Case law

Estate of Cornwell v. American Federation of Labor

197 F.R.D. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2000

See Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., 129 F.3d 143, 151 (D.C.Cir.1997); see also United States v. Amlani, 169 F.3d 1189, 1195 (9th Cir.1999); Garcia v. … Relatedly, plaintiff argues that any factual determinations underlying the Board’s denial of plaintiff’s benefit claim must be reviewed de novo, relying on Luby v.

Hale County v. United States

496 F. Supp. 1206 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 1980

City of Richmond v. … Plaintiffs cite Dallas County v. Reese, 421 U.S. 477 , 95 S.Ct. 1706 , 44 L.Ed.2d 312 (1975), Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.S. 112 , 87 S.Ct. 1554 , 18 L.Ed.2d 656 (1967), and Fortson v.

Brighthaupt v. District of Columbia

36 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2014

Monica Browne and M.Y. In accordance with the calculations in Court’s Exhibit 2, plaintiffs are due *6 $18,923.63 in attorney’s fees for work performed on Browne and J.B.’s case. 3. Ja’Quelle Yeager and J.Y. … See Gary G. v. El Paso Indep. Sch.

Aeschliman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

547 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1976

See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972). … EDF v.

United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

37 F. Supp. 398 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1941

products other than gypsum board (the indictment refers to such manufacturers as “distributors”) who purchased their gypsum board requirements from manufacturers of gypsum board (the indictment refers to the gypsum board … Justice Holmes in Swift & Company v. United States, 196 U.S. 375 , 25 S.Ct. 276, 279 , 49 L.Ed. 518 : “The general objection is urged that the bill does not set forth sufficient definite or specific facts.

Spriggs v. United States

52 A.3d 878 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2012

In Davis v. State, the defendant entered his home with Lawrence Brown, and together they raped the defendant’s wife. 611 So.2d 906, 908-09 (Miss.1992). … Brown’s entry, “and therefore Brown’s entry was not burglarious,” and he could not be found guilty as an accessory. Id. at 911 .

McKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

See EPA v. … In support of its argument, the Board cites two cases: Quarles v. Dep’t of the Navy, 893 F.2d 390 (D.C. Cir. 1990), and Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63 (D.C. Cir. 1974.)

Rossello v. Barnhart

473 F. Supp. 2d 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2007

Under SSA regulations, a claimant who has engaged in “substantial gainful activity” is not disabled, despite medical evidence to the contrary. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a), (b); Brown v. … Crosson v. Shalala, 907 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1995). Thus, the Council’s decision must be upheld, if “supported by substantial evidence.” 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Smith v. Bowen, 826 F.2d 1120, 1121 (D.C.Cir.1987); Brown v.

Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

808 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2015

See, e.g., Kavanaugh Dissent at 17-19; Brown Dissent at 9-10. … Priests for Life v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 772 F.3d 229, 250 (D.C.Cir.2014).

In Re Clarke

684 A.2d 1276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1996

R. 12(h)(1); Cusimano v. First Md. Sav. & Loan, 639 A.2d 553 , 557 n. 5 (D.C.1994) (defense of lack of personal jurisdiction is waived if neither asserted by motion nor included in a responsive pleading); Snyder v. … Respondent’s claim that he did not have a copy of Weinberg v. Clarke, CA 93-2522 (D.C.Super. Ct. April 5, 1994), the case in which Dr.

Barnabo v. Lewis

81 A.2d 659 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1951

In Hearn v. … In Hearn v.

Henderson v. United States

580 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1983

Reiner, supra; Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, 327 U.S. 251 , 66 S.Ct. 574 , 90 L.Ed. 652 (1946); Day v. Mathews, 530 F.2d 1083 (D.C.Cir.1976); Ehrman v. United States, C.A. No. 82-1984 (D.D.C.1983). … City of Cleveland, Ohio v. FPC, 525 F.2d 845 , 856 n. 89 (D.C.Cir.1976), quoting Williams v.

Fishermen's Dock Cooperative, Inc. v. Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce

52 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1995

FISHERMEN'S DOCK COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Ronald H. BROWN, Secretary of Commerce, Appellee. No. 94-5039. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 22, 1995. … Rule 36(b). 2 In Fishermen's Dock Cooperative, Inc. v. Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, Civ.

Ward v. Caldera

138 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2001

V. … .”); Georgia v.

Nimro v. Davis

204 F.2d 734 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1953

The Board relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of Cal. *736 v. … V, 1952).

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

117 F.4th 463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 24, 2024

United Paperworkers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v. Misco, Inc., 484 U.S. 29, 38 (1987). As this Court explained in American Postal Workers Union v. U.S. … In Union Pacific Railroad Co. v.

Davis v. University of the District of Columbia

603 A.2d 849 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1992

Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989) (citing cases); Grant v. District of Columbia, 545 A.2d 1262 (D.C.1988). … Id at 180 (quoting Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978)).

Independence Federal Savings Bank v. Bender

332 F. Supp. 2d 203 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2004

SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1165 (D.C.Cir.1978); see also Dan River, Inc. v. … See Todd Shipyards Corp. v.

United States v. Bernardo Bruce

939 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1991

Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 224 (6th Cir.1990) (“However broadly it may be construed, section 924(c)(1) will not support a conviction for mere possession of a firearm during the course of criminal conduct.”); United States v. … In United States v.

In Re DJ

532 A.2d 138 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1987

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). Citizens have no legal duty to talk to the police. See Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., 453 A.2d 110, 112 (D.C.1982). … Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497-98 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (plurality opinion) (citations omitted); Brown v. Texas, supra, 443 U.S. at 52 , 99 S.Ct. at 2641 ; United States v.