Case law

Lovely v. Zoning Bd. of App. of City of Presque Isle

259 A.2d 666 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1969

Such was the holding of a single Justice in Broad-Miami Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (Ohio Com. Pl.1959) 185 N.E.2d 76 . But cf. Beerman v. … Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Plan. & Zon. Comm. (1962) 254 Iowa 380 , 118 N.W.2d 78, 81 ; Nelson v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Indianapolis (Ind.App.1959) 158 N.E.2d 167 , 174; see Moody v.

Mason v. City of Augusta

927 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 2007

See, e.g., Stenzel v. Dell, Inc., 2005 ME 37, ¶ 26 , 870 A.2d 133, 143 ; A.L. Brown Constr. Co. v. McGuire, 495 A.2d 794, 796-98 (Me.1985). Accordingly, the court erred in dismissing the complaint. … No. 3 v. Maine Sch. Dist.

Inhabitants of Yarmouth v. Inhabitants of North Yarmouth

34 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Corp. a. 2; Phillips v. Bury, 2 T. R. 346; Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 ; Allen v. McKeen, 1 Sumner, 276; The People v. Morris, 13 Wend. 325 ; Penobscot Boom Corp. v. … Trustees of the New Gloucester School Fund v. Bradbury, 11 Maine, 118, is a case similar to this at bar, and directly in point. Richardson v. Brown, 6 Maine, 355 ; Terrett v. Taylor, 9 Cranch, 43 ; Pawlet v.

The Tourist

265 F. 700 · District Court, D. Maine · May 3, 1920

Simmons v. New Bedford, 97 Mass. 367 , 393, 93 Am. Dec. 99 ; City of Panama, 101 U. S. 462 , 25 L. Ed. 1061 ; Elder Dempster Shipping Co. v. Pouppirt, 125 Fed. 732, 737 , 60 C. C. A. 500 . … The Supreme Court sustained Judge Brown’s action in The Max Morris, 137 U. S. 1 , 11 Sup. Ct. 29, 34 L.

Opinion of the Justices

161 Me. 182 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 1965

Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351, 360 , 61 A. 785 . Writing of the dual corporate and governmental capacity of a municipality, our Supreme Judicial Court said in Libby v. … Hooper v. Emery, 14 Me. 375 ; Concord v. Delaney, 58 Me. 309 .

Levesque v. Doocy

557 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 3, 2008

B to Decl. *161 of David Brown (“Brown Decl.”), Docket Item 43). 19 . Pl.'s Resp. SMF ¶ 72; DVD copy of defendants' on-air retraction (Ex. B to Brown Deck). 20 . … The statement "[T]he superintendent and the school board [are] looking into perhaps other charges against the kid because it's a hate crime.” is not actionable because it is substantially true. See Masson v.

State of Maine v. Michael T. Smith

2024 ME 56 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 1, 2024

State v. … See State v.

Green v. State

245 A.2d 147 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 1968

In Smith v. … See, State of Maine v. Couture, 1960, 156 Me. 231, 241 , 163 A.2d 646 . This humanitarian doctrine has gained recent converts. Brown v.

Ford v. Erskine

109 Me. 164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1912

Com. v. Cambridge, 7 Mass., 158, 165 ; Raymond v. Co. Commrs., 63 Maine, 112, 114. … See *168 Brown v. Co. Commrs., 12 Met., 208 , 209. See also Smith v. Boston, 194 Mass., 31, 34 . As to the liability of the defendants: One was a member of the board of county commissioners laying out the way.

State v. Levesque

146 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 1951

In State v. Brown, 103 S. C. 437, 88 S. E. 21 , L. R. … State v. Brown, supra; Bines v. The State, supra.

Cloutier v. Oakland Park Amusement Co.

129 Me. 454 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1930

Through boarded wall or wire screening there was no door or provision for exit. … Selinas v. Vermont Agri. Soc’y, 60 Vt., 249 , 15 Atl., 117 ; Dunn v. Brown Co. Agri. Soc’y, 46 Ohio St., 93 , 18 N. E., 96 .

Goodman v. President and Trustees of Bowdoin Coll.

135 F. Supp. 2d 40 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 16, 2001

Most explicit and comprehensive of these opinions is Mangla v. Brown University, in which the Court of Appeals explained: *55 The student-college relationship is essentially contractual in nature. … Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir.1998) (citing Russell v.

Clark v. Wardwell

55 Me. 61 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

Sanborn v. Machiasport, 53 Maine, 82. Section 7 of chapter 3, R. … State v. Williams, 31 Maine, 231; Beard v. Fossett, 34 Maine, 575; Brown v. Witham, 51 Maine, 21; Sanborn v. Machiasport, 53 Maine, 82.

Cushing v. Wyman

44 Me. 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

In Richardson v. … It was hold m Trescolt v.

Dotter v. Maine Employment Security Commission

435 A.2d 1368 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 1981

Thomas v. Review Board, 450 U.S. at 719 , 101 S.Ct. at 1432-1433 , 67 L.Ed.2d at 634-35 ; Sherbert v. … Thomas v. Review Board, supra. See also Sherwood v. Brown, 619 F.2d 47 (9th Cir. 1980); Robinson v. Price, 615 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir. 1980); Moody v. Cronin, 484 F.Supp. 270 (C.D.Ill.1979).

Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protection

823 A.2d 551 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 2003

of a permit or approval by the board, if the board determines that activities within the class will have no significant impact upon the environment. … See Food & Drug Admin, v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

Maples v. Contorakes

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 5, 2020

Brown briefly served as a Board member, Mr. and Ms. Contorakes have been the only members of the Board as well as the only officers the Association has ever had. … According to Article V, Section 3, the Board can revise assessments and make emergency assessments.

Garand v. Snowshoe Village Unit Owners Assoc.

Superior Court of Maine · May 18, 2005

The minutes of the board indicate that the accepted color was brown or a shade thereof. … The defendants' witnesses assertion that the board had accepted brown, but no lighter than the Moody's, is not documented.

State v. Hohler

543 A.2d 364 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1988

See e.g., Larouche v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 780 F.2d 1134 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir.1983); Tribune v. Huffstetler, 489 So.2d 722 (Fla.1986); Sinnott v. … Boston Retirement Board, 402 Mass. 581 , 524 N.E.2d 100 (1988); State v. Siel, 122 N.H. 254 , 444 A.2d 499 (1982); People v. Korkala, 99 A.D.2d 161 , 472 N.Y.S.2d 310 (1984); Brown v.

Hawkes v. Commercial Union Insurance

764 A.2d 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 2001

Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606 , 609 n. 2 (Me.1994). “Arising out of employment” means that the injury must have a causal connection to the employment. See Co-meau v. … Reports of such investigations go to the Board, and if the Board determines that fraud or other violations of the Act occurred, it shall report such to the Attorney General. Id. § 153(5)(D), (E).