Case law

Wibc, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Crosley Broadcasting Corporation, Intervenor. Wibc, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Crosley Broadcasting Corporation, an Ohio Corporation, Intervenor

259 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1958

Brown v. District of Columbia, 1888, 127 U.S. 579, 586 , 8 S.Ct. 1314 , 32 L.Ed. 262 ; United States v. Ballin, Joseph & Co., 1891, 144 U.S. 1 , 12 S.Ct. 507 , 36 L.Ed. 321 ; Frischer & Co. v. … State Tax Comm., 1946, 109 Utah 563 , 168 P.2d 324 ; Adkins v. Citizens Board, 1932, 112 W.Va. 171 , 163 S.E. 853, 854 .

In re Massey

725 A.2d 1014 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

Massey did not participate in the proceedings before the Board, and neither he nor Bar Counsel has filed in this court any exceptions to the Board’s report and recommendation. … North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). . The Board noted that resignation and disbarment are "functionally equivalent.” .

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, East Dayton Tool and Die Company, Intervenor. International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, Westinghouse Corporation, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. The East Dayton Tool and Die Co., International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, and I.U.E. Local 668, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor

610 F.2d 956 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 1979

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO-CLC, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Westinghouse Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … It affords him a choice denied the Board when it proceeds under section 10(e)." Ball v. NLRB, supra note 48, 299 F.2d at 688 50 See text Supra at note 5 51 International Union, UAW v.

National Association of Casualty and Surety Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Mnc Financial, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Professional Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Sovran Financial Corp., Intervenor

856 F.2d 282 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1988

Agents v. Board of Governors, 835 F.2d 1452 (D.C.Cir.1987). … Co. v.

Gilbert v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

182 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1950

White v. Coe, 68 App.D.C. 218 , 95 F.2d 347 ; Proctor & Gamble Co. v. … Coe v. United States, 65 App.D.C. 387 , 84 F.2d 240 ; Edgerton v. Kingsland, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 8 , 168 F.2d 128 ; Butterworth v. Hoe, 112 U.S. 50 , 5 S.Ct. 25 , 28 L.Ed. 656 ; Steinmetz v.

Huff v. Secretary of Navy

413 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1976

Carlson v. … Brown, U. S. Marine Corps, filed as defendant’s Exhibit A.

Calf Leather Tanners' Ass'n v. Morgenthau

80 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 11, 1935

Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Kadrie, 281 U.S. 206 , 50 S.Ct. 320 , 74 L.Ed. 809 ; Work v. United States ex rel. Rives, 267 U.S. 175 , 45 S.Ct. 252 , 69 L.Ed. 561 ; United States ex rel. Ness v. … Frey v. Robertson, 61 App.D.C. 394 , 63 F.(2d) 457 ; United States ex rel. Finley v. Hines, 58 App.D.C. 120 , 25 F.(2d) 544 ; United States ex rel. Carroll Electric Co. v. McCarl, 56 App.D.C. 49 , 8 F.(2d) 910 .

Howard v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

11 App. D.C. 300 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1897

Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445, 450 ; P. R. Co. v. Jones, 155 U. S. 333, 350 . 2. … Co. v. Board, Coms. Coffee Co., 6 Kans. 245 ; see also 6 Thomp. Corp., Sec. 7896; 2 Morawetz Corp., Sec. 965a; Wharton, Confl."Laws, Sec. 3906.

Kinsey v. Powell

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024).  Kinsey filed this suit against W. Hartley Powell, Director of the state’s tax department. … Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)).

Henry W. Jackson v. United States

336 F.2d 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 1964

Brown v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. -, 331 F.2d 822 (1964). In United States v. Prince, D.D.C. Crim. … As in Hawkins v.

Blakeney v. United States

653 A.2d 365 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1995

See, e.g., Gray v. … Thus, we have facts nowhere close to those that concerned the dissenter in Brown . 2 .

Rooney v. Secretary of the Army

293 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2003

.”); Brown v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v.

Cherry-Burrell Corporation v. Coe

143 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1944

Appellant is complaining, instead, of the Board’s refusal to consider new claims, upon an untimely petition for reconsideration of its decision concerning other claims. The law, as declared in Lucke v. … Potts v. Coe, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 300 , 140 F.2d 470, 473 ; Radtke Patents Corp. v. Coe, 74 App.D.C. 251 , 122 F.2d 937 ; Kirsch Mfg. Co. v.

Engel v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2025

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Additionally, “each allegation [in a pleading] must be simple, concise, and direct[,]” Fed. R. Civ. … See Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499 (collecting cases) (citation omitted).

Newton v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

905 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2012

Second, the statute suggests judicial, not Board, primacy by providing that courts, rather than the Board, shall (if necessary) have the final word on all complaints. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 70 (2006); see also Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 902 (D.C.

Alltel Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, National Exchange Carrier Association, Intervenor

838 F.2d 551 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1988

It is as if the FCC, asked to explain a rule that people with brown hair will be denied broadcast licenses, responded that it recognized that its rule imposed a burden on people with brown hair and in order to “soften” the … application of the rule it would deny licenses only to people with brown hair who were born in odd numbered years.

Christopher Code v. Ryan McCarthy

959 F.3d 406 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2020

Over Code’s objection, the district court granted the Secretary’s motion for voluntary remand to allow the Board to “address the inadequacies” raised by Code’s complaint. Code v. McHugh, 139 F. … J. at 13, Code v. Speer, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C. Jan. 16, 2018), ECF No. 20-1; Am. Compl. ¶ 113, Code v. Speer, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C. Apr. 13, 2017), ECF No. 17; Compl. ¶¶ 77-78, Code v. McHugh, No. 15-cv-31 (D.D.C.

Pippenger v. U.S. Doge Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2025

Institute of Peace v. … Ramirez v. Collier, 595 U.S. 411, 421 (2022) (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)).

Kim v. Brownlee

344 F. Supp. 2d 758 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2004

See Saunders v. White, 191 F.Supp.2d 95, 120 (D.D.C.2002). … V.

Thomas v. Baker

717 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1989

Shepherd v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 652 F.2d 1040, 1043 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See, e.g., Patkus v. Sangamon-Cass Consortium, 769 F.2d 1251, 1265-66 (7th Cir.1985); Hogue v. Clinton, 791 F.2d 1318, 1325 (8th Cir.1986); Okeson v.