Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.07s

  • Council of Prison Locals v. Roy Brewer

    735 F.2d 1497 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1984

    Physicians National House Staff Association v. … See Devine v. White, 697 F.2d 421, 435-36 (D.C.Cir.1983); Physicians National House Staff Association v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Taucher, Frank v. Brown-Hruska, Sharon

    396 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 2005

    See Kiareldeen v. … Compare, e.g., Glickman v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M STREET LLC

    257 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2003

    In August 1999, plaintiff Pauline Johnson-Brown contracted with the defendants to purchase a condominium in the Ritz-Carlton Residences, and plaintiff Lara Michelle Brown joined the contract by addendum. Id. at 5. … Carden v.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    108 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2000

    Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473 (D.D.C.1998). … See Brown-Jones v. The Am. Tobacco Co., No. CV198-36, slip op. at 9-12 (attached as Ex. C, Defs.’ Mot.); Wakeland v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 996 F.Supp. 1213, 1221-22 (S.D.Ala.1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Edward Brown

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 2010

    The district court denied Brown’s motion for a new trial. United States v. Brown, 535 F. Supp. 2d 80 (D.D.C. 2008). II. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Board

    744 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1990

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). … Id. at 233, 105 S.Ct. at 682 ; See also Whiteley v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Drug Enforcement Administration

    109 F. App'x 436 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Heckstall v. U.S. Government

    105 F. App'x 277 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ayub K. Ommaya v. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services

    726 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1984

    In Kottea-kos v. … It is clear that the Board may substitute its judgment for that of the presiding official. See Williams v. Veterans Admin., 701 F.2d 764, 765 (8th Cir.1983); McDonough v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Potomac Elec. Power Co.

    306 F. Supp. 3d 194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2018

    See Ulrich v. … Thus, Brown's claim is preempted. 2 See, e.g., *202 Washington v. AlliedBarton Sec.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Scahill v. District of Columbia

    271 F. Supp. 3d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2017

    See Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1286 (D.C. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (quoting Monell v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Soc.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Inova Health Care Services, for Inova Fairfax Hospital and Its Department, Life With Cancer v. Omni Shoreham Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2020

    Omni Shoreham relies primarily on Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C. … See 9 Mem., Browning v. Clinton, No. 98-cv-1991, at 2, 13–14, 24 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2001), ECF No. 109. 16 added); see also Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Brown

    619 A.2d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1993

    Hudson v. … Joseph v. Parekh, 351 A.2d 204, 205 (D.C.1976).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. I.T.T./Continental Baking Co.

    921 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1990

    to decide an issue not reached by the Board”); Todd Shipyards Corp. v. … v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    408 A.2d 79 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1979

    See Wallace v. Sullivan, Tenn., 561 S.W.2d 452, 454 (1978); Murphy v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 390 A.2d 973, 975 (1978) (quoting Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Elections

    319 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1970

    In Lyons v. … In Georgia Socialist Workers Party v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. Brown

    253 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 1958

    Searl v. Earll, supra; Earll v. Picken, 1940, 72 App.D.C. 91 , 113 F.2d 150 ; Ballard v. Spruill, 1934, 64 App.D.C. 60 , 74 F.2d 464 ; Wlodarek v. Thrift, 1940, 178 Md. 453 , 13 A.2d 774 ; Wright v. … Fordson Coal Co. v. Kentucky River Coal Corp., 6 Cir., 1934, 69 F.2d 131 ; Young v. Main, 8 Cir., 1934, 72 F.2d 640 ; Steiner v. Rowley, 1950, 35 Cal.2d 713 , 221 P.2d 9 ; Chelini v.

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Santora v. Copyright Claims Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2026

    See Bowman v. Iddon, 848 F.3d 1034, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2017). That means, among other things, considering factual allegations from all his filings, not just his complaint. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Comm’n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Bowser

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 2025

    Register makes this case quite unlike Lawrence v. D.C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 611 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1992), a case on which the Board relies. … The Board is “the gatekeeper for the initiative process.” Marijuana Pol’y Project v. United States, 304 F.3d 82, 84 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Wanda A. Brown

    671 F.2d 585 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1982

    See United States v. Russell, 670 F.2d 323 (D.C.Cir.1982). The police received a telephone tip from a reliable informant that led to the arrest of Wanda A. Brown on a street corner. … Brown presses the argument that the pouch was searched after the police seized it and that she could not have retrieved its possession when the search occurred. Thus, she maintains, Chimel v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.