Case law

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, East Dayton Tool and Die Company, Intervenor. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, Westinghouse Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. The East Dayton Tool and Die Co., International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, and I.U.E. Local 668, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor

610 F.2d 956 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 1979

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO-CLC, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Westinghouse Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … It affords him a choice denied the Board when it proceeds under section 10(e)." Ball v. NLRB, supra note 48, 299 F.2d at 688 50 See text Supra at note 5 51 International Union, UAW v.

Newton v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

905 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2012

Second, the statute suggests judicial, not Board, primacy by providing that courts, rather than the Board, shall (if necessary) have the final word on all complaints. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 70 (2006); see also Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 902 (D.C.

Moore v. United States

359 A.2d 299 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1976

Brown, supra. … See United States v. Brown, supra. 8 . Appellant, of course consented to the first continuance.

Hartman v. Lubar

133 F.2d 44 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 31, 1942

Bluejacket, 259 U.S. 129, 138 , 42 S.Ct. 442 , 66 L.Ed. 858 ; Brown v. Gesellschaft, 70 App.D.C. 94 , 104 F.2d 227 ; Bank of United States v. Owens, 2 Pet. [U.S.] *527, 7 L.Ed. 508 ; E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. … . & Trust Co. v. Brown, 270 Pa. 264, 268 , 113 A. 443, 445 ; Johnson v. McMillion, 178 Ky. 707, 710 , 199 S.W. 1070, 1072 , L.R.A.1918C, 244. Cf. Warder v. Newburgh, 40 App.D.C. 385, 388 ; Embrey v.

Barton v. District of Columbia

131 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2001

Contract Appeals Board is distinguishable from the facts of this case. … See, e.g., Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973); Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

Munro v. United States Copyright Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2024

But contrary to Munro’s suggestion, the Board did consider—and then rejected—all these design features. As to the selection of the shapes and their attributes, the Review Board relied on Satava v. … Moreover, the Board could not even determine whether the curled fiber was fixed in its position, a requirement for copyright protection. See Kelley v.

First National Bank v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

225 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1955

Bank v. Kearny Fed. Sav. & L. Ass’n, 3 Cir., 1951, 187 F.2d 564 , certiorari denied, 1951, 342 U.S. 816 , 72 S.Ct. 30 , 96 L.Ed. 617 , and Springfield Institution for Savings v. Worcester Fed. Sav. & L. … McGrath, 339 U.S. 33 , 70 S.Ct. 445 , 94 L.Ed. 616 ; Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907 , 71 S.Ct. 620 , 95 L.Ed. 1345 ; Cates v. Haderlein, 342 U.S. 804 , 72 S.Ct. 47 , 96 L.Ed. 609 ; United States v. L. A.

Bagenstose v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

888 A.2d 1155 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2005

See Stevens v. Quick, 678 A.2d 28, 31 (D.C.1996). We conclude that the trial court did not err in affirming the Board’s decision that Ba-genstose’s retirement was voluntary. … Keyes v. District of Columbia, 362 U.S.App. D.C. 67, 72, 372 F.3d 434, 439 (2004); Covington v. Department of Health & Human Servs., 750 F.2d 937, 941 (Fed.Cir.1984); Christie v.

Stephen H. Payson v. William B. Franke, Secretary of the Navy

282 F.2d 851 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1960

The board found this appellant includable among the latter group. … Orloff v. Willoughby, 1953, 345 U.S. 83, 93 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 ; Creary v. Weeks, 259 U.S. 336, 343 , 42 S.Ct. 509 , 66 L.Ed. 973 , affirming Weeks v. United States, 1922, 51 App.D.C. 195 , 277 F. 594 .

Smith v. District of Columbia

336 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1975

In Fisher v. … See also Euge v. Trantina, 422 F.2d 1070, 1074 (8th Cir. 1970); Fox v. City of West Palm Beach, 383 F.2d 189, 195 (5th Cir. 1967); Brown v. Village of Deming, 56 N.M. 302 , 243 P.2d 609, 618 (1952); Chappell v.

National Association of Casualty and Surety Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Mnc Financial, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Professional Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Sovran Financial Corp., Intervenor

856 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1988

Agents v. Board of Governors, 835 F.2d 1452 (D.C.Cir.1987). … Co. v.

Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

132 F. Supp. 3d 98 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2015

See, e.g., Board of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys. v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 4 08 U.S. 564, 5 77 ( 197 2) .

Huff v. Secretary of Navy

413 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1976

Carlson v. … Brown, U. S. Marine Corps, filed as defendant’s Exhibit A.

Howard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

11 App. D.C. 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1897

Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, 450 ; P. R. Co. v. Jones, 155 U. S. 333, 350 . 2. … Co. v. Board, Coms. Coffee Co., 6 Kans. 245 ; see also 6 Thomp. Corp., Sec. 7896; 2 Morawetz Corp., Sec. 965a; Wharton, Confl."Laws, Sec. 3906.

Kinsey v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024).  Kinsey filed this suit against W. Hartley Powell, Director of the state’s tax department. … Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)).

Henry W. Jackson v. United States

336 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1964

Brown v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. -, 331 F.2d 822 (1964). In United States v. Prince, D.D.C. Crim. … As in Hawkins v.

Musengo, James v. Caldera, Louis

286 F.3d 535 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2002

Although this court has jurisdiction to review decisions of the Correction Board,5 we do so under an "unusually deferential application of the 'arbitrary or capricious' standard" of the APA. Kreis v. … Cir. 1995); Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1512 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (citing Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296 (1983)).

Dubose, DDS v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2023

See, e.g., Pollack v. U.S. … Featherson v. Educ.

Engel v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Additionally, “each allegation [in a pleading] must be simple, concise, and direct[,]” Fed. R. Civ. … See Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 (collecting cases) (citation omitted).

United States v. Shawn Hughes

813 F.3d 1007 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 2016

Before: BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. … See United States v.