.

Association of Flight Attendants v. Western Airlines, Inc.

662 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 1987

See General Committee of Adjustment v. Missouri-K-T. Ry., 320 U.S. 323, 335-38 , 64 S.Ct. 146, 151-53 , 88 L.Ed. 76 (1943); Switchmen’s Union v. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 303-07 , 64 S.Ct. 95, 98-100 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); International Brotherhood of Teamsters v.

Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits Section

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2023

See Watson v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth., 249 F. Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). A. … The act created the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”), a “quasi-judicial agency” that adjudicates some civil-service-related disputes. See Zummer v.

United States Ex Rel. Davis v. District of Columbia

591 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013 (D.C.Cir.1988), where the court permitted a case against an independent entity (the Armory Board) to proceed, that case involved a plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive

Cunningham v. United States

974 A.2d 240 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2009

See Brown v. … See Coles v. United States, 808 A.2d 485, 489 (D.C.2002); see also Brown, supra, 683 A.2d at 124 (citing Ford v. United States, 549 A.2d 1124, 1126 (D.C.1988)).

In re Alexei

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 2024

Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. … See, e.g., Ginberg v.

In Re Lawrence C. Pope

580 F.2d 620 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1978

Ellinburg v. Connett, 457 F.2d 240, 241 (5th Cir. 1972); Cohen v. United States, 297 F.2d 760, 774 (9th Cir. 1962); Turner v. Kelly, 411 F.Supp. 1331, 1332 (D.Kan.1976); Ott v. … As we stated in Starnes v.

Hoffman v. District of Columbia

643 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2009

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … See Brown v.

In Re Gansler

889 A.2d 285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2005

See Attorney Grievance Comm. of Md. v. Gansler, 377 Md. 656 , 835 A.2d 548, 574 (2003). … We accept the Board’s conclusion and recommendation.

Shinogee Ex Rel. Duffy v. Fanning

234 F. Supp. 3d 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2017

benefits based on the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ decision. … Board’s prior action, and (2) the Board had previously reconsidered the matter.