Case law

Higbee v. Billington

290 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2003

Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 818-19 (D.C.Cir.2001) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)). An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Christopher Code v. Ryan McCarthy

959 F.3d 406 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2020

Over Code’s objection, the district court granted the Secretary’s motion for voluntary remand to allow the Board to “address the inadequacies” raised by Code’s complaint. Code v. McHugh, 139 F. … J. at 13, Code v. Speer, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C. Jan. 16, 2018), ECF No. 20-1; Am. Compl. ¶ 113, Code v. Speer, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C. Apr. 13, 2017), ECF No. 17; Compl. ¶¶ 77-78, Code v. McHugh, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C.

United States v. Brisbane, George

367 F.3d 910 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 2004

See United States v. Edwards, 98 F.3d 1364, 1369 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Brown, 859 F.2d at 976; Sentencing Commission Report at 4–5 & n.17; Cooper, supra note 1, at 60–62. … Id. at 1132 (Brown, J., concurring and dissenting in part).

United States v. Sutton

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2022

United States v. Sutton, Crim. No. 21-0598, 2022 WL 1202741, at *12 (D.D.C. Apr. 22, 2022). … Hylton-Brown’s crash and death. Although the arrest reports might possibly illustrate Mr.

Lopez v. Touchup Cleaning Services LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 2020

Because Lopez has adequately demonstrated the defendants’ liability and that she is entitled to monetary relief, the Court will enter default judgments against Touchup Cleaning, Milton Bell, Leon Brown, Sr., and Leon Brown … Here, Lopez alleges that Milton Bell, Leon Brown, Sr., and Leon Brown, Jr. were owners, officers, directors and/or members of Touchup Cleaning and were substantially involved in Touchup Cleaning’s operations.

Newman v. District of Columbia

518 A.2d 698 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1986

Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982), and McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). … Alexander, supra, 415 U.S. at 48 , 94 S.Ct. at 1019 ; see also Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454, 459 , 95 S.Ct. 1716, 1719 , 44 L.Ed.2d 295 (1975). Subsequently, the Supreme Court in Brown v.

DISTRICT HOSP. PARTNERS, LP v. Sebelius

794 F. Supp. 2d 162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 5, 2011

If the Board determines that it lacks the authority to decide the question, it will certify the question for “expedited judicial review.” See id.; see also Heartland Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. … . § 405.1842 (a)(1) (provider may seek review of “a legal question relevant to a specific matter at issue in a Board appeal” (emphasis added)); see also Shalala v. Ill.

Cherry-Burrell Corporation v. Coe

143 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1944

Appellant is complaining, instead, of the Board’s refusal to consider new claims, upon an untimely petition for reconsideration of its decision concerning other claims. The law, as declared in Lucke v. … Potts v. Coe, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 300 , 140 F.2d 470, 473 ; Radtke Patents Corp. v. Coe, 74 App.D.C. 251 , 122 F.2d 937 ; Kirsch Mfg. Co. v.

Morgan v. District of Columbia

618 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 1985

Curry-Bey v. Jackson, 422 F.Supp. 926, 932 (D.D.C.1976). … Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125, 1130 (D.C.Cir.1983).

CAPITOL CAB COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Darden

169 A.2d 463 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1961

Darden v. Capitol Cab *464 Cooperative Association, Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 154 A.2d 352 . … of directors but disapproved by defendant’s membership; that about September 17, 1956, the board of directors again approved the contract and so notified plaintiff, but the Board’s action was never submitted to the membership

Organic Trade Ass'n v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

370 F. Supp. 3d 98 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 2019

."); but see Lamie v. … recommendations by this Board."

Hamilton Nat. Bank v. District of Columbia

176 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1949

The Board of Tax Appeals affirmed the Assessor, whereupon a petition for review was filed with this court, which was disposed of by our opinion in Hamilton National Bank v. … Bank v.

Villarreal-Dancy v. United States Department of the Air Force

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2021

authority, see Buckley v. … See Lucia v. SEC, 138 S.

Fleming v. Tate

156 F.2d 848 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1946

Keeney had authority, but he must have been an employee, not a member, of the Board. The Board revoked the parole “Because of the failure of the parolee to obtain permission of the Board to leave his parole limits”. … Affirmed 1 Anderson v. Corall, 1923, 263 U.S. 193 , 44 S.Ct. 43 , 68 L.Ed. 247 ; Story v. Rives, 1938, 68 App.D.C. 325 , 97 F.2d 182 . 2 D.C.Code (1940) § 24—206. 3 Cf. Johnson v.

United States v. Scurry

318 F. Supp. 3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2018

Information obtained from the Savoy taps implicated co-defendant James Brown, and the FBI obtained authorization to tap Brown's cell phone from September 13, 2010 to October 12, 2010. … See U.S. v. Dewalt , 92 F.3d 1209 , 1212 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v.

Panitz v. District of Columbia

112 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1940

Schumacher v. Marble, 3 Mackey (14 D.C.) 32, 49; State v. Board of Equalizers, 84 Fla. 592 , 94 So. 681 , 30 A.L.R. 362 ; State v. Becker, 328 Mo. 541 , 41 S.W.2d 188 ; 38 Op. Atty. Gen. 252; 11 Am.Jur. 713. … That sort of case is not now before us, however. 17 See Fosgate Co. v. Kirkland, supra, n. 12 ; Bickett v. State Tax Commission, 177 N.C. 433 , 99 S.E. 415 ; State v. Board of Equalizers, supra n. 16 ; Payne & Butler v.

Kidney Center of Hollywood v. Shalala

63 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 1999

See ICC v. Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270, 284-85 , 107 S.Ct. 2360 , 96 L.Ed.2d 222 (1987) (citing Outland v. CAB, 284 F.2d 224, 227 (D.C.Cir.1960)).. See also Stone v. … FEC, 711 F.2d 279, 283 (D.C.Cir.1983); Kessenich v. CFTC, 684 F.2d 88, 91 (D.C.Cir.1982); Cities of Batavia, Naperville, et. al. v. FERC, 672 F.2d 64, 72-73 (D.C.Cir.1982); Microwave Communications, Inc. v.

General Teamsters and Allied Workers Local Union No. 992, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation, Teamsters Local Union No. 992, Intervenor

427 F.2d 582 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1970

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Stevens & Co., Inc. v.

Memorial Hospital/adair County Health Center, Inc. v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human Services

829 F.2d 111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 18, 1987

. § 1395x(v)(l)(A) (1982). … Orgs., Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 745 F.2d 677, 683-84 (D.C.Cir.1984).

Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

254 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1966

National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. … National Mediation Board, D.C., 223 F.Supp. 951 ; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v.