Case law

Kim v. Brownlee

344 F. Supp. 2d 758 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2004

See Saunders v. White, 191 F.Supp.2d 95, 120 (D.D.C.2002). … V.

New LifeCare Hospitals v. Xavier Becerra

7 F.4th 1215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2021

See Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. … Hosp. of Monterey Peninsula v.

Allen v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

784 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1992

See Rastall v. CSX Corp., 696 F.Supp. 683, 684 (D.D.C.1988); see also Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. National Mediation Board, 189 F.2d 685 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 77 , 96 L.Ed. 641 (1951). … In Rastall v.

Grant Medical Center v. Burwell

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2016

(Board), and the Board consolidated the appeals. … Johnson, 969 F.2d at 1091; see also id. at 1092 (comparing nonacquiescence to Governor Orval Faubus’ defiance of Brown v. Bd. of Education, 373 U.S. 493 (1954), at Little Rock) (citing Lopez, 725 F.2d. at 1497).

Lawson v. United States

596 A.2d 504 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1991

Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 230 , 74 S.Ct. 450, 451 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954). After taking testimony both from Mr. Brown and other witnesses, the court found that Mr. … Brown had not seen any gambling at the after-hours establishment and that his judgment was not affected. The court also credited Brown’s statement that he did not mention this chance meeting to other jurors.

Teamsters Local 115, A/w International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Haddon House Food Products, Inc. And Flavor Delight, Inc., Intervenors. Haddon House Food Products, Inc. And Flavor Delight, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Teamsters Local Union No. 115, Intervenor

640 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1981

Co. v. … Workers v.

Dyson v. Hagel

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2014

Smith v. Dalton, 971 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing Mondy v. Sec’y of the Army, 845 F.2d 1051, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1988)). … DATE: July 2, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Gabina Camacho Lopez v. Manuel Rodriguez and Mirtha Rodriguez

668 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 20, 1981

See Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c); Mumbower v. Callicott, 526 F.2d 1183 , 1187 n.5 (8th Cir. 1975); Hodgson v. … Davis Bros., Inc. v. Marshall, 522 F.Supp. 628 (N.D.Ga.1981); Morrison, Inc. v. Marshall, No. 80-0228-P (S.D.Ala. June 15, 1981); Walling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co., 49 F.Supp. 846, 895 (W.D.La. 1943).

Bors v. Allen

607 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2009

Cobell v. Norton, 391 F.3d *210 251, 258 (D.C.Cir.2004). … Qualls v. Rumsfeld, 357 F.Supp.2d 274, 279 (D.D.C.2005) (citing Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 468 (D.C.Cir.1986)).

Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

682 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 2010

INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the pro se plaintiffs motion for recusal and motion to vacate. 1 The plaintiff brought suit challenging the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) to … Comm’ns Co. v. Am. Tel. & Tel.

In Re LR

640 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1994

See, e.g., Shepard v. … See Willcher v. United States, 408 A.2d 67 (D.C. 1979) (Willcher I) ; Gregory v. United States, 393 A.2d 132 (D.C.1978). [4] Cf.

Federal Trade Commission v. Manager, Retail Credit Company, Miami Branch Office

515 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1975

Browning, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 292 , 295 n. 7, 435 F.2d 96 , 99 n. 7 (1970). Claims of secrecy of subpoenaed information have generally proved no barrier to discovery by the FTC. FTC v. … See generally Automatic Canteen Co. v.

Coleman v. United States

311 A.2d 496 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1973

In contending for the application of the Housing Regulations, the tenants sought to bring into play in these cases the holding of this court in Brown v. … In Knox Hill Tenant Council v.

McConnell v. Howard University

621 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 1985

See Smith v. Kent State University, 696 F.2d 476 (6th Cir.1983); Stastny v. Board of Trustees of Central Washington University, 32 Wash.App. 239 , 647 P.2d 496, 502, 506-07 (1982), cert. denied, 103 S.Ct. 1528 (1983). … As in Williams v.

Canal Refining Co. v. Corrallo

616 F. Supp. 1035 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1985

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 290-94, 316-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1711-13, 1725-28 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Id. at 746-47; see also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 441 U.S. at 318 , 99 S.Ct. at 1726 . Second, the procedures here were not “severely defective” in any event. See National Organization for Women v.

Bannout v. Brownell

129 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 1955

The Government contends, on the authority of Heikkila v. … In fact, any other construction would raise a serious question as to the validity of the regulation in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Morgan v.

National Rifle Ass'n of America v. Young

134 F.2d 524 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1943

State Board of Assessment, 302 U.S. 95 , 58 S.Ct. 102 , 82 L.Ed. 72 . 4 Mohawk Mills Association v. Miller, 260 App.Div. 433 , 22 N.Y.S.2d 993 . 5 In re De Peyster’s Estate, 210 N.Y. 216 , 104 N.E. 714, 715 . … Stanford University Book Store v. Helvering, 65 App. D.C. 364 , 83 F.2d 710 . Cf. Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, 296 U.S. 369, 373, 374 , 56 S.Ct. 285 , 80 L.Ed. 278 ; Roche’s Beach, Inc., v.

Crowley v. Smithsonian Institution

636 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1980

Id. at 106 , 89 S.Ct. at 271 ; see also Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504, 511 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Brown v. Houston Independent School District, 417 U.S. 969 , 94 S.Ct. 3173 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1974); Willoughby v.

Emory v. Secretary of the Navy

708 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 1989

This Court is not a super selection board and cannot “second [guess] the appropriate military officials whose job it is to decide these military personnel promotion matters.” Braddock v. … There is a strong presumption that the selection board members faithfully discharged their duties. Neal v. Secretary of the Navy, 639 F.2d 1029, 1037 (3d Cir.1981).

Cone v. Caldera

46 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 1999

See Castañeda v. … See also Small v.